Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

When you're tuning you hold on every cell to see what's happening then make adjustments. Doesn't matter how long it takes the exhaust gas to travel as you adjust by cell on constant load. Unless you're a wizz and can make changes in less than 3 seconds. (some tuners would have you believe they can)By the way, 3 seconds ? Ahh, NO. Only if at boost you have a 25mm exhaust.

Learn to tune your own car so you tune for every day over a period of time rather than the hour your car is on the dyno. The weather changes, fuel, heat and engine condition. If your motor blows it may be that these conditions changed and the tuner actually got it right only at the time it was tuned. I think Nismoid is about to tell you how rediculous worrying about the time frame of the exhaust travel is. Shhhh, here he comes, let's see if I'm right. :yes:

This is why I run my wideband in my tail pipe. If the tuner likes, they can compare the ratio with what they are getting at the muffler but surely most would know there is some delay from what just came out of the manifold to what is being shown at the tail pipe...

Havent you seen the tailpipe squiggle lines on Initial D and Wangan? That means the gas is travelling very fast.

3 seconds would not translate to squiggle lines IMHO.

I think Nismoid is about to tell you how rediculous worrying about the time frame of the exhaust travel is. Shhhh, here he comes, let's see if I'm right. :yes:

Well if Motec and Ford seemed to think it was enough of an issue to measure it and adjust their tuning to suit, then I'm going to guess it isn't ridiculous.

Well if Motec and Ford seemed to think it was enough of an issue to measure it and adjust their tuning to suit, then I'm going to guess it isn't ridiculous.

There goes all credibility right there.

It wouldn't be the hardest thing to calculate a rough figure of the time if some one knew how to do it for a turbocharged engine.

Going off of very rough calculations I did with simple figures for a NA engine (2.5L engine at 1000RPM) I get around 4m/s out of a 3" exhaust - so around 1 second of travel.

That's just using some basic engineering formulas I can remember.

Would love to see some one elses complete working equations on it though, would be quite interesting.

I'm just not 100% sure on how above atmospheric pressure (boost) effects the formulas with an exhaust housing slowing down the airflow?

Just because one person at a company says something that doesnt make it the official company policy/opinion.

But it gives some credibility to asking the question and doing testing to see what the result is, it also doesn't give you guys a reason to be cocks about it.

Furthermore, does this mean most of us now need to go and retune our cars as were probably tuned 3 seconds out?

Does this also mean I will shave 3 seconds from my 0-100?

That would mean some of us will be defying physics.

You should start a thread about defying physics.

Would be curious to hear STATUS' opinion on this.

trent tunes cars with both methods. depends on the application... he said it makes fuckall difference :)

No but I would suggest you get a class in english comprehension : p

So I can impress people on forums. I'll get right on that.

Then I'll use my 'new found' literary skills and talk about reinventing the wheel on SAU. :wave:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...