Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

5 hours ago, iruvyouskyrine said:

Why?

Well when I had it done it was laggy, maybe too far along the scroll created too much turbulence I'm not sure. But its certainly possible as the actual fabrication of the gate pipe with split right up to the gate was great work from my fabricator. Pics in my old build thread.

Yes and no.  It is possible to do two pipes to a single wastegate properly.  There was a thread showing that on here recently.  I would also be possible to do it wrongly.  You need to keep both halves of the system isolated from each other when the gate is closed.  If the two pipes from the two halves are open to each other before the gate, then the pressure pulses will leak and ruin the effect, thus making it pointless.  That particular example off a twin scroll housing (above) doesn't look like it would be internally divided in the pipe running to the wastegate.  I therefore suspect that it is not a good implementation.  Obviously it will still work and make lots of power.....but what about the spool behaviour, etc etc?

That video seems like a very weird way to do it. It sort of rolls over both sides of the housing and has a very large diameter gate pipe.

I would look at doing it directly off the housing like a conventional single scroll system. Turbo will be GTX3067 with a tiny (physicslly) rear housing.

That's the problem with trying to do it on twin scroll housings.  On a single scroll housing, you have a spot just downstream of the housing's inlet flange where the scroll is nice and big - nearly the same size as the manifold connection itself.  So you can put a single pipe off of that (or the gate direct onto it) and get the gas to flow properly.  But a twin scroll is already compromised by having the gas paths in that same location squeezed into a tall-narrow shape.  You can only access the short sides of these paths, so can't weld on a round/squarish port for the offtakes.  And they're right next to each other and the offtakes need to be right there in the same spot next to each other.  It's just all so compromised that you'd be better off with gate(s) off the manifold.

  • 3 weeks later...

I wonder how much of a difference it makes having the pressure communication inside the wastegate, someone go make a simulation pls.

Because I'm wanting to go a similar style manifold, saves a massive headache with piping. 

Edited by owen1r

That's not what he's asking.  The wastegate is a valve.  When it is closed it SHOULD block off the communication between the two halves of the manifold, and if it doesn't, that's bad.  When it is open, it will impose a pressure drop on the flow passing through it.  It will be like the end of any pipe, any orifice, etc etc.  The pressure pulses that come down the pipe from one half of the manifold will leak into the other half of the manifold because of that.  The question is.....how much does it negatively effect it?

I think it somewhat defeats the purpose of the whole split pulse idea.  But I am willing ti accept that split pulse with turbos is more about getting the thing to spool better.  Once the gate is open, the pulses can probably leak between halves of the system without too much negative effect.  But that's just a gut feeling.

  • Like 2

I would of also thought that you'd struggle to get a good seal between the divider and the wastegate piston with varying brands of wastegates etc. I'd expect there to be a gap of a mm or two.

I'm hoping someone like fullrace will chime in with some data, as I believe they've done plenty of simulations.

I was thinking that it would leak right where the gate valve meets the divided part in the pipe. I assembled the gate and send a camera inside to check if it leaks, by seeing light. It's not perfect but very very close. Make me think what would happen when it heats up on expansion if it would leak even more. Or seal better. I guess in drag racing all that's not to important, but I wanted this style in the event I wanted to use it on another setup. I do agree that my reasoning for this was all the piping/plumbing.
I always get my manifold from Kyle at 6 boost. Hands down the best for the cash.

I had an etm twin scroll single gate manifold and it worked fine with a Garrett t04z but when I changed to a precision it wouldn't control boost.
I welded it up and went with welding the gate off the turbine housing. Problem solved and 500rpm less lag.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • My thinking is that if the O2 sensor is shot then your entire above described experience is pure placebo.
    • Here is the mess that I made. That filler there was successful in filling dents in that area. But in the middle area. I can feel dents. And I've gone ocer it multiple times with filler. And the filler is no longer there because i accidently sanded it away. I've chased my tail on this job but this is something else lol. So I'm gonna attempt filler one more time and if it doesn't work I'll just high fill primer the door and see where the issues are because guidecoat is of no use atm.
    • Ok, so I think I sort of figured out where I went wrong. So I definitely overthinked it, and I over sanded, which is probably a large part of the problem. to fix it, I ended up tapping some spots that were likely to be high, made them low, filled them in, and I tackled small sections at a time, and it feels a lot better.    I think what confused me as well is you have the bare metal, and some spots darker and some are lighter, and when I run my finger across it, it' would feel like it's a low spot, but I think it's just a transition in different texture from metal to body filler.    When your finger's sliding on the body filler, and crosses over to the bare metal, going back and forth, it feels like it's a low spot. So I kept putting filler there and sanding, but I think it was just a transition in texture, nothing to do with the low or high spot. But the panel's feels a lot better, and I'm just going to end up priming it, and then I'll block it after with guide coat.   Ended up wasting just about all of my filler on this damn door lol  
    • -10 is plenty for running to an oil cooler. When you look at oil feeds, like power steering feeds, they're much smaller, and then just a larger hose size to move volume in less pressure. No need for -12. Even on the race cars, like Duncans, and endurance cars, most of them are all running -10 and everything works perfectly fine, temps are under control, and there's no restrictions.
    • Update: O2 sensor in my downpipe turned out to be faulty when I plugged in to the Haltech software. Was getting a "open circuit" warning. Tons of carbon buildup on it, probably from when I was running rich for a while before getting it corrected. Replaced with new unit and test drove again. The shuffle still happens, albeit far less now. I am not able to replicate it as reliably and it no longer happens at the same RPM levels as before. The only time I was able to hear it was in 5th going uphill and another time in 5th where there was no noticeable incline but applying more throttle first sped it up and then cleared it. Then once in 4th when I slightly lifted the throttle going over a bump but cleared right after. My understanding is that with the O2 sensor out, the ECU relies entirely on the MAP tune and isn't able to make its small adjustments based on the sensors reading. All in all, a big improvement, though not the silver bullet. Will try validating the actuators are set up correctly, and potentially setting up shop time to tune the boost controller on closed loop rather than the open loop it is set to now. Think if it's set up on closed loop to take the O2 reading, that should deal with these last bits. Will try to update again as I go. 
×
×
  • Create New...