Jump to content
SAU Community

True Twin Scroll Turbo & Manifold Design Discussion


Recommended Posts

Not a bad job, at least the angle promotes good flow, but damn its tiny. I would have gone for a much larger gate.

What is it with everyone running 38mm/40mm gates, no love for the 50's and 60's? There is power to be made there...

Here is an exhaust I worked on recently, Not an easy job but it got the results. 0.82 split GT3076. Aircon lines remain intact.

post-63525-0-59200500-1343268317_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That looks so nice Scotty. Was it expensive? Looks like there would be a fair bit of work in it.

Is there much performance loss with running a single gate off a split pulse manifold with a twin scroll turbo?

Obviously it won't be as good as a twin gate setup, but do you loose much response, power or torque anywhere?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not really, it cost him around 2 grand for the full system, plus he had intake and cooler piping made.

I would think if you can get the gate to seal the two halves a single wastegate would work just as well, as long as it was big enough and had good flow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is funny how people scoff as using a single wastegate on a twin scroll manifold and turbine housing without fully understanding what difference it would make. Who ever started the rumours that you needed two "or else" must be laughing and selling a lot of wastegates!

Anyway, dividing the wastegate flows right up until the wastegate (such as the photo in the link) would be much better than just merging the two flows before the gate (like on a Greddy or HKS manifold).

Yes it is in a great spot before the turn on the turbine housing to control boost very well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6boost do a split pulse single gate manifold don't they? Has anyone tried one out?

If you are going to the trouble of buying a twin scroll turbo, I would have thought you would get a decent manifold to get the most from it rather than putting the gate off the turbine housing? I was always under the impression people only did the gate off the turbine when wanting to run external gate on the stock manifold

Edited by Mitcho_7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As the highest pressure point it makes sense to me to run the gate off the housing which is why I talked Artz into it. The idea for my setup, (if I ever get around to making it) is to get the flow straight through the turbo, cutting out the back of the scroll and making the wastegate the priority when it is open. With twin scroll just run the splitter up to the gate and the same will apply.

Too many setups I see favour the turbo at the expense of the wastegate flow which would mean too much power is lost up top imo.

post-63525-0-86152700-1343276303_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is funny how people scoff as using a single wastegate on a twin scroll manifold and turbine housing without fully understanding what difference it would make. Who ever started the rumours that you needed two "or else" must be laughing and selling a lot of wastegates!

Anyway, dividing the wastegate flows right up until the wastegate (such as the photo in the link) would be much better than just merging the two flows before the gate (like on a Greddy or HKS manifold).

Yes it is in a great spot before the turn on the turbine housing to control boost very well.

The whole point of twin scroll is to work in the firing order 'pulse'.

Would make sense...

Manifold is divided

Turbine housing is divided

... that the wastegate would follow a similar premise.

Be good to see some actual information/testing/data with single vs dual with a true T/S setup to dispel - I'm assuming you have some?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am assuming you do thinking it is undoubtably better.

You can't have evidence for everything (I see you honking that horn a lot be-littling people) sometimes it is just not feasible. You should understand that there is more "best practice" using engineering principles in industry that have been established over a long time by some very smart people.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The whole point of twin scroll is to work in the firing order 'pulse'.

Would make sense...

Manifold is divided

Turbine housing is divided

... that the wastegate would follow a similar premise.

Be good to see some actual information/testing/data with single vs dual with a true T/S setup to dispel - I'm assuming you have some?

This was my understanding

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6boost do a split pulse single gate manifold don't they? Has anyone tried one out?

If you are going to the trouble of buying a twin scroll turbo, I would have thought you would get a decent manifold to get the most from it rather than putting the gate off the turbine housing? I was always under the impression people only did the gate off the turbine when wanting to run external gate on the stock manifold

I had a twin scroll 6boost with single Tial 44mm and twin scroll T04z.

Worked mint... I also don't see the huge need for twin gates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

well i have a "true" twin scroll setup on a RB2530 with twin gates, GTX35 with 6boost

I also have a Twin scoll setup for a RB2630 with single HKS 60mm on a 6boost - i havnt picked a turbo yet for this motor.

the RB2530 i should have some results within a month or so.

the RB2630 i wont have any results for at least 9months

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mico - Whoever said that? If they have, they're being pretty bold about pulling the wool over your eyes - the whole point to split pulse is you are splitting the pulses and reducing exhaust collisions etc. If you have 6 pulses feeding into one collector, no amount of design is going to change the fact that you'll have twice as many high pressure pulses pushing for the same space in the same time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hmm. Was quite a few years ago now. I think I bought from a crowd in the US called CDT Audio. The speaker is the HD-6. The HD-6CF would have been the better option (based on T-S parameters), but they were discontinued in 4 ohm at that point in time. The HD-6 is a better driver in almost every other way (than the CF) - just not as good in IB. They still do the HD-6. They might even have a more suitable (for IB) option here.https://www.cdtaudio.com/cdtnew22/products/components/woofers/midwoofers/midwoofers.htm But, here's the rub. I was working in the US a lot back then, so I got them delivered to my US office and then just brought them back to OZ myself. I don't know if they will ship to OZ, and it probably wouldn't be great cost-wise anyway. As to results. They're driven direct off the rear channels of my headunit, because the headunit can be setup to run the rears as subs. So, not a lot of power being fed there. Nevertheless, there's no shortage of volume - the sub levels don't need or want to be boosted at all. The bass is definitely not what you would call "tight". It is definitely a bit delayed compared to a proper sub. But, with the great front soundstage and really good 6.5" woofers in the front doors, I'm getting most of the bass detail from the front and the rear is really only to extend the bottom end a bit. Works for what I'm doing. I mean - until recently you couldn't really hold a conversation in my car due to the fuel pump, and for many years I had tyres so noisy (Kumho KU36 at <50 tread depth) that I had to drive with earplugs anyway!
    • curious to know what drivers you chose and the results? quik mafs, says two 6.5s should roughly equate somewhere between a single 8" or 10" driver. i agree that IB is definitely the way to go in most cars imo.
    • S13 and R32 rear suspension geometry is horrible once you lower it (which everyone does). The camber & toe out ramp is very aggressive, hence it's common for the S13 boys/girls to use a S14 or S15 subframe as the geometry is light years ahead. I'm sure the same can be done on R32s, but I don't know anyone that has done that.
    • Well, of course there's something wrong with the suspension. It was like that when it came out of the factory. Nissan wanted it to ride at least 50mm higher than most of us. They wanted it to be comfortable enough that the press and user reviews didn't complain about fillings being knocked out of teeth. The marketing people wanted to be able to talk about their fantastic new 4WS system (even if it was a pointless exercise, ha! pointless! Do you see what I did there? no? oh well. too bad). There weren't any semi-slicks or semi-semi-slicks or 18" wheels. Laser pointers didn't exist, so you couldn't easily build a bump steer gauge. There wasn't any better technology for suspension bushes than squishy shit in a condom. The list goes on.
    • I personally recommend not messing with factory suspension until you can clearly identify something wrong. For example I think the R33 might need some way to adjust front camber because I feathered the edges of the tires much more than the center of the tread doing some figure 8s and slalom.
×
×
  • Create New...