Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok just a quickie..ECU has built in MAP so all i have to do is run a hose to the manifold..

Now instructions told me to put a T-piece to the boost reference port on the reg which is what I have done...and it works..

But I am a bit worried about the hose running along the fuel rail as I have noticed it gets quite hot..i have put it inside some of that plastic conduit with the injector loom but not sure if this is a great idea either..

Im wondering if it is better to just plug it in at the back of the manifold, maybe where the boost gauge is or something...

Or is there any reason it SHOULD stay connected to the fuel reg reference pipe ??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/392904-where-to-plug-map-hose/
Share on other sites

is there any reason it SHOULD stay connected to the fuel reg reference pipe ??

No.

Your instructions are written as a guide. FPR takeoff is from a convenient point in the plenum, and the guide just helps pick up a convenient point.

Use a decent quality type hose and you can sheath it and/or cable tie it to stop it chafing or subject it to heat etc if you want. Bottom line is to use a hose-spec that's not going to be affected by heat, and protect it/route it away from exhaust pipes/manifolds.

The suggested pickup is only for somewhere to get a reliable MAP signal.

Between your manifold and BOV is good. Between your FPR and manifold is good but not suggested, if somehow that line in any way gets damaged you will lose pressure which is applied to your FPR to help raise fuel pressure. ie you will run lean if you somehow split the line going to your ECU. I think the best place to get the boost reading from is right infront of your turbo. You have the boost reading as is, straight out of the turbo. Route it through the driver side rather than passenger side, there are cleaner ways to get in on the driver side in an R33.

I think the best place to get the boost reading from is right infront of your turbo.
That doesn't give "manifold" pressure (MAP = Manifold Absolute Pressure). It certainly doesn't give manifold vacuum. On boost, it will tend to spike and drop back.

The best place is off the manifold.

That doesn't give "manifold" pressure (MAP = Manifold Absolute Pressure). It certainly doesn't give manifold vacuum. On boost, it will tend to spike and drop back.

The best place is off the manifold.

Yeah after reading it, you are right. I would hook my boost controller where I said initially and hook the MAP sensor to any line running directly off it(to the BOV, FPR) or you can always tap one into it.

so the boost gauge port on the back of the manifold is no good??

hose is tucked neatly with the wiring loom that runs along the firewall to the ECU so it will be fine there..its just running it under the intake plenum I dont like...

so the boost gauge port on the back of the manifold is no good??

hose is tucked neatly with the wiring loom that runs along the firewall to the ECU so it will be fine there..its just running it under the intake plenum I dont like...

Absolutely. Afterall, the sensor that is already connected to the back of the plenum is a MAP sensor......

OK...... Um...... I'm no expert but.........

The Map sensor line for your ECU should be installed on the most reliable map source on your engine so it does not receive pulsing from the inlet manifold.

Any where in the center of the plenum away from the runners if possible. Some ECU's with very fast map sensors and very poor filtering will see every pulse and make it hard to tune.

I have seen as much as 4-7 psi variation from poorly installed map lines.

DO NOT put it with anything that bleeds air. EG, boost controller. As this will drop your reference psi.

I recommend putting it with your fuel pressure reg. This makes sure that if it does come of, your engine is guaranteed to run like a bucket.

This will make you look further.

If you have a boost gauge then this can work well too. It gives you a visual if the sensor line has some off. (less vacuum/less boost)

I used the small VAC port on the back of the plenum on my RB25 with Link G4. Its the same size as the MAP sensor on the board so does make sence.

Doesnt cause me any dramas.

And im pretty sure link suggest to stay away from FPR and BOV lines. Just being cautious i suppose. Id rather it have its own vac supply personally.

This way you just run it along the brake lines on the firewall and through the grommet under the ABS :) Easy done.

Edited by gotRICE?

^^^yeah thats what i thought too..i already have a t-piece in my boost gauge and the stock gauge is still running, I figure i just use this line that is going to the stock gauge cause I dont really need it..as hyped said that way I have a visual as well...

^^^yeah thats what i thought too..i already have a t-piece in my boost gauge and the stock gauge is still running, I figure i just use this line that is going to the stock gauge cause I dont really need it..as hyped said that way I have a visual as well...

Yeah id do this. That way your boost gauge and ecu should always see the same boost. I have my boost gauge and controller reading from the one port (both using map sensors) and they work fine

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The ATTESSA is functionally identical to R34; there were a bunch of JDM models that continued ATTESSA including Fuga/Q70, Skyline/Q50, Cima etc as an option. All with Auto only and I think mostly for snow regions. AFAIK there were no AWD VR30DDTT sold in Australia - it is on my to do list to check regs for racing a LHD car in Targa/ATR/AASA/CAMS events because if I can get the auto to work it would be interesting to run a 4wd car The Ecuteck TCM tuning is the same model as their ECU tuning, they already have it for R35 and Dose's favourite, BMW. You buy "points" to allow your computer to be tuned, buy either a bluetooth (phone app) or bluetooth+USB+Key (phone and PC) dongle, and pay for a tune that will be locked to your tuner ( ). You can also access the tuning software yourself but 1. it is mega expensive and 2. these computers have a billion parameters that intersect, so how could you ever spend enough time on it to get a decent result.
    • Or, is it a case of what it is like owning an R series Skyline? NFI what the previous owner has done or fiddled with... Ha ha ha After reading through this thread, I went on a bit of a research about the Q50/Q60. Now I'm quite intrigued by them! Is the AWD in them more like a WRX where it's always AWD, or is it more like the ATTESSA in the GTRs? By the sound of this TCU tuning, this sounds like a case of someone has made some real software for it, and you just need the right piece of hardware, and then you license that specific vehicle/TCU. Or is this a case of the software will be really expensive so only a few tuners have it, and you still have to pay a license per vehicle?
    • By popular demand.. it was a coil. Got my hands on 1 new OEM coil, replaced with the one that made the less noise difference when I unplugged it while the car was running and started the car up. No stutter and the engine light was gone. I guess I’ll buy the other 5 they have lol
    • No, code 21 is very straightforward. It can only be the things described in that diagnostic flow. In fact it has no way of knowing that the spark plug resistance is out of spec.
    • Hi, SteveL Thank you very much for your reply, you seem to be the only person on the net who has come up with a definitive answer for which I am grateful. The "Leak" was more by way of wet bubbles when the pedal was depressed hard by a buddy while trying to gey a decent pedal when bleeding the system having fitted the rebuilt BM50 back in the car, which now makes perfect sense. A bit of a shame having just rebuilt my BM50, I did not touch the proportioning valve side of things, the BM50 was leaking from the primary piston seal and fluid was running down the the Brake booster hence the need to rebuild, I had never noticed any fluid leaking from that hole previously it only started when I refitted it to the car. The brake lines in the photo are "Kunifer" which is a Copper/Nickel alloy brake pipe, but are only the ones I use to bench bleed Master cylinders, they are perfectly legal to use on vehicles here in the UK, however the lines on the car are PVF coated steel. Thanks again for clearing this up for me, a purchase of a new BMC appears to be on the cards, I have been looking at various options in case my BM50 was not repairable and have looked at the HFM BM57 which I understand is manufactured in Australia.  
×
×
  • Create New...