Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

ok just a quickie..ECU has built in MAP so all i have to do is run a hose to the manifold..

Now instructions told me to put a T-piece to the boost reference port on the reg which is what I have done...and it works..

But I am a bit worried about the hose running along the fuel rail as I have noticed it gets quite hot..i have put it inside some of that plastic conduit with the injector loom but not sure if this is a great idea either..

Im wondering if it is better to just plug it in at the back of the manifold, maybe where the boost gauge is or something...

Or is there any reason it SHOULD stay connected to the fuel reg reference pipe ??

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/392904-where-to-plug-map-hose/
Share on other sites

is there any reason it SHOULD stay connected to the fuel reg reference pipe ??

No.

Your instructions are written as a guide. FPR takeoff is from a convenient point in the plenum, and the guide just helps pick up a convenient point.

Use a decent quality type hose and you can sheath it and/or cable tie it to stop it chafing or subject it to heat etc if you want. Bottom line is to use a hose-spec that's not going to be affected by heat, and protect it/route it away from exhaust pipes/manifolds.

The suggested pickup is only for somewhere to get a reliable MAP signal.

Between your manifold and BOV is good. Between your FPR and manifold is good but not suggested, if somehow that line in any way gets damaged you will lose pressure which is applied to your FPR to help raise fuel pressure. ie you will run lean if you somehow split the line going to your ECU. I think the best place to get the boost reading from is right infront of your turbo. You have the boost reading as is, straight out of the turbo. Route it through the driver side rather than passenger side, there are cleaner ways to get in on the driver side in an R33.

I think the best place to get the boost reading from is right infront of your turbo.
That doesn't give "manifold" pressure (MAP = Manifold Absolute Pressure). It certainly doesn't give manifold vacuum. On boost, it will tend to spike and drop back.

The best place is off the manifold.

That doesn't give "manifold" pressure (MAP = Manifold Absolute Pressure). It certainly doesn't give manifold vacuum. On boost, it will tend to spike and drop back.

The best place is off the manifold.

Yeah after reading it, you are right. I would hook my boost controller where I said initially and hook the MAP sensor to any line running directly off it(to the BOV, FPR) or you can always tap one into it.

so the boost gauge port on the back of the manifold is no good??

hose is tucked neatly with the wiring loom that runs along the firewall to the ECU so it will be fine there..its just running it under the intake plenum I dont like...

so the boost gauge port on the back of the manifold is no good??

hose is tucked neatly with the wiring loom that runs along the firewall to the ECU so it will be fine there..its just running it under the intake plenum I dont like...

Absolutely. Afterall, the sensor that is already connected to the back of the plenum is a MAP sensor......

OK...... Um...... I'm no expert but.........

The Map sensor line for your ECU should be installed on the most reliable map source on your engine so it does not receive pulsing from the inlet manifold.

Any where in the center of the plenum away from the runners if possible. Some ECU's with very fast map sensors and very poor filtering will see every pulse and make it hard to tune.

I have seen as much as 4-7 psi variation from poorly installed map lines.

DO NOT put it with anything that bleeds air. EG, boost controller. As this will drop your reference psi.

I recommend putting it with your fuel pressure reg. This makes sure that if it does come of, your engine is guaranteed to run like a bucket.

This will make you look further.

If you have a boost gauge then this can work well too. It gives you a visual if the sensor line has some off. (less vacuum/less boost)

I used the small VAC port on the back of the plenum on my RB25 with Link G4. Its the same size as the MAP sensor on the board so does make sence.

Doesnt cause me any dramas.

And im pretty sure link suggest to stay away from FPR and BOV lines. Just being cautious i suppose. Id rather it have its own vac supply personally.

This way you just run it along the brake lines on the firewall and through the grommet under the ABS :) Easy done.

Edited by gotRICE?

^^^yeah thats what i thought too..i already have a t-piece in my boost gauge and the stock gauge is still running, I figure i just use this line that is going to the stock gauge cause I dont really need it..as hyped said that way I have a visual as well...

^^^yeah thats what i thought too..i already have a t-piece in my boost gauge and the stock gauge is still running, I figure i just use this line that is going to the stock gauge cause I dont really need it..as hyped said that way I have a visual as well...

Yeah id do this. That way your boost gauge and ecu should always see the same boost. I have my boost gauge and controller reading from the one port (both using map sensors) and they work fine

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Some of the filler.   Also if I look under the top flap of metal it starts looking good quite close to the edge. I get the feeling it doesn't go much further.
    • So, I finally started digging at the bit of my roof that was cracking and bulging a bit. Well, it was just thick filler that was covering some pretty bad rust. I didn't find the edges, I was too bummed to keep going.  There are a few holes as you can see. There was just so much filler but looks like no attempt under the filler to prime or use rust converter, just slapped filler on exposed rust.  Anyway, I'm going to take the windshield out and find the edges. I'd love to fix this myself as I'm pretty sure it'll be expensive to get done properly. I was thinking I could just get a cut piece from another E39 and just weld it in place as it would be the right size and shape.  Thoughts?
    • This is the territory of the "Stage 1/2/3 Golf GTI/R" or otherwise off the shelf tune with (relative to before) minor mods. It's easier now. Downpipe and Tune and boom, big increases. Stage 1 OEM+ is where it's at. This is where the niche evolved into and it's really easy to see why. It's rare to even NEED to consider changing turbos or going to aftermarket ECU's or building bottom ends for more power. Stage 1-2-3 will get you a LONG WAY. Civic Type R turbo GR Yaris/Corolla Anything with B58 (MKV Supra/x40i) Anything BMW in General Anything Audi in General Any turbo AMG RenaultSport Turbo offerings Korean Elantra N/I30N Ecoboost Mustangs Focus RS? List goes on. I would argue in the future it won't even need to go on... M3P is pretty rapid out of the box...
    • There is a way, but it's not with the same cars. You need to find the same vintage of car, that we had. Realistically, that was an affordable car with aftermarket parts around. So what people need to find is a car that had a decent base in its day, and can be modified. They're looking for a car year make of 2010 to 2015 really... Aus could have done it if Holden didn't fold as V8 commodores were cheap, and if Ford didn't get expensive thanks to COVID, then you could cheaply play with FG Barras. Realistically, those are just a bit heavier, four door skylines. I'm sure the US and UK have similar cars they could find.
    • Haha I do that.. thats when it chirps..The bit point for me is almost non-existent. Otherwise I stall it. But yes, in terms of performance, the clutch is solid af.
×
×
  • Create New...