Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

make sure you keep the restrictor in the breather hoses, it is there for a reason

Do all RB engines have that or just 26's? When I setup my breather system I looked for a restrictor in the stock breather hoses and there was nothing...

  • Replies 43
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Do all RB engines have that or just 26's? When I setup my breather system I looked for a restrictor in the stock breather hoses and there was nothing...

As far as i know its only the 26 that has that on there, i know my 20 doesn't and i'm fairly confident the 25 doesn't either.

I highly suggest you read this, as it has pretty much all the answers to your questions thumbsup.gif

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/314402-project-rb31dett-the-development-of-my-open-deck-rb-engine-and-the-quest-for-more-torque/page__view__findpost__p__6039475

Will this be efficient?

*excluding the breather though.

IMG_0196.jpg

No!. All this is doing is blowing the exh side gasses straight back to the turbo intake, totally defeating the purpose of installing the catch can - more correctly "oil-air-separator".

Leave the "U" hose connecting the 2 rocker covers. Disconnect the hose going from the exh cover down to the intake side of the turbo, and re-direct that to the catch can. Run the other fitting on the catch can back to the inlet side of the turbo. Simple.

Edited by blind_elk

Do all RB engines have that or just 26's? When I setup my breather system I looked for a restrictor in the stock breather hoses and there was nothing...

My 20 had a brass restrictor in the return pipe to the intake for the factory breather setup

No!. All this is doing is blowing the exh side gasses straight back to the turbo intake, totally defeating the purpose of installing the catch can - more correctly "oil-air-separator".

Leave the "U" hose connecting the 2 rocker covers. Disconnect the hose going from the exh cover down to the intake side of the turbo, and re-direct that to the catch can. Run the other fitting on the catch can back to the inlet side of the turbo. Simple.

Thanks alot man. That's all I wanted to know haha.

On my old gtr I had the autech style oil/air separator that sits ontop of the cam covers,

My new gtr has the pcv blocked, oil return to turbo inlet blocked and just running 2 hoses from cam covers to an atmo catch can, anything wrong with this besides been illegal?

Not a huge fan of this setup but that catch can/washer bottle fills the spot where the battery was (battery is relocated to boot)

The advantage of having the catch can breather connected to an intake is that it creates suction and helps clear the vapours better. This requires a proper catch can which functions as an oil/air seperator or a seperate oil /air seperator (you don't have to buy the Nismo ones - Moroso do them cheaper or you could have one fabricated) in the line. If you are having a catch can made you can specify proper baffling. Some catch cans have removable tops and bottoms and you can check and modify them yourself if necessary. Some ebay catch cans are so small and useless as to be for show only.

If you have heaps of blow by for what ever reason and the catch can set up you have is not coping then you will not want to feed this into your intake. Preferably you will fix the problem or modify your system to deal with it but (in NZ anyway) you can vent to atmosphere for track cars.

I have seen the engine bays of a number of Japanese race cars that have air oil seperators and one or two catch cans and run the breathers into the intake.

Indeed the good old steel wool in a stocking will be going inside the can.

This does f**k all, trust me. It's more likely to leave you with bits of disintegrated stocking and metal fibers in your intake then separate any oil from the air.

You have a GTR, give it the parts it deserves and get a properly baffled catch can. I got my custom combined 2L catch can/radiator overflow bottle from Pro Fabrications for $390 delivered, Brad is a good bloke and knows exactly what he is doing. Spend a bit more cash and do it right.

426487_10150508799027541_519882540_9106071_909800602_n.jpg

Edited by Hanaldo

i have a catch tank just like the one above n seems to work well.

i have a drain hole at the bottom of the can and i also have a spare fitting on the bottom of my extended sump.

if i was to run a braided line from the can directly to the sump would this be effective? or will oil from my sump just run up that line back towards the can?

When we do a sump & catch can for the same vehicle I always suggest a breather hose from a high point of the sump above oil level to the base of the catch can.

It just provides a better vent for the crankcase not a drain for the catch can.

This does f**k all, trust me. It's more likely to leave you with bits of disintegrated stocking and metal fibers in your intake then separate any oil from the air.

You have a GTR, give it the parts it deserves and get a properly baffled catch can. I got my custom combined 2L catch can/radiator overflow bottle from Pro Fabrications for $390 delivered, Brad is a good bloke and knows exactly what he is doing. Spend a bit more cash and do it right.

I was waiting for this quote. Obviously Im looking for my best option. Not OH MY GOD NIIIIISSSSSMMMMOOOOOOO! haha.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...