Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

LOL. You're a jerk!

You deserve a chin shot for that!

Got your brakes yet farken?

Haha! Aaaw.. Now don't be like that.

Mmm... Brakes.. Nah they'll be a couple of weeks away yet apparently.

No rush seeing as mine is "Parked" like Yours anyway...!

Haha! Aaaw.. Now don't be like that.

Mmm... Brakes.. Nah they'll be a couple of weeks away yet apparently.

No rush seeing as mine is "Parked" like Yours anyway...!

Still sitting in the corner thinking about what it's done?

Have sticky beak!

Here is an interesting little comparison.

On the left we have a Tomei procam which was in my old head. The profile was 270 @ 10.25mm. On the left we have a JUN 264 @ 10.5mm. The shape is quite a bit different.

2eaf4d6c.jpg

d5e5d7e6.jpg

1e66a89f.jpg

.... I don't know if that coating is going to last Paul. I mean look at it...

But ah... I don't want to burst your bubble or anything...

GOLD !!

Jun looks more rounded and not as peaky, keeps the valve open longer

Tomei is perky and the Jun is nice and full (using the analogy of Edgar Brits)

Marko that last line of yours sound more like spruiking at a Japanese whore house !!

Jun looks more rounded and not as peaky, keeps the valve open longer

Tomei is perky and the Jun is nice and full (using the analogy of Edgar Brits)

Except the tomei is the one on the left and is the one that more rounded due to more duration

Except the tomei is the one on the left and is the one that more rounded due to more duration

You would think that. I had a 260 @ 9.15 poncam there too and it looked the same at the 270 (As in the big fat round nose) . Should have put that in the photo too. I'll do that when i'm out there next. Very interesting.

What I did notice just by running your finger over the lobe, the JUN has a 'bump' where the 'start of duration' starts. ALOT more pronounced than the procam. It obviously ramps open alot faster/harder than the tomei.

Dammit I just re read my post. The JUN is on the right. What a bloody noob!

Well mate I demand a back to back comparison. That's the only way to be sure. Plus you'll be doing the GTR community a great service - which I know will make you warm and fuzzy.

Tomei first? :)

Well mate I demand a back to back comparison. That's the only way to be sure. Plus you'll be doing the GTR community a great service - which I know will make you warm and fuzzy.

Tomei first? :)

haha. There will be a back to back. "that" project is humming along quite nicely ;).

The Tomei's are Ratshit. I spose thats what happens when they weld themselves to the cam caps. They can't be reused and will be cut up at some point for 'the project'.

Haha! Aaaw.. Now don't be like that.

Mmm... Brakes.. Nah they'll be a couple of weeks away yet apparently.

No rush seeing as mine is "Parked" like Yours anyway...!

Got forbid all three of our cars were to be on the road at once lol

No doubt it's something to do with the balance of nature... Law of the jungle.. To prevent the earth spinning backwards if all 3 of us launch in 3rd at the same time...

... Or, I just keep breaking shit.

It's one of those two I reckon... : P

I was out there again today watching a mates SR getting tuned. I pulled out the cams to compare to the "260 @ 9.15's" to the rest from the other night.

Again from the left are the Tomei 270 @ 10.25, middle is JUN 264 @ 10.5 and right is Tomei 260 @ 9.15.

09128a54.jpg

fea07846.jpg

fea07846.jpg

The JUN's are definately more "triangle" than the Tomei's in both "Procam or Poncam". Yavuz is going to map the lift VS duration and lay it out on a piece of paper. I'd like to do a set of standard cams just for shits and giggles. I'm sure I have a set laying around somewhere.

So I would have thought that the Tomei profile would be preferred at first glance.

I know there is a lot more to it, but with the Tomei being more 'square' than than the JUN 'triangle' it's going to have more area under the curve. So the valve must accelerate faster on the opening and be 'more open' for longer, no?

In theory if you could open the valve almost instantly and keep it fully open for its given duration then that would be ideal, the Tomei looks closer to this.

So I would have thought that the Tomei profile would be preferred at first glance.

I know there is a lot more to it, but with the Tomei being more 'square' than than the JUN 'triangle' it's going to have more area under the curve. So the valve must accelerate faster on the opening and be 'more open' for longer, no?

In theory if you could open the valve almost instantly and keep it fully open for its given duration then that would be ideal, the Tomei looks closer to this.

I had the same assumption. I asked Yavuz about this and he waffle quite technical. As I said, he is going to measure the profile and have it on a piece of paper so we can see it on a graph. He was saying the more 'triangular or pointy' it is the better.... But also the harder it is on valve train. Pfft. Harder.

If the 'sponge bob' cams are anything to go by, they will be ALOT more aggressive than this. ;)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I was 99% sure the standard one is long enough to get there, you might just have to change the throttle orientation. If not, I remember someone having used an r31 cable instead, but that is probably harder to find than r33 by now...
    • HELP   Hey all, Is there an accelerator cable from another Nissan that can be used on the R33 GTST RB25DET with a Greddy forward facing plenum?  Thanks in advance  Rob 
    • Or do we think it was installed to give 1 bar of boost max, all day, everyday?
    • So could it be assumed it has been installed intentionally with potentially a power FC boost controller kit? 
    • Had my rig on Matt's dyno at PITS the other day. After a few years between tunes I added a few sensors and swapped intercoolers. Result. 553hp at 26psi. Not bad for an FJ20 that was built in 2007. The problem.. It filled the overflow bottle on hard runs which leads me to believe the head gasket isn't sealing. I have a coolant pressure sensor which was reading cap pressure at 22psi and occasionally overrunning to 23/24 psi on deceleration after a pull. It was not spiking. It has arp2000 head studs and a cometic gasket. As its been 18 years in service, I pulled the engine out and head off. Everything looks good but we obviously have an issue. Where I'm at.. Years ago I had the same issue, I checked the stud tension and they were all over the place. Some at 60 to 70 and some up near 90. I nipped them all to 100ft lbs and this stopped the water push until now. I believe this compromised the gasket back then. What do I do? 2 options are..  1) I bought arp 625+s, which I could put in with a new gasket. Thinking Kameari this time, reassemble and try again. 2) strip the block, get fire rings machined in with copper gasket and try that. I do not want to push it more than 28 to 30psi. I think the turbo will be out by then anyway. (G30-770). My other concern is the long term ability of a copper head gasket. Are they streetable for years? I feel like a new gasket with the new studs will probably suffice, but I don't know. Any thoughts welcome and advice on copper gaskets and fire rings. Thanks!
×
×
  • Create New...