Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Anyone bought one of these Apexi pod filter kits that bolt on to the AFM and have a direct dyno comparisson to before and after, with nothing else changed other than the removal of the oe airbox and the fitting of the kit?

I'm considering buying one, but I'm not sure if it's worth it. Keen to hear of anyone's results.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/
Share on other sites

  • Replies 65
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Without a heatshield, it will cost you a tiny bit of power, with a proper heatshield and CAI it will make around the same amount of power as the airbox. The pod will make for a lot more induction noise than the airbox as well, up to you if you want that or not.

Check these vids out if you have a bit of spare time

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6363349
Share on other sites

Mate there are many differing opinions, however if you put a pod filter on, the air intake capacity increases. You will see no gain by simply changing from standard intake to a pod. You need to improve airflow capacity from intake through to exhaust. Meaning if you have a larger exhaust from the turbo back then a pod filter will certainly help. The stanadard airbox alone is restricting air flow.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6363739
Share on other sites

Mate there are many differing opinions, however if you put a pod filter on, the air intake capacity increases. You will see no gain by simply changing from standard intake to a pod. You need to improve airflow capacity from intake through to exhaust. Meaning if you have a larger exhaust from the turbo back then a pod filter will certainly help. The stanadard airbox alone is restricting air flow.

How will it increase airflow, by sucking hot air? Not filtering dust out? Pods usually have less surface area than the stock panel filter.

My opinions are based on experience. Stock airbox/cai ftw.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6363753
Share on other sites

Mate there are many differing opinions, however if you put a pod filter on, the air intake capacity increases. You will see no gain by simply changing from standard intake to a pod. You need to improve airflow capacity from intake through to exhaust. Meaning if you have a larger exhaust from the turbo back then a pod filter will certainly help. The stanadard airbox alone is restricting air flow.

An old argument but do you have evidence for this? I am sure there is a point at which the stock airbox will become a restriction but I suspect it is somewhere way past 300kw.
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6363789
Share on other sites

I agree Bob, I guess it will flow well over 350, I know mine can and it uses the same panel filter. Save your coin for a good alloy intake and bellmouth dump/good exhaust. The tuner will take care of the rest.

If you want more power than that you would have to look at a twin pod setup and cai like this one I made for a mate's supra, it just put down 550kw last night.

post-63525-0-21149600-1337526498_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6363807
Share on other sites

CES racing have proved this with substantial evidence... Its interesting how these videos of proof by mighty car mods are hardly mighty mods. They use an R34 with pod then restricted air flow from the turbo to the cat to a cat back exhaust, that right there is pure wank factor to replace an exhaust from the cat back and leave the other half chocking your airflow. Then in the other video its the blue turd, this car is running a standard exhaust of course there will be no increase in power...

Hardly proves anything... The surface area of a panel filter may be greater than a pod but the shape of a pod causes a greater turbulence thus increasing the flow... The standard airbox was designed to restrict airflow to minimise the sound levels.

Why dont you just say that a larger exhaust will do nothing as well... If you believe that the exhaust being larger will increase power it only makes sense that an unrestricted air intake will help with the flow of air...

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6364072
Share on other sites

CES racing have proved this with substantial evidence... Its interesting how these videos of proof by mighty car mods are hardly mighty mods. They use an R34 with pod then restricted air flow from the turbo to the cat to a cat back exhaust, that right there is pure wank factor to replace an exhaust from the cat back and leave the other half chocking your airflow. Then in the other video its the blue turd, this car is running a standard exhaust of course there will be no increase in power...

Hardly proves anything... The surface area of a panel filter may be greater than a pod but the shape of a pod causes a greater turbulence thus increasing the flow... The standard airbox was designed to restrict airflow to minimise the sound levels.

Why dont you just say that a larger exhaust will do nothing as well... If you believe that the exhaust being larger will increase power it only makes sense that an unrestricted air intake will help with the flow of air...

Its true the above videos are not that scientific but they do represent what a lot of first time (especially Skyline) owners do - get a pod filter and a catback exhaust - closely followed by a noisy aftermarket bov.

Its not a matter of belief... its measurement that counts. There is plenty of research to show the optimum size of exhaust pipe required for different power levels. Similarly the size of air intake is important too and the restriction provided by the air filter ( I am assuming you do not advocate running with no airfilter on a street car) is minimal and the measured difference between pod and stock airfilters is even more minimal. The stock airbox and snorkel also has a small ram effect which helps with flow.

Do you have any evidence to support your assertion that "the shape of a pod causes a greater turbulence thus increasing airflow" (actually that's two assertions)?

When you are running a huge turbo that requires a 100mm or bigger intake then it can become impractical to use the stock airbox and you will need another form of cold air supply.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6364241
Share on other sites

The airbox is unrestricted, its the intake that thins down to 40mm and requires upgrading. (not with the stock turbo though.) As Bob said, when you decide to build the engine, run a 3.5 inch exhaust with no cat and run a 600hp turbo, then you will need to look at the airbox being a restriction.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6364607
Share on other sites

CES racing have proved this with substantial evidence... Its interesting how these videos of proof by mighty car mods are hardly mighty mods. They use an R34 with pod then restricted air flow from the turbo to the cat to a cat back exhaust, that right there is pure wank factor to replace an exhaust from the cat back and leave the other half chocking your airflow. Then in the other video its the blue turd, this car is running a standard exhaust of course there will be no increase in power...

Hardly proves anything... The surface area of a panel filter may be greater than a pod but the shape of a pod causes a greater turbulence thus increasing the flow... The standard airbox was designed to restrict airflow to minimise the sound levels.

Why dont you just say that a larger exhaust will do nothing as well... If you believe that the exhaust being larger will increase power it only makes sense that an unrestricted air intake will help with the flow of air...

turbulent air actually has higher resistance compared to laminar flow, plus you run the risk of getting an uneven air flow over the maf

know much about reynolds numbers?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6364610
Share on other sites

Im sure my TO4Z dragging in air at 24lb would be creating a bit more turbulance than a little bit of wire in a POD, a POD is only a advantage if it has a heat shield and CAI on motors that need more unrestricted air flow, try doing a hydrometer test on the intake pipe to see any difference.

Results cannot be taken on the dyno, results need to be done whislt the car has the bonnet down on the road/track, if you want a accurate result do a hydrometer test, otherwise you are just pissing in the wind.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6364633
Share on other sites

Results cannot be taken on the dyno, results need to be done whislt the car has the bonnet down on the road/track

Why?

Close the bonnet and let the dyno fan run. The Mainline fan blows air at the car at 100km/h, which is exactly what you'd see on the road/track whilst driving at 100km/h; I dont see how its different.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6364642
Share on other sites

I have a HKS Mushroom Pod. I don't have a lot of choice regarding the room I have - the cooler piping runs right through the place where the stock box sat.

I also made sure that I have a large amount of fresh air feeding it- up from the fnt bar. I don't really understand the HKS specific pod bashing. There may have been ones that fell apart after X years. Thats really not a good thing. But they do have a 3 layer filtration foam, its not just that coarse layer you see from the outside, which wouldn't filter well at all. Same quality as a panel? Probably not, but its not as hopeless as people make out.

As for temps- on the freeway / moving I've been seeing 22-25 degrees measured basically at the throttle body. My AFM is after the filter/turbo/intercooler. I'd say thats pretty acceptable, and its not sucking in hot air.

However, If I had a choice, it'd be to keep the stock airbox/panel. Getting a pod for the sake of it, just not worth it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/400611-pod-filter-kit/#findComment-6364883
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • This is for an RB20DET. Sorry for not including that. 
    • Welp, this is where my compression lands after my rebuild. Thoughts? I have ~6 hours on the motor. 
    • Well, after the full circus this week (new gearbag, 14 psi actuator on, injectors and AFM upgraded, and.....turbo repair) the diagnosis on the wastegate is in. It was broken. It was broken in a really strange way. The weld that holds the lever arm onto the wastegate flapper shaft broke. Broke completely, but broke in such a way that it could go back together in the "correct" position, or it could rearrange itself somewhere else along the fracture plane and sit with the flapper not parallel to the lever. So, who knows how and when exactly what happened? No-one will ever know. Was it broken like this the first time it spat the circlip and wedged itself deep into the dump? Or was it only broken when I tried to pry it back into place? (I didn't try that hard, but who knows?). Or did it break first? Or did it break between the first and second event of wierdness? Meh. It doesn't matter now. It is welded back together. And it is now held closed by a 14 psi actuator, so...the car has been tuned with the supporting mods (and the order of operations there is that the supporting mods and dyno needed to be able to be done first before adding boost, because it was pinging on <<14 psi with the new turbo with only a 6 psi actuator). And then tuned up a bit, and with the boost controller turned off throughout that process. So it was only running WG pressure and so only hit about 15-16 psi. The turbo is still ever so slightly lazier than might be preferred - like it is still a bit on the big side for the engine. I haven't tested it on the road properly in any way - just driven it around in traffic for a half hour or so. But it is like chalk and cheese compared to what it was. Between dyno numbers and driving feedback: It makes 100 kW at 3k rpm, which is OK, could be better. That's stock 2JZ territory, or RB20 with G series 550. It actually starts building boost from 2k, which is certainly better than it did recently (with all the WG flapper bullshit). Although it's hard to remember what it was like prior to all that - it certainly seems much, much better. And that makes sense, given the WG was probably starting to blow open at anything above about 3 psi anyway (with the 6 psi actuator). It doesn't really get to "full boost" (say 16 psi) until >>4k rpm. I am hopeful that this is a feature of the lack of boost controller keeping boost pressure off the actuator, because it was turned off for the dyno and off for the drives afterward. There's more to be found here, I'm sure. It made 230 rwkW at not a lot more than 6k and held it to over 7k, so there seems to be plenty of potential to get it up to 250-260rwkW with 18 psi or so, which would be a decent effort, considering the stock sized turbo inlet pipework and AFM, and the return flow cooler. According to Tao, those things should definitely put a bit of a limit on it by that sort of number. I must stress that I have not opened the throttle 100% on the road yet - well, at least not 100% and allowed it to wind all the way up. It'll have to wait until some reasonable opportunity. I'm quite looking forward to that - it feels massively better than it has in a loooong time. It's back to its old self, plus about 20% extra powers over the best it ever did before. I'm going to get the boost controller set up to maximise spool and settle at no more than ~17 psi (for now) and then go back on the dyno to see what we can squeeze out of it. There is other interesting news too. I put together a replacement tube to fit the R35 AFM in the stock location. This is the first time the tuner has worked with one, because anyone else he has tuned for has gone from Z32 territory to aftermarket ECU. No-one has ever wanted to stay Nistuned and do what I've done. Anyway, his feedback is that the R35 AFM is super super super responsive. Tiny little changes in throttle position or load turn up immediately as a cell change on the maps. Way, way more responsive than any of the old skool AFMs. Makes it quite diffifult to tune as you have to stay right on top of that so you don't wander off the cell you wanted to tune. But it certainly seems to help with real world throttle response. That's hard to separate from all the other things that changed, but the "pedal feel" is certainly crisp.
    • I'm a bit confused by this post, so I'll address the bit I understand lol.  Use an air compressor and blow away the guide coat sanding residue. All the better if you have a moisture trap for your compressor. You'd want to do this a few times as you sand the area, you wouldn't for example sand the entire area till you think its perfect and then 'confirm' that is it by blowing away the guide coat residue.  Sand the area, blow away the guide coat residue, inspect the panel, back to sanding... rinse and repeat. 
×
×
  • Create New...