Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys,

I sold a motor a few months ago. It was comp tested and was running great.

I sold the motor as a long motor.

I got a message 2 months later saying the motor has been pulled apart and is stuffed.

He said he is going to sue me.

I didnt even provide a receipt.

He has my name and bank details, my phone number and a few txt messages saying that the motor is in good running condition.

Apart from that he just has the motor in pieces and letters from a mechanic saying the motor is no good.

Can he sue me? Should I be worried? Do I need to contact my own lawyer?

Im in NSW and the motor went to S.A. Who do I contact for more info on how these situations are handled? Fair trading?

Any info is much appreciated guys.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/
Share on other sites

If he can prove he took the same motor you sent him, and without doing anything else to it, he stripped it and found it to be obviously faulty, then there may be a case. If he had it for 2 months, how can he prove that he hasn't destroyed it himself? just because a mechanic can confirm that it is indeed faulty doesn't mean that it was that way when he received it.

Maybe if it's full of rust (or some other fault that is unlikely to have occurred in a 2 month period), he may have a way to prove that the motor was faulty when he got it. Otherwise, what's to say he didn't cause the damage himself?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6372698
Share on other sites

These transactions have a "concrete warranty" - the one that states that "once it's off my concrete, what warranty?"

I think the dude has very little chance of being at all successful in his pursuit of you over this. As stated, who knows what happened to the engeine during the 2 months in question.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6372763
Share on other sites

Private sales of cars and car related gear don't come under any sort of consumer code of practice / trade practices act etc., so you're not bound to offer any warranty. My comment on it being rusty was the only way I could think of him being able to prove you've sold hi a dud which could not possibly have been operational at the time of sale (ie it has been sitting in the weather for the last 10 years, has rusted up and you're passing it off as a running engine). Not suggesting that this is what happened - it was the only way I could think of that he might have any proof of what condition the engine was in 2 months ago.

Apart from that, I'd say his case is extremely slim.

If he hasn't got a receipt (or any other communication ) with the engine number on it, then how can he even prove it was your engine?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6372792
Share on other sites

Yeah this is what I'm hoping. It's stressful but I'm almost sure nothing will happen. He has access to a free lawyer so he is keen to take it as far as he can.

Honestly I can't see how a judge would even look at the case if there is no receipt and no proof that the engine he has is the same one I sold him.

Thanks for the input guys!

Edited by 25GTV
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6372836
Share on other sites

Once i sold a 4x4 to a guy in melbourne. It was running fine. He got it picked up by a transporter truck here in Sydney and taken down to him.

A few weeks later i got a fine in the mail from victoria, so i called him to find out why he hadnt transferred rego into his name yet.

He told me, he'd fix it up, and by the way.... the engine blew up. We both laughed, and life went on.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6372872
Share on other sites

Let the buyer beware, is a common thread running through the law of contract.

In this private sale of a car its bad luck for the buyer. As was stated earlier the laws that apply to retal sales dont apply to a private sale.

Ignore all further communication other wise you will stress yourself out un-necessarliy.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6372916
Share on other sites

As said he has nothing to stand on, what matters is what you can prove and there's a difference between pulling apart an engine the day after you buy it and 2 months down the track.

All this court talk is horse shit too, the proper avenue is VCAT or the state equivalent over minor claims like this. lol @ even getting a lawyer involved over less than 5k worth of damages.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6372996
Share on other sites

Better yet, tell him that if he was hanging by one arm from the edge of a cliff, and you were standing on top...and you had an overflowing pocket full of f**ks...you wouldn't give him one.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6373116
Share on other sites

There's not a lot of information to go off here, I'm interested in what findings were made in the engine report for starters and the circumstances leading up to it.

Depends, If you advetised an engine that was in a certain condition and he can provide enough evidence that it did not live up to the condition as advertised he can make a case of it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6373121
Share on other sites

There's not a lot of information to go off here, I'm interested in what findings were made in the engine report for starters and the circumstances leading up to it.

Depends, If you advetised an engine that was in a certain condition and he can provide enough evidence that it did not live up to the condition as advertised he can make a case of it.

but then he also has to prove that you knew that there was an issue with it and you falsely advertised it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6373132
Share on other sites

but then he also has to prove that you knew that there was an issue with it and you falsely advertised it.

For all I know the buyer of the engine could have thrashed the guts out of it.

I've found in the courts that ignorance is not bliss, if you have advertised a product and its found not in the condition as advertised, with the right evidence they can make the seller accountable for it.

Who knows with this one, like I said not enough info and only one side of the story.

More than likely nothing will come of this.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6373216
Share on other sites

Pretty sure he can take you to court, but based on what you've said there's no way he'll win. Its probably not worth discussing it with him either because you may accidentally say something that harms your case. Its unlikely he's stupid enough to take it to court, and he's just trying to get money out of you. Just say the motor was running fine when you sold it and you have nothing more to say. If required, let him know he cant harass you with the phone (Telecommunications Act).

"Improper use of telecommunications services

"85ZE. A person shall not knowingly or recklessly:

(a) use a telecommunications service supplied by a carrier to menace or

harass another person; or

(b) use a telecommunications service supplied by a carrier in such a way as

would be regarded by reasonable persons as being, in all the circumstances,

offensive.

Penalty: Imprisonment for 1 year."

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/401124-can-i-be-sued/#findComment-6373277
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The fab work can be as simple as a couple of silicon hoses and clamps to the factory piping. 
    • Just sounds like either way you need to do some fab work to get everything to fit, so why limit yourself at that point? If the GCG high flow option is zero effort in and out swap though I'd probably do that. It's almost certainly lowest risk, lowest cost, etc. The HKS GTIII-RS option that Kapr mentioned is laughably expensive for what it is, they charge the exact same for two turbos on the RB26 so their margins are off the charts on that thing.
    • Intake manifold is not a part of the issue. The turbo bolts to the exhaust manifold. That is easy. But close your eyes and picture the physical situation. That is a T3 flange on the manifold and a T3 flange on the turbo. As long as any new turbo has a T3 flange on the exhaust housing, that exhaust housing will bolt to the exhaust manifold. This places the exhaust housing in the same place as the stock one. But now move your mental attention a little further forward. The location of the compressor housing is set by the length of the turbo's core. The stock turbo had a long core. Let's say that it is..... 100mm long. So that would place the compressor housing 100mm forward of the exhaust housing. But a highflow, might well have a centre core that is shorter. Let's say that it is only 70mm long. Now the compressor housing will be 30mm further back in the engine bay than the stock one. This DOES move the turbo's compressor outlet backwards. It also moves the compressor's inlet backwards. You will very likely have to do some work to both the inlet and outlet piping to make everything connect again. I am not say this to make it out to be a bigger deal than it is. I am just pointing out that "bolt on" is sometimes not quite bolt on. The highflow from GCG that Murray linked above (https://gcg.com.au/turbo-charger-upgrade-skyline-gtst-2iu-xtrgts-s1.html ) uses a core that is the same length as the stock core, and so does not require this extra work. It will look very much like the stock turbo. No-one uses GTR turbos of any flavour (stock, or aftermarket) in a single turbo application on RB20/25. It's not a thing. Yes, people have been putting on GT3076, GTX3076 (and bigger and smaller versions of those) and G30s (of various sizes) onto RB20/25 since forever. But these are not "bolt on". Everything except the 4 bolts to the exhaust manifold change with these. And genuine Garretts are expensive. Non-gen, like Pulsar, etc, are cheaper, variously as good or nearly as good. But still not bolt on. No-one in the right mind would pay for an HKS turbo. Not in this modern day and age. Well, yes, the GCG highflow. You could ask HG what he can do to make the compressor housing sit in the original location. There are surely others doing highflows around the world. And some of the eBay/Temu ones (as reported by Dose) work and don't die. Bit of a lottery though. I would send your turbo to GCG (here in Oz) to be highflowed if you want a trivial no-extra-work option. But seriously, the work required to change inlet and outlet piping is not that hard. That's a boost control problem, not a turbo problem.
    • Thank you all for the replys 🙂 I know that intake would be different but that is one pipe at it is not that hard to get(custom one). I meant mainly bolt to the stock manifold and the turbo elbow. I looked and many sites/forums but they are just "old" with some old HKS turbos from GT-R i guess? What about some Garrets?  Or any other turbo? Is there even a turbo which i can just bolt on? 😄 And yeah i know about that new HKS but that is like 2000k USD without taxes/shipping in here   Iam getting a touch up tune but my "problem" is that on the "not" hot day iam getting peaks around 0,9 bar...and when it was around 15 Celsious i saw peak around 1 bar which is just too much for stock turbo. And of course turbo is old and i like to get some new one for a piece of mind 🙂 
    • I'm working on the assumption that our friend Jasmine here is a Russian (or, possibly Ukrainian) spammer/spambot, based purely on the number of such that I have been having to neuter in the last few weeks. IP address for the OP above was in WA. But that could have been via VPN. Posting at quarter to 4 in the morning is a good sign of being from somewhere in Europe. The last Jasmine that I kicked in the cooch was IP addressed in Ukraine. Even that could have been via VPN, and the bitchbot could have been from Russia, Serbia, China or anywhere. Regardless, was a spambot, so I killed it with fire. The fact that our new friend Jasmine here did not respond in any way to my tart query strongly suggests to me that this OP was just the establishment phase of a user able to be activated for spamming in a week, or 3 or 10.
×
×
  • Create New...