Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Could you give me your input on this 6262 compares to a -5 or -9 setup ? TBH, those numbers do look great on sheet, curious on the street whats your take compared to the ',std benchmark''.

thanks!

Probably similar to -5's on the street, it comes on very hard from 4000rpm

Some helmet video from yesterday's Speed Event Series

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XAnMeOI7IY8

Edited by R31Nismoid
  • 3 weeks later...

Another video from drivers view, this time on long track. Also running Achilles 123S which are not even an r-comp with a "220" treadwear rating but still manage around 2 sec off my best on it's first flying lap.

www.youtube.com/pCAyYM3Xu6o

Also managed to crack my front rotor fairly hard.

20131228_143232_zps67cgakvj.jpg

Edited by SimonR32
  • 2 months later...

Turned up the wick on the old girl and went a little crazy for a street drag tune :)

GTR_zps8966cc25.jpeg

So last time it ran that power on the first run it lifted the head and stretched the standard head studs, we turned it back down and I installed ARP2000 head studs the next day but have never run it at that power.

Went back for a quick check on the dyno on Saturday before Racewars this year and it made pretty much the same power with no problems lifting the head again. Was missing very slightly so I need to chuck in a new set of plugs and drop the gaps down a little but apart from that was very happy to see it making basically the same power. Was tempted to push for a little more but I think this is more than adequate for a stock bottom end and stock gearbox :)

20140330_183028_zpsqxojvqb6.jpg

  • Like 1
  • 2 weeks later...

What do you think of the achilles 123s tyres?

They are good, less than 2 sec slower than my AD050's on a 60 odd second lap.

They do seem to shag out a fair bit but I do punish them, think they have had 3 or 4 tracks days so far so I'll probably get another 3 out of them

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...