Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi Guys,

Im wanting to build a reliable 500hp Rb25 and im wanting to know how and what parts would achieve this.

Its going to be my daily along with a few track days. What parts do you guys recomment that will make/handle this power?

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/413751-how-to-build-500hp-rb25/
Share on other sites

I think what they're trying to say is, there's already plenty of info on here. Do you mean 500 crank HP or 500 rear wheel HP? Would you be happy with 470 crank HP or 300rwkw?

Best resource: http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/topic/55845-rb25-turbo-upgrade-all-dyno-results/

44 pages of RB25 goodness, from 150rwkw to 700rwkw.....

And if you search "500 HP RB25" it's the 6th result.......

For me, I think a reliable 500whp (but not much over) RB is as follows:

Upgrade valve springs and retainers

Appropriate cams

Forged pistons

Entry level H beam rods

Larger capacity sump

Oil pump drive collar

Quality oil pump

Oil restrictors to head (see KiwiRS4T sig for a collar and restrictor deal)

Head studs

With that stuff there and a 35R sized turbo you will have a good reliable engine that will do your 500whp everyday and wont end up letting you down.

You can skip the internal work and replace the motor when/if it dies possibly every year or two. This is a guestimate.

Please note the general consensus is that 20k is not enough to turn a stock skyline into a 500whp machine and 30k is more likely.

fuark that's sexy.. I like how the turbo is mounted, allows for the power steering reservoir to remain where it is... the dump probably presses on the A/C drip aye?

  • 3 years later...
  • 1 month later...
On 26/10/2016 at 5:06 PM, CaptBaker said:

is there a parts list/ some sort of "build thread" for this?

T67-25g Greddy turbo kit.

850cc BLITZ injectors

Greddy intake plenum ( tested stock vs the current q45 throttle and found no diff in power)

115mm greddy R-spec intercooler

Greddy race radiator

Greddy Header tank

Trust Titanium exhaust

GREDDY heat range 9 pro plugs (use denso IK01-24 now as the greddy are impossibly expensive even in NGK format)

PowerFC (soon to be emtron KV8)

Car also now has TOPSTAGE carbon front diffuser and Rear wing.

 

 

This car will lap winton or phillip island non stop without getting hot or having any IAT issues, we did a 30 lap test session with JT and our VK twin turbo LS1 to check endurance.

 

jt vk 2.jpg

jt vk.jpg

  • Like 1

Hi Mate,

I'm not too far off (430hp at 16psi on 98). I'm aiming for 500hp, I hope the below helps, I will be there soon (fuel system is currently being upgraded).

You probably don't need to do everything I did but at-least you can get a picture on what is needed:

  1. Gt35r turbo
  2. FMIC
  3. GReddy wastegate (60mm...i think)
  4. 6boost manifold
  5. ecu/boost management (I'm using a PFC and profec b)
  6. I had nismo 555cc injectors on stock rail (now have 1000cc's, turbosmart fuel reg and sorting surge tank/pumps)
  7. 260deg 9.25mm lift Tomei type b cams (from memory) with headwork done + springs
  8. forged pistons
  9. forged rods
  10. upgraded coil packs
  11. all the additional engine equipment (harmonic balancers, belts etc etc)
  12. larger sump with head oil drain
  13. I have a 3'' zorst. I've been told this is okay, but I would increase to 3.5"
  14. Plazmaman plenum
  15. clutch
  16. Not to mention blockwork- honing etc
  17. radiator

That's about all I can remember now, that doesn't take into account everything else that you will need. Suspension, brakes etc.

You could always to e85, but for practicality I can't justify it at the moment.

There was a lady on here a few years ago that really helped me out, but she was running a T04Z. Perhaps search rb25 T04Z, her build guide was excellent.

Agree with GTSSCOTT- your looking at about $10-15k to build the engine if you just do the basics.

13668992_10154330564827510_4643053593968356568_n.jpg

Edited by r33cruiser
  • Like 1

You can make that power with less parts and the right parts too.

Best to look into something twin scroll, divided rear housing and ball bearing.. I won't throw turbo models around because it would start a holy war LOL

If you can settle for less power, a low 300kw rb25 is a lot cheaper to build/run reliably than a 400kw one.

You can even skip the whole rebuild the engine drama if you want to (head gasket is probably a good idea along with better valve springs if you are running decent boost), lots of cooling (engine and oil) and stick to e85 or add wmi for safety when going harder on it.

Hi Mate,
I'm not too far off (430hp at 16psi on 98). I'm aiming for 500hp, I hope the below helps, I will be there soon (fuel system is currently being upgraded).
You probably don't need to do everything I did but at-least you can get a picture on what is needed:
  1. Gt35r turbo
  2. FMIC
  3. GReddy wastegate (60mm...i think)
  4. 6boost manifold
  5. ecu/boost management (I'm using a PFC and profec b)
  6. I had nismo 555cc injectors on stock rail (now have 1000cc's, turbosmart fuel reg and sorting surge tank/pumps)
  7. 260deg 9.25mm lift Tomei type b cams (from memory) with headwork done + springs
  8. forged pistons
  9. forged rods
  10. upgraded coil packs
  11. all the additional engine equipment (harmonic balancers, belts etc etc)
  12. larger sump with head oil drain
  13. I have a 3'' zorst. I've been told this is okay, but I would increase to 3.5"
  14. Plazmaman plenum
  15. clutch
  16. Not to mention blockwork- honing etc
  17. radiator
That's about all I can remember now, that doesn't take into account everything else that you will need. Suspension, brakes etc.
You could always to e85, but for practicality I can't justify it at the moment.
There was a lady on here a few years ago that really helped me out, but she was running a T04Z. Perhaps search rb25 T04Z, her build guide was excellent.
Agree with GTSSCOTT- your looking at about $10-15k to build the engine if you just do the basics.
13668992_10154330564827510_4643053593968356568_n.jpg


Really helpful!
Is that 430hp at the engine or wheels ?
Cheers

Yep.

If you are looking to go down the built engine road there will be many costs that you have to take into consideration. Its the small things like:

bearings, electrical work, you might have to replace stock parts like the C.A.S, thermostat, you might need to do some custom fab work etc etc.

Extra costs can quickly add up to $5k in themselves.

We don't mean to scare you off, its a great experience. I stupidly began my build thinking it would be "drive in, drive out"- its not haha

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Or just wire a multimeter in, sit it up like it's a gauge, go for a drive, read temp gauge, read multimeter, speak to phone and tell it to take notes.
    • This is the other log file, if only we had exhaust manifold pressure - would understand what's going on a bit better   Can you take a screenshot of your wastegate setup in the Kebabtech?   Engine Functions --> Boost Control (looks like this):  
    • You just need a datalogger of some sort. A handheld oscilloscope could do it, because it will make the trace visible on screen, so you can look at the peak, or whatever you need to look at. And there are cheap USB voltage loggers available too. You could get a 2 channel one and press a button to feed voltage to the second channel at points that you want to check the sensor voltage, when you knew what the guage was saying, for example.
    • it's not the issue with making power, it's the issue with controlling boost, and this isn't the first time I've seen a 6Boost having issue with controlling boost down low.   The boost control here looks interesting.   Looking at your logs, looks like it's set to open loop boost control strategy (which is fine). We can see VCT being kept on till about 6600RPM (no issue with that). Ignition timing (I'm assuming this is E85, seems within reason too, nothing too low, causing hot EGTS and boost spiking). There's about 15 degrees of advance when your boost shoots up, however can't be this as the timing isn't single digits. I'm assuming there's no EMAP data, as I wasn't able to find it in the logs. We can see your tuner sets the WG DC to 0% after 4300RPM, trying to control boost.   My thoughts, what frequency is your wastegate set to?  AND why aren't you using both ports for better control?
    • While that sounds reasonable, this is definitely a boost control problem, but the real question is why are you having the boost control problem? Which is why I pondered the idea that there's a problem at ~4000rpm related to head flow. In that instance, you are not yet under boost control - it's still ramping up and the wastegate is yet to gain authority. So, I'm thinking that if the wastegate is not yet open enough to execute control, but the compressor has somehow managed ot make a lot of flow, and the intake side of the head doesn't flow as well as the exhaust side (more on that later), then presto, high MAP (read that as boost overshoot). I have a number of further thoughts. I use butterfly valves in industrial applications ALL THE TIME. They have a very non-linear flow curve. That is to say that there is a linear-ish region in the middle of their opening range, where a 1% change in opening will cause a reasonably similar change in flow rate, from one place to another. So, maybe between 30% open and 60% open, that 1% change in opening gives you a similar 2% change in flow. (That 2% is pulled out of my bum, and is 2% of the maximum flow capacity of the valve, not 2% of the flow that happens to be going through the valve at that moment). That means that at 30% open, a 1% change in opening will give you a larger relative flow increase (relative to the flow going through the valve right then) compared to the same increment in opening giving you the same increment in flow in outright flow units. But at 60% opening, that extra 2% of max flow is relatively less than 1/2 the increase at 30% opening. Does that make sense? It doesn't matter if it doesn't because it's not the main point anyway. Below and above the linear-ish range in the middle, the opening-flow curve becomes quite...curved. Here's a typical butterfy valve flow curve. Note that there is a very low slope at the bottom end, quite steep linear-ish slope in the middle, then it rolls off to a low slope at the top. This curve shows the "gain" that you get from a butterfly valve as a function of opening%. Note the massive spike in the curve at 30%. That's the point I was making above that could be hard to understand. So here's the point I'm trying to make. I don't know if a butterfly valve is actually a good candiate for a wastegate. A poppet valve of some sort has a very linear flow curve as a function of opening %. It can't be anyelse but linear. It moves linearly and the flow area increases linearly with opening %. I can't find a useful enough CV curve for a poppet valve that you could compare against the one I showed for the butterfly, but you can pretty much imagine that it will not have that lazy, slow increase in flow as it comes off the seat. It will start flowing straight away and increase flow very noticeably with every increase in opening%. So, in your application, you're coming up onto boost, the wastegate is closed. Boost ramps up quite quickly, because that's really what we want, and all of a sudden it is approaching target boost and the thing needs to open. So it starts opening, and ... bugger all flow. And it opens some more, and bugger all more flow. And all the while time is passing, boost is overshooting further, and then finally the WG opens to the point where the curve starts to slope upwards and it gains authority amd the overshoot is brought under control and goes away, but now the bloody thing is too open and it has to go back the other way and that's hy you get that bathtub curve in your boost plot. My position here is that the straight gate is perhaps not teh good idea it looks like. It might work fine in some cases, and it might struggle in others. Now, back to the head flow. I worry that the pissy little NA Neo inlet ports, coupled with the not-very-aggressive Neo turbo cam, mean that the inlet side is simply not matched to the slightly ported exhaust side coupled with somewhat longer duration cam. And that is not even beginning to address the possibility that the overlap/relative timing of those two mismatched cams might make that all the worse at around 4000rpm, and not be quite so bad at high rpm. I would be dropping in at least a 260 cam in the inlet, if not larger, see what happens. I'd also be thinking very hard about pulling the straight gate off, banging a normal gate on there and letting it vent to the wild, just as an experiment.
×
×
  • Create New...