Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Where the HICAS solenoids used to be!! If you haven't pulled all that out....do so.

oh its getting done dont worry, thats shits coming out with the engine when i do the sump along with other things

good suggestion though

  • Replies 172
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

A few kW, and also avoiding teh fuel getting hot enought to flash to vapour in the suction side of pumps. Which tends to result in a sudden stoppage.

This. When fuel gets hot it causes a vapour lock in the fuel system. Pressure pump starves - car runs like shit, stalls and possibly leans out under load.

Fuel cooler is also good to help prevent knocking.

Here's some purpose made fuel coolers: http://www.summitrac...pe/fuel-coolers

or you could just use an aftermarket trans fluid cooler from Supercheap etc.

Cheers Bob

ive seen a few examples of fuel coolers now where there is on a couple of rows of tubbing, Is this all that is required?

i would have thought that it would need something with a few more rows.

i do like that design though as it "looks" like it has a very solid build and would resist damage from stones/rocks etc

This

http://www.summitrac...80125/overview/

I dont exactly know how it works, im guessing this is very similar to what you have

This is where and how I usually do undercar cores.

These are hollinger and rear diff coolers but could be used as fuel coolers as well.

Simple duct that limits the chances or rock damage, Dont ever put a cooler behind a wheel obviously.

post-20349-0-91966300-1357858761_thumb.jpg

post-20349-0-96058100-1357858763_thumb.jpg

Those coolers have probably seen more of a beating than any GTR ive ever seen and they havent really taken any massive rock strikes, they do accumulate debris from the circuit and require constant cleaning out with an air blower to keep tire rubber and dust out of the cores.

This

http://www.summitrac...80125/overview/

I dont exactly know how it works, im guessing this is very similar to what you have

This requires liquid CO2 to cool the fuel. Not an ideal fuel cooler for most. This is suited to drag racing more so i think.

Looks good Brad, have you mesasured the temperature drop before and after with this set up... i know its oil not fuel, (just for a rough idea)

are those pics off an R32 GTR?

Those are on an R32 GTR yes.

Pretty much every car we build that is going on E85 gets a setup similar to that. Doing one on an R34 GTR today I'm a similar way.

Oil temps are usually around 75deh for those coolers but they require switched pumps to circulate to the coolers. Pumps are on at 75 and off at 60. Hollingers recommended oil temp.

The fuel systems I've done that have actually had temp sensors put in them show a consistency more than a temp drop. Usually surge tank temperature is around 45degress

So back to radiators.

PWR do a 42mm and a 55mm radiator to suit Skylines.

The 42mm is designed to work with the factory clutch fan and shroud. The 55mm will only work with a thermo fan. They recommend a thermo fan on one side of the radiator with no shrouding. They supply brackets to do this. The 55mm rad they do is designed for track use only more or less.

I think the idea of having no shroud and a single fan is to try and promote maximum air flow while the vehicle is in motion. The fan is to help cooling at low speeds/idle.

Is this theory correct?

My question, whats the ideal way to go?

Are you hell bent on buying a PWR one?

I just installed my racepace triple core in my 32 today, went in sweet and it retaines the factory shroud.

From what I've been told by people in the know I don't see a reason to have a radiator so big that it can't retain the factory shroud and fan. Getting a thermo is just going backwards in any case.

If the vehicle is in motion there would be plenty of air passing through the radiator

If you are not in motion or at low speeds, then yes you defiantly need a fan going to draw air through the radiator. A mechanical fan does a better job at this then a thermo. Also having the shroud will be advantageouse in directing air where u want it..

At the end of the day the mechanical fan and shroud will kick a thermos ass if your barely or not moving.. And if you are moving it doesn't matter so much

For the guys who are running their cars up to 100 ° or more I'd be making sure you have a way to monitor knock levels.

Not all tuners account for temps this high and you could be knocking when approaching these temps.

I know it's not the most accurate gauge but using the knock sensor on my pfc, and first few laps at around 80° knock levels about 10-20. Temp usually gets up to 85-90° knock is around 20-35 but if it's a hot day and the temps get to 95° knock levels start to get to 50-70 and I will have to do a cool down lap or two.

Thermo fans are not a step backwards. They are an alternative to a clutch fan. If set up properly and understood they will work as well as a clutch fan.

A lot of fans supplied out there are meant to be push fans. Problems occur when people try to use them as pull fans and don't reverse the blades, or the motors polarity.

Problems also occur when the fans body isn't mounted flush to the radiator core. The fan will draw air from around the fan body instead of through the core if there is a gap between the core and body.

A lot of people also try to use cheap fans of poor blade design and or recycle things like falcon fans that can't be mounted properly to the radiator.

If I'm using fans it's spal or nothing, PWR will supply you brackets to mount a spal can flush on the radiator core and it will be a pull type fan suited to the mounting location.

I do agree that the massivly thick radiators out there aren't nessiary. You want something that's side flow and at least a twin pass preferably triple pass.

Like I wrote about fuel coolers, the longer the fluid if kept inside the radiator the more heat it can potentially disperse.

Like I wrote about fuel coolers, the longer the fluid if kept inside the radiator the more heat it can potentially disperse.

Ah, but that's where logic gets in the way of a good story. If you have a choice of two cores with the same frontal area, but one is a single pass and the other is a (say) double pass, the coolant will spend the same total time in the core. In the single pass it will travel slowly (velocity) through a shorter flow path, and in the double pass it will flow faster (velocity) through a longer path. But the time remains the same (give or take a few % here or there for things like uneven tube counts).

The time remains the exact same. So it is not "the amount of time" that the fluid remains in a core that determines the amount of heat it can shed. The faster velocity through fewer tubes causes the convective heat transfer coefficient to increase (think of it as the turbulence level increasing, although that is not the full reason). That means that you will move more heat between fluid and wall provided you can take it away on the air side of the core, which is not usually a problem - although given the discussion here about fan types and ducting etc, obviously we do run up against those limtis as well. The price you pay for the higher velocity is more pressure drop, but in a cooling system we probably don't worry too much about that. Pressure drop is an issue if comparing single pass intercoolers with double pass ones, or the old Supra type where they had a higher number of shorter tubes flowing vertically. Pressure drop in intercoolers is obviously an important factor, on top of thermal efficiency.

Im not hell bent on a PWR no. But as far as i know they are one of only few if not the only place to get a direct fit to siit an R31.

Im pretty sure an R33 unit will fit but it sits lower and needs new brackets made up. The brackets are easy but the sitting lower part is a concern.

If i do end up with a thermo fan it will be a spal only.

Does anyone know of other very good rads to suit an R31? Obviously a cross flow twin or triple pass would be a good option. Im fairly sure the PWR units are vertical single pass.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I had 3 counts over the last couple of weeks once where i got stranded at a jdm paint yard booking in some work. 2nd time was moving the car into the drive way for the inspection and the 3rd was during the inspection for the co2 leak test. Fix: 1st, car off for a hour and half disconnected battery 10mins 4th try car started 2nd, 5th try started 3rd, countless time starting disconnected battery dude was under the hood listening to the starting sequence fuel pump ect.   
    • This. As for your options - I suggest remote mounting the Nissan sensor further away on a length of steel tube. That tube to have a loop in it to handle vibration, etc etc. You will need to either put a tee and a bleed fitting near the sensor, or crack the fitting at the sensor to bleed it full of oil when you first set it up, otherwise you won't get the line filled. But this is a small problem. Just needs enough access to get it done.
    • The time is always correct. Only the date is wrong. It currently thinks it is January 19. Tomorrow it will say it is January 20. The date and time are ( should be ! ) retrieved from the GPS navigation system.
    • Buy yourself a set of easy outs. See if they will get a good bite in and unthread it.   Very very lucky the whole sender didn't let go while on the track and cost you a motor!
    • Well GTSBoy, prepare yourself further. I did a track day with 1/2 a day prep on Friday, inpromptu. The good news is that I got home, and didn't drive the car into a wall. Everything seemed mostly okay. The car was even a little faster than it was last time. I also got to get some good datalog data too. I also noticed a tiny bit of knock which was (luckily?) recorded. All I know is the knock sensors got recalibrated.... and are notorious for false knock. So I don't know if they are too sensitive, not sensitive enough... or some other third option. But I reduced timing anyway. It wasn't every pull through the session either. Think along the lines of -1 degree of timing for say, three instances while at the top of 4th in a 20 minute all-hot-lap session. Unfortunately at the end of session 2... I noticed a little oil. I borrowed some jack stands and a jack and took a look under there, but as is often the case, messing around with it kinda half cleaned it up, it was not conclusive where it was coming from. I decided to give it another go and see how it was. The amount of oil was maybe one/two small drops. I did another 20 minute session and car went well, and I was just starting to get into it and not be terrified of driving on track. I pulled over and checked in the pits and saw this: This is where I called it, packed up and went home as I live ~20 min from the track with a VERY VERY CLOSE EYE on Oil Pressure on the way home. The volume wasn't much but you never know. I checked it today when I had my own space/tools/time to find out what was going on, wanted to clean it up, run the car and see if any of the fittings from around the oil filter were causing it. I have like.. 5 fittings there, so I suspected one was (hopefully?) the culprit. It became immediately apparent as soon as I looked around more closely. 795d266d-a034-4b8c-89c9-d83860f5d00a.mp4       This is the R34 GTT oil sender connected via an adapter to an oil cooler block I have installed which runs AN lines to my cooler (and back). There's also an oil temp sensor on top.  Just after that video, I attempted to unthread the sensor to see if it's loose/worn and it disintegrated in my hand. So yes. I am glad I noticed that oil because it would appear that complete and utter catastrophic engine failure was about 1 second of engine runtime away. I did try to drill the fitting out, and only succeeded in drilling the middle hole much larger and now there's a... smooth hole in there with what looks like a damn sleeve still incredibly tight in there. Not really sure how to proceed from here. My options: 1) Find someone who can remove the stuck fitting, and use a steel adapter so it won't fatigue? (Female BSPT for the R34 sender to 1/8NPT male - HARD to find). IF it isn't possible to remove - Buy a new block ($320) and have someone tap a new 1/8NPT in the top of it ($????) and hope the steel adapter works better. 2) Buy a new block and give up on the OEM pressure sender for the dash entirely, and use the supplied 1/8 NPT for the oil temp sender. Having the oil pressure read 0 in the dash with the warning lamp will give me a lot of anxiety driving around. I do have the actual GM sensor/sender working, but it needs OBD2 as a gauge. If I'm datalogging I don't actually have a readout of what the gauge is currently displaying. 3) Other? Find a new location for the OEM sender? Though I don't know of anywhere that will work. I also don't know if a steel adapter is actually functionally smart here. It's clearly leveraged itself through vibration of the motor and snapped in half. This doesn't seem like a setup a smart person would replicate given the weight of the OEM sender. Still pretty happy being lucky for once and seeing this at the absolute last moment before bye bye motor in a big way, even if an adapter is apparently 6 weeks+ delivery and I have no way to free the current stuck/potentially destroyed threads in the current oil block.
×
×
  • Create New...