Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm not a diet expert.

There are many that are that you can find on the net.

But if you want my opinion in it's simplest form.

animals and vegetables = 90%

wheat/grain related stuff = 10%

beef, lamb, chicken, fish, pork (if you are an infidel), turk3y, roo, emu etc etc

vegetables of all colours.. the more colours the better.

the way you described the pizza and wrap make them sound much better than how I pictured them initally.

If you are happy with your diet, then fine.

But if you are hitting a platue, it will most likely be diet or rest related.

  • Replies 119
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I would say my diet may be a touch carb heavy some times but is otherwise not bad, I think sleep is a big part, but honestly how can you make yourself sleep better.

I've started going to bed earlier but my real issue is waking up repeatedly be it from temp or being uncomfortable.

Just reading about that, cheers for the suggestion.

Anyone here have experience with it? Supp for more naturally occurring?

A quick read shows foods only contain low amounts.

Its unfair to call it a diet, its just crap he shoves in his mouth

Tolga is a young Markos lol

He too will one day learn the term "wasting your time"

But for now, he needs to experience this

Amusing thread

I was waiting for you to pop in, I just thought you'd have more to add lol

I'll admit I do not follow a strict eating regime, I just try and be mindful of fats and sugars, don't eat too much or too little. As I said earlier, I'm not out to set the weight lifting world on fire. I'm not sure I need to be too hardcore to get what I'm after, but perhaps my goals are much further down the ladder than others.

I'd of thought the preference would be that someone puts it all out there, takes the advice on board and looks to do it better, rather than having another person doing it wrong, or worse, telling others that what they do is right/better when it's not.

Give me some credit :D

Edited by ActionDan

ok serious response.

you have hit a platue where you can bench 87kg for 3 sets of 8, but when you do 88kg, you get 2 sets of 8 and 2 set of 7 right?

this is your platue?

do 88kg for 2 sets.

then wait 3 minutes and do the last set.

problem solved.

your platue isn't really a platue of strength, it's more about recovery in between sets.

just rest more man.... you're at home anyway, not like someones going to come up and ask if you've finished curling in the squat rack.

other choices.

reduce the weight to 80kg and do 10-12 reps

increase the weight to 90 and do 5 reps

increase it to 100 and do 1 or 2 reps.

then after a few weeks go back to 88kg and do 3 x 8 with your designated rest times (which you seem to find important)

The designated rest times are only "important" because I like to not be in the gym foreve. 60-70mins is already enough, I'd be happier with 50-60 which I'd say is do-able with that different routine as there's less time wasted moving plates.

I can work around the bench "plateau" so to speak, but it'll all go out the window next week when I give this different routine a whirl, even if it turns out not to be for me, still better than lifting zero.

Curling in the squat rack, god damn lol that comes up in every pet peeves at the gym thread ever.

Seems there's more issues with the routine that just my recovery times, so I'll mix it up and try some new things, I'm old enough now that if I go a bit backwards in numbers for a bit that's fine with me.

I train at home too mate.

Here is what I have.

1 x shitty "ol Rusty" power cage.

1 x budget olympic barbell

1 x shitty adjustble bench (this is really shitty and will be replaced with a simple flat bench soon)

Lots x weight plates of varying sizes.

all sits outside under the patio.

All get used and abused nightly.

If there is an exercise that I can do on there, it's not worth doing.

No dumbbells, no cables, no bros.

That routine that Brids pasted is one that Markos put together as a "beginners program" some years back.

nothing magical about it. MATE where is this?? hehe.

What approach are people taking to deloading in terms of frequency.

I always get sucked into thinking one more session then I'll take a break but it never happens.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Input shaft bearing. They all do it. There is always rollover noise in Nissan boxes - particularly the big box. Don't worry about it unless it gets really growly.
    • For once a good news  It needed to be adjusted by that one nut and it is ok  At least something was easy But thank you very much for help. But a small issue is now(gearbox) that when the car is stationary you can hear "clinking" from gearbox so some of the bearing is 100% not that happy... It goes away once you push clutch so it is 100% gearbox. Just if you know...what that bearing could be? It sounding like "spun bearing" but it is louder.
    • Yeah, that's fine**. But the numbers you came up with are just wrong. Try it for yourself. Put in any voltage from the possible range and see what result you get. You get nonsense. ** When I say "fine", I mean, it's still shit. The very simple linear formula (slope & intercept) is shit for a sensor with a non-linear response. This is the curve, from your data above. Look at the CURVE! It's only really linear between about 30 and 90 °C. And if you used only that range to define a curve, it would be great. But you would go more and more wrong as you went to higher temps. And that is why the slope & intercept found when you use 50 and 150 as the end points is so bad halfway between those points. The real curve is a long way below the linear curve which just zips straight between the end points, like this one. You could probably use the same slope and a lower intercept, to move that straight line down, and spread the error out. But you would 5-10°C off in a lot of places. You'd need to say what temperature range you really wanted to be most right - say, 100 to 130, and plop the line closest to teh real curve in that region, which would make it quite wrong down at the lower temperatures. Let me just say that HPTuners are not being realistic in only allowing for a simple linear curve. 
    • I feel I should re-iterate. The above picture is the only option available in the software and the blurb from HP Tuners I quoted earlier is the only way to add data to it and that's the description they offer as to how to figure it out. The only fields available is the blank box after (Input/ ) and the box right before = Output. Those are the only numbers that can be entered.
    • No, your formula is arse backwards. Mine is totally different to yours, and is the one I said was bang on at 50 and 150. I'll put your data into Excel (actually it already is, chart it and fit a linear fit to it, aiming to make it evenly wrong across the whole span. But not now. Other things to do first.
×
×
  • Create New...