Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey all, I am in the process of putting an RB25DET Neo into my R32 gts-t and i just have a few questions about which parts i should be using.


First off this will be my daily (but i will only be driving it 2-3 times a week), but i will be taking it to as many track/drift days as i can, at which i will most probably drive it very hard haha. I am looking for reliability more than a maximum power figure at the moment, but anywhere between 240-270kw i will be happy with as long as it is a very safe tune. In saying that i would like to purchase parts that give me the ability to push 300-330+kw if i change the turbo/manifold set up later on.


I have broswed the forums for ages and have put together a list of what i think should keep me happy, but i would love some feedback/second opinions.


RB25DET NEO

Hypergear Hi-Flow (probably looking at the SS2PU or ATR43G2.5 or G3)

JJR Bellmouth 3" Dump pipe

Full 3" exhaust

Z32 AFM

Splitfire coilpacks

Pod filter

R32 GTR FMIC


Supporting Mods:

NEO NIStune ECU

Greddy Profec B spec 2 EBC

New Nissan thermostat

Full gasket kit (minus headgasket)

Replace under plenum water hoses


My questions are about Injectors and fuel pump.

I am tossing up between Siemens DEKA 630cc, or DeatschWerks 850cc. A few people on the forums use the Siemens, but i was wondering if they would give me enough head room to push 330kw+

Both are direct fit, just after people opinions/reasons why i should choose one over the other. Also would the DeatschWerks be large enough to support E85 if i eventually wet down that path?


Also which fuel pump should i fit. The two that i have chosen are the Walbro GSS-341 (255l/ph) or the newer Walbro 400l/ph E85 compatible pump. After a lot of reading most people seem to agree that neither of these pumps have fuel pickup issues in an R32 gts-t fuel tank.


Also one other question, what engine mounts should i use when putting the NEO in the 32? The normal RB20DET ones or do i use NEO ones?


Thanks!
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/421188-parts-for-a-250kw-neo/
Share on other sites

Yup, return flow kit from JJR will do the job. I second the call for Bosch 1000cc injectors (which you can buy in various ways, but the most popular appears to be injectordynamics).

Do not waste your time with a pod filter. Just make sure you have a good cold air feed to the R32 airbox.

Engine mounts......do you mean the steel or the rubber? Rubber, buy standard VL Commodore/R31 from generic parts or the stiffer Nismo ones. The steel bits are best done with the R32 units.

Take the opportunity to pull all the plumbing and other crap from the HICAS system out of the engine bay and from the rear of the car. The Neo PS pump won't run the HICAS system anyway, and you wouldn't want to be retro fitting old crap like the R32 pump onto the Neo.

You will also need to do some adaptation between the R32 and Neo heater hoses. They are different sizes.

Add a timing belt to your list.

cheers

Are these the ones that you mean? They seem to be the full length ones, I thought NEO's use the 3/4 length injectors?

http://www.t1racedevelopment.com/index.php/en/products/details/1149/153/injector-dynamics/id1000/nissan/injector-dynamics-1000cc-injectors--r32,-r33,-r34-skyline-14mm.html

I was already running an R32 GTR cooler and pod filter so that's sorted. Yeah I'm planning on ripping as much of the Hicas out this weekend as possible, just going to follow one of the tutorials on here.

With the engine mounts I didn't realise they were 2 seperate pieces. So I will buy new VL rubber mounts, and use the 32 steel outer part.

And I'm looking to keep everything as standard as possible, so no external gate haha

If you're planning on going much over 250kw I'd steer clear of the JJR turnflow, particularly if you're doing SS2 or G3. I have one fitted now and it's a limitation in reaching 300kw, so I'm putting on a non-turnflow Greddy kit now.

Get a larger (min 76mm thick) core and make sure the fron bar air dam is giving most of the core plenty of fresh air (not obscured by most of the stock front bar or number plate).

I have 256@wheels with very little done. Head ported stage 1 pomi tom cams 550cc injectors std manifolds neo op6 turbo with hypergear hiflow .63 rear now 3" turbo back 100 cel cat straight through muf and a 600 x 300 x 76 front mount. had chip fitted by EFI at Yatla on Brisbane south side running 12 psi boost and will be going back to get it reset for 16-18psi and hopeing to push up to 280-290kw@ wheels.

Edited by lcxu105

Looks like my parts should get me in the ballpark of 260kw then.

Having a read on the forums everyone seems to love the ID1000's, but with the link i posted they don't have the 3/4 length (48mm) option listed? Is there a direct fit ID1000 available for the NEO engine or will i have to use the 60mm ones and modify something else on the fuel rail or connectors? (Sorry, i have never playued around with injecotrs before and there seems to be limited direct fit NEO options)

http://www.t1racedevelopment.com/index.php/en/products/details/1149/153/injector-dynamics/id1000/nissan/injector-dynamics-1000cc-injectors--r32,-r33,-r34-skyline-14mm.html

Thinking a bit more about the build and was just wondering how beneficial cam gears are on the NEO. I know that RB25's have variable cam timing on the inlet cam so would i leave the stock cam gear and just use a variable gear on the exhaust cam?

Thanks.

Looks like my parts should get me in the ballpark of 260kw then.

Having a read on the forums everyone seems to love the ID1000's, but with the link i posted they don't have the 3/4 length (48mm) option listed? Is there a direct fit ID1000 available for the NEO engine or will i have to use the 60mm ones and modify something else on the fuel rail or connectors? (Sorry, i have never playued around with injecotrs before and there seems to be limited direct fit NEO options)

http://www.t1racedevelopment.com/index.php/en/products/details/1149/153/injector-dynamics/id1000/nissan/injector-dynamics-1000cc-injectors--r32,-r33,-r34-skyline-14mm.html

Thinking a bit more about the build and was just wondering how beneficial cam gears are on the NEO. I know that RB25's have variable cam timing on the inlet cam so would i leave the stock cam gear and just use a variable gear on the exhaust cam?

Thanks.

You want the 1000.48.14 model ID1000's for the Neo. They drop straight in, 48mm long and 14mm on both ends.

Thanks mate they were on the main page, not in the Nissan section. I want the plugs and clips option yeah?

About the cam gear, if I can pick up an exhaust cam gear for cheap still not worth it? I'd like to have response as close to stock as possible and thought a cam gear may aid this.

See, "don't bother with cam gears"

There are no results on SAU that I am aware of where cam gears did anything positive on a neo RB25. By the time you install your "cheap" cam gear, try to dial it in on the dyno and end up back at zero you will be wishing you saved your money on the "cheap" cam gear.

  • 2 weeks later...

Talking to Matt @ NIStune about my ECU and injectors. He was saying that 1000cc injectors would be overkill and that the engine wouldn't idle and would be very hard to tune. I said that I was planning on using Injector Dynamics 1000's and that lots of people had reported no idle problems with them, and some people (Piggaz etc) said even the 2000's are fine at idle.

Just wanting to see if anybody is running ID1000's on an RB25 with a NIStune before I change my injector choice.

Thanks all.

He admitted he hadn't worked with any Injector Dynamics injectors before, and he worked with a customers car the other day that was using 1000cc injectors and had massive idle problems.

They will be fine, they have been proven time and time again to idle and tune pretty much better than anything else, smaller injectors included.

To answer your other question further up, yep get the plugs and pins option rather than pigtail connections. That way you can just remove your old plugs and reconnect the USCAR ones to the existing wiring.

  • 1 month later...

Starting to put this thing back together now and i was trying to decide how to best set up the breathers from the cam covers. I have a normal greddy catch can with 2 fittings on it. Is my best bet just going to be to leave the PCV valve in place, and running the exhaust cam cover to one fitting of the catch can, and then the other out of the catch can into the intake before the turbo? Thanks.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • If as it's stalling, the fuel pressure rises, it's saying there's less vacuum in the intake manifold. This is pretty typical of an engine that is slowing down.   While typically is agree it sounds fuel related, it really sounds fuel/air mixture related. Since the whole system has been refurbished, including injectors, pump, etc, it's likely we've altered how well the system is delivering fuel. If someone before you has messed with the IACV because it needed fiddling with as the fuel system was dieing out, we need to readjust it back. Getting things back to factory spec everywhere, is what's going to help the entire system. So if it idles at 400rpm with no IACV, that needs raising. Getting factory air flow back to normal will help us get everything back in spec, and likely help chase down any other issues. Back on IACV, if the base idle (no IACV plugged in) is too far out, it's a lot harder for the ECU to control idle. The IACV duty cycle causes non linear variations in reality. When I've tuned the idle valves in the past, you need to keep it in a relatively narrow window on aftermarket ecus to stop them doing wild dances. It also means if your base idle is too low, the valve needs to open too much, and then the smallest % change ends up being a huge variation.
    • I guess one thing that might be wrong is the manifold pressure.  It is a constant -5.9 and never moves even under 100% throttle and load.  I would expect it to atleast go to 0 correct?  It's doing this with the OEM MAP as well as the ECU vacuum sensor. When trying to tune the base map under load the crosshairs only climb vertically with RPM, but always in the -5.9 column.
    • AHHHH gotchaa, I'll do that once I am home again. I tried doing the harness with the multimeter but it seems the car needed a jump, there was no power when it was in the "ON" position. Not sure if I should use car battery jump starter or if its because the stuff that has been disconnect the car just does send power.
    • As far as I can tell I have everything properly set in the Haltech software for engine size, injector data, all sensors seem to be reporting proper numbers.  If I change any injector details it doesnt run right.    Changing the base map is having the biggest change in response, im not sure how people are saying it doesnt really matter.  I'm guessing under normal conditions the ECU is able to self adjust and keep everything smooth.   Right now my best performance is happening by lowering the base map just enough to where the ECU us doing short term cut of about 45% to reach the target Lambda of 14.7.  That way when I start putting load on it still has high enough fuel map to not be so lean.  After 2500 rpm I raised the base map to what would be really rich at no load, but still helps with the lean spots on load.  I figure I don't have much reason to be above 2500rpm with no load.  When watching other videos it seems their target is reached much faster than mine.  Mine takes forever to adjust and reach the target. My next few days will be spent making sure timing is good, it was running fine before doing the ECU and DBW swap, but want to verify.  I'll also probably swap in the new injectors I bought as well as a walbro 255 pump.  
    • It would be different if the sealant hadn't started to peel up with gaps in the glue about ~6cm and bigger in some areas. I would much prefer not having to do the work take them off the car . However, the filler the owner put in the roof rack mount cavities has shrunk and begun to crack on the rail delete panels. I cant trust that to hold off moisture ingress especially where I live. Not only that but I have faded paint on as well as on either side of these panels, so they would need to come off to give the roofline a proper respray. My goal is to get in there and put a healthy amount of epoxy instead of panel filler/bog and potentially skin with carbon fiber. I have 2 spare rolls from an old motorcycle fairing project from a few years back and I think it'd be a nice touch on a black stag.  I've seen some threads where people replace their roof rack delete with a welded in sheet metal part. But has anyone re-worked the roof rails themselves? It seems like there is a lot of volume there to add in some threads and maybe a keyway for a quick(er) release roof rack system. Not afraid to mill something out if I have to. It would be cool to have a cross bar only setup. That way I can keep the sleek roofline that would accept a couple bolts to gain back that extra utility  3D print some snazzy covers to hide the threaded section to be thorough and keep things covered when not using the rack. 
×
×
  • Create New...