Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Alright, I've figured it out. 3 gates -_-

I'm assuming 1 per side of the stock manifold and another gate off the turbo housing as well? haha

imagine the noise :wub:

that's horrible for flow, why not just weld a gate flange off the rear housing?

I can't figure out who to goto to get a wastegate welded on... I'd personally prefer it welded on the manifold.

I can't figure out who to goto to get a wastegate welded on... I'd personally prefer it welded on the manifold.

Don't bother sending a manifold to me, I can't die grind the opening to the gate from the inside, and if I can't do a job properly, I won't do it at all. These 90 degree entry gate pipes welded in a hole... you are better off staying internal gate imo.

The housing on the other hand has great access. I can clean up the gate entry in no time.

Scotty do the GT Ni Resist housings weld ok ?

Also I was looking at Turbosmart 40 and 45mm external gates just to get an idea of their dimensions . What size external gates are being used on say typical RB25 GT30 setups in the 3-400 wheel wasp area .

I wish I could find the pic of a Turbosmart gate on the housing in a Skyline bay because it didn't stand out that much . I suppose real stealth would be having the gate closer to where the exhaust returns to the front pipe .

A .

It is quite hard to hide the gate, as there is no room to weld the gate underneath the turbo. You could mount it down where the dump is, but the pipe leading to the gate will be a little longer than I would like. (Plus it would need to be welded onsite)

The GT cast iron housings are very hard to cut and diegrind, but they weld fine. Stao's housings cut like butter and take half the time.

I would use 45mm for the gate, or perhaps larger. The boost control would be fine with a 40mm, but power would be more restricted. The 45mm gates are the same size Vbands as the steampipe I use so they flow nicely.

  • 4 weeks later...
from my testings, running the same turbo externally gated on turbine housing with stock manifold made less power then the same turbo on aftermarket manifold internally gated, and even lesser against aftermarket manifold externally gated.

Turbine housing has been untouched all times, the manifold is restrictive. So scientific solution would be attaching the external gate to the manifold. But factory manifold is twin log, do them properly requires extra work and skills, (I'm in process of building one at moment) while external gate from turbine housing makes the job easier.

Hay did end up building your manifold ?

Interested in what you came up with !

  • 4 months later...

You can't do much with it, or you will force the pulses into the other side of the log. The divider needs to stay. I would even extend it a little, to just before the gate.

I found better results by making the flow path smoother. You can't really do this running the gate off the manifold as you can't die grind it after welding.

  • 2 weeks later...

Ok. Maybe I am spazzing out, but how late on the housing could the gate be welded on?

Now I know common sense says put it where everyone puts it, close to the inlet, but I don't want to!

I would like for ultimate stealth Ness to weld the gate pretty much at the end of the scroll, so it is directly under the turbo and hidden. (Using the stock manifold)

Is that too silly? The way I see it if the little internal gate flange can work pretty well, a less than ideal external gate would still work sort of good? I don't need to be able to run low boost

Whatcha reckon?

I reckon the further around you put it the more restrictive the whole thing will become.

Remember 2 things. There is a total amount of exhaust gas that has to flow and there are 2 holes that it needs to flow out of. If the wastegate opening is early in the flow path (ie, on the manifold, or near the inlet end of the turbine housing) then that gas that goes out the wastegate does not have to flow around the steadily decreasing area of the scroll. If you locate the wastegate a fair way around the scroll, then all the turbine gas plus all the wastegate gas have to flow that far, instead of just the turbine gas. The back pressure will climb for every extra little bit further around you put the gate.

I wouldn't do it.

I think the issue with that (I asked Mr Scotty for the same thing) was that there's actually no room to put one there?

I could very well be dreaming, but I'm sure from underneath I can easily see the whole turbine housing. Maybe there's more room in a rwd stagea. Or maybe I am retarded.

The way I see it there isn't an ideal point to mount it on the manifold and the throat of the turbine housing is the largest area downstream of the six passages merging . Even then the mount angle sometimes isn't ideal but if you want part of the gas stream to change direction its easier to do that where the passage is larger .

For the work involved go the turbine housing or use an aftermarket manifold if you want the gate/s on it .

A .

Theres heaps of room underneath and it isn't much harder than having it higher up, mine was on a low mount 6 boost and still was enough room.

post-70965-0-30390600-1407226166_thumb.jpg

There was no boost control issue, it did seem a bit laggy though, but not sure if it was just the twin scroll ATP housing or not.

Edited by AngryRB

Theres heaps of room underneath and it isn't much harder than having it higher up, mine was on a low mount 6 boost and still was enough room.

attachicon.gif20130508_123417 (640x480).jpg

There was no boost control issue, it did seem a bit laggy though, but not sure if it was just the twin scroll ATP housing or not.

Do you have a pic? The 6boost manifold positions the turbo different to stock doesn't it? Sort of like an hks cast one does?

Ummm. You realise that the external gate has exhaust gasses flowing through it and is welded to either the exhaust manifold or the rear turbo housing? They withstand an incredible amount of heat. You can even get water cooled gates.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I always wondered how you were supposed to buy a set of 24 buckets and somehow magically have every single one of them yield exactly the desired clearance. I would have thought you'd need to assemble a cam with either 12 "sample" or "example" buckets of known top thickness (or a single such sample/example 12 times over!!) measure clearances at every valve, and then do the usual math to work out what the actual "shimness" of each bucket needed to be, before buying the required buckets to make up he thicknesses that you didn't have on hand.
    • I now seem to be limited in power due to my rev limit/hydraulic lifters in my built RB25. I'm looking into converting over to Tomei solid lifters. Question for anyone that has done the conversion. I was always under the impression that when using the Tomei solid lifter conversion, you would also require new valves (Longer or shorter stems, I can't remember which).  I don't know where I got this idea, as so far I see no mention of this in any of the Tomei documentation. It just states I need the Tomei solid buckets, solid lifter cams and upgraded springs. As my head is already built, all I would need is another set of 1000$ Kelford cams, 500$ buckets and about 4H hours of my time installing and I'm off to the races!?!? There's no way it's that simple, I must be missing something? 
    • I couldn't agree more. I should have started from the get-go with a NEO or solid bucket conversion. I started looking into converting over to solid lifters yesterday. Now for some reason I was always under the impression that when using the Tomei solid lifter conversion, you would also require new valves (Longer or shorter stems, I can't remember which).  But I see no mention of this on any of the Tomei documentation. It just states that I need the Tomei solid buckets, solid lifter cams and upgraded springs. As my head is already built, all I would need is another set of 1000$ Kelford cams, 500$ buckets and about 4H hours of my time installing and I'm off to the races!?!? There's no way it's that simple, I must be missing something? 
    • BRUH, one of the biggest mistakes of my life..... and i've had plenty ;[)
    • @Murray_Calavera iam just considering options 🙂 of course it is very expensive so that why i ask here 🙂  @joshuaho96 I looked at that GCG hybrid(i remember looking at it few weeks before) So this is "that" hybrid where i send them my turbo and they upgrade the inside to Garrett stuff and then they send it back. It cost around 1200-1300 USD which is FAR cheaper than the HKS and it is what iam looking for(i just do not have experience like this...to send something off to "upgrade" ) @tylink720 that is like 150 USD turbo no? 😄 I dont think i have the "ease on my mind" with this kind of turbo. I just put over 7000k USD to "LINK" up my engine...dont want to blow it up with cheap turbo 😄     EDIT: https://www.cj-motor.com/gcg-turbo-charger-for-nissan-rb20det-rb25det-high?srsltid=AfmBOooVeOZ6CZ6r1AIv5m-KPaa6BvudIPJTY8LW78khkd-gQlsaCht9 I looked at this and it seems ok? It is that CGC hybrid and it costs around 1250 USD (with back shipping). Do any of you have experience with this hybrid on NEO turbo? I quickly look thru the forum/web and it seems very good.
×
×
  • Create New...