Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

i agree, its a game, good one too, any one else having fun with it? i am,,, or does everyone have sand in vaginas atm?

no sandy vag here, loving it.

Just built an ElCamino. dead stock 2 speed powerglide and almost 800hp of supercharged burnout machine. lasts about 2 seconds before I plow it into a wall :)

Having fun, though some of the supercars like the 458 and Aventador handle like crap.

Ive only bought old supers so far (Diablo GT is fun) so I expect that from them. the veyron is a large heavy tire squealing lump of dead weight. but still fun

add me on psn :) qik33

Done, I've been chasing your Liscence times. do you play controller or wheel?

the huayra is fun without being too twitchy.the Mattehorn challenge is good fun
Yeah it's good fun. Can have done massive loses if you push too hard though, lol.
no sandy vag here, loving it.Just built an ElCamino. dead stock 2 speed powerglide and almost 800hp of supercharged burnout machine. lasts about 2 seconds before I plow it into a wall :) Ive only bought old supers so far (Diablo GT is fun) so I expect that from them. the veyron is a large heavy tire squealing lump of dead weight. but still fun Done, I've been chasing your Liscence times. do you play controller or wheel?
Mad-082 is my username (i think). I need some more licence times to chase, lol. my times are controller

Oh ok, lol. I forget who is who of people I've got added.

same man, but yours is easy enough to remember.

Alot of times between my friends arent showing up unfortunately.

Mount Panorama + Skylines = :yes:

So true. the mountain in general is great.

Nearly finished this 100%, quite easy really, even the super license and races are not that hard. Even though in super races it rains, you don't even have to change tires, every race I just ran hard slicks the whole time.

I'm still loving the game. Getting jack of all the mandatory updates though every time I switch the damn thing on!! I have reasonably good internet speeds, but over an hour to d/l a 1.2gb update is just ridiculous!! I turn the game on because I want to play it NOW, not in an hour... Gah... 1st world problems, I know, I know...

I'm still loving the game. Getting jack of all the mandatory updates though every time I switch the damn thing on!! I have reasonably good internet speeds, but over an hour to d/l a 1.2gb update is just ridiculous!! I turn the game on because I want to play it NOW, not in an hour... Gah... 1st world problems, I know, I know...

You could always sign out of psn before loading the game and see if that stops it. Or turn off the network settings to stop it connecting to the internet and checking for updates.

But the updates don't bother me too much. Only took about 20 mins for that 1.2gb update for me.

65% thru so far. having lots of fun on the side with fast cars instead of smashing though to the end.

Z06 Corvette has ruined the game

the new one?

I'm still loving the game. Getting jack of all the mandatory updates though every time I switch the damn thing on!! I have reasonably good internet speeds, but over an hour to d/l a 1.2gb update is just ridiculous!! I turn the game on because I want to play it NOW, not in an hour... Gah... 1st world problems, I know, I know...

as far as I know there was only 1 of this size, there have been several tiny ones but they only take a second.

there's been two 1.2GB updates. The "Day1 patch" and either 1.01 or 1.02 was 1.2Gb as well - can't remember which.

I'm still playing it occasionally, but think it's a fair step backwards from GT5. Less features, worse menu system - the most obvious example is you used to be able to veiw cars in your Garage and get to their settings by simply clicking on them. Now to do the same you have to click on them, then change into that car, then click O three times. Nice one... i would have much prefered the handful of new cars and tracks to just be DLC's for GT5, but that wouldn't have generated any hype and probably wouldn't have got anything like the amout of sales as they did by releasing it at GT6.

I'm with Warps. GT6 can stop trying to call itself a simulation. If you put racing slicks and a brake upgrade on a fiat, it will not do forward somersaults in downhill braking areas (eg at Bathurst Forest Elbow). Also, if you put slicks on a porsche it will not go into a slow motion roll over if you touch a ripple strip at high speed. "Simulation" my arse. GT6, your new physics model is a POS!

I was thinking about this yesterday (while playing gt6). If gt6 was a true simulator, when racing at a track with long straights in a stock skyline, you'd have a sudden loss of power and a message would come up saying that your turbo just spat it's exhaust wheel. Our when racing a gtr you'd have oil starvation issues, or when driving a Silvia and sitting on the start grid bouncing on the limiter before taking off, you'd have a rocker arm let go, lol. Or as your skyline got older you'd have to replace your coils to get rid of a misfire, lol.

I was thinking about this yesterday (while playing gt6). If gt6 was a true simulator, when racing at a track with long straights in a stock skyline, you'd have a sudden loss of power and a message would come up saying that your turbo just spat it's exhaust wheel. Our when racing a gtr you'd have oil starvation issues, or when driving a Silvia and sitting on the start grid bouncing on the limiter before taking off, you'd have a rocker arm let go, lol. Or as your skyline got older you'd have to replace your coils to get rid of a misfire, lol.

Lol. Not to mention when you miss a braking marker and T-bone a Ferrari Dino at full noise, you wouldn't just idle back onto the track and get stuck back into racing.... You'd run and hide in another state under a different name.

Edited by Hornet2572

i did just ave an audi A6 brake at the top of matterhorn and end up on the 2 front wheels lol.

also the S1 quattro rally car is a magic little animal. so much fun.

turn off all aids put sports soft tires on (take off racing tires) and smash out materhorn. ....love

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...