Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I've heard sometimes the wastegate flapper on the housing sometimes need machining for higher boost.

Actually, the higher the boost you run, the less the wastegate needs to flow, generally. I would get the external gate, but it depends on what the police are like up your way.

I run the same turbo on e85 putting 350kw to the wheels through an awd auto. ;)

  • 4 weeks later...

To give this a bit of a nudge - here's a comparison of a car running a Precision PT6766 versus one running a FP Super99 HTZ on an EVO running 47psi, probably about 300-400rpm difference in lag and near 100whp more on the same boost level! The Super99 is NOT on full attack mode here, by the way - at this boost area the tuner/owner are happier doing the rest of the tuning on the track as you are probably on bought time with everything when pushing that hard.

Has run 8.8 @ 168mph so far with this turbo on a cold track with big traction issues, will be interesting to see how it goes next season with more seat time etc.

49e76474-7fc7-44c8-8aca-a58b05ad7ae1.jpg

  • 2 weeks later...

I believe Mick_O is waiting on an order from FP direct, and it has been a long while.

Perhaps the kung fu king ordered the turbo under a different name? (Bruce Lee? Just being cheeky, not teasing you) Or maybe there is an honest mistake between either side of the process.

Call him up and ask for proof it was ordered. That's not unreasonable. However others are DEFINITELY experiencing delays, DIRECT from FP. So their claim of 'ship within a week' is currently bollocks.

Not to say Mr Chan didn't first give you the wrong turbo, but I highly doubt he would be trying to commit any sort of crime and rob you. I, like MANY others, bought from CJ Motor before, they were fine.

Lastly, you should be thankful you didn't contribute to the thread you mentioned.. That guy was embarrassing himself like a white dude screaming "I HAVE RIGHTS", rightfully addressed in the first 2 replies. I would consider it embarrassing to side with that sort of argument.

So, call CJ and ask for proof they ordered your replacement, and don't be that high society white guy screaming for his rights. I'm pretty sure your request will be met with a reasonable response.

I have given him the benefit of the doubt. I asked him on the phone and emailed him three times to ask for proof of purchase from Forced Performance and to fwd me. He has not done this and won't even reply to me. His 4 weeks has now turned into nearly 4 months.

I also forgot to mention Mike, the manager of Forced Performance says the turbo is a HTA88 - they havent sold them or made them for two years now. My box was not sealed when I got it from Jacky Chan.

f8446_a_jackie-chan-meme.jpg

I hope you finally get some resolution soon :(

4 months is a long time! You should have mentioned that in the original message :)

I am sure it will be resolved for you, though. Just pursue the available avenues through fair trading/consumer affairs and play by the book. The system will be in your favour.

Yeah when i ordered direct from FP it was about a week from order to delivery.... I did see on FB they were having all sorts of issues with power outages and phones offline etc so i assume with that and Xmas there would be some delays expected?

I ordered my turbo on the 29th November and im still waiting, unfortunately my order was placed around thanks giving and now xmas,new year etc.

They had a big holiday sale on and I do believe they were smashed with orders so shouldn't be too far off hopefully! :yes:

FP Have just started selling their Super94 HTA and Super99 HTZ turbos with T4 twin scroll turbine housings, which personally (and I am sure plenty of others into their RBs :) ) is relevant to my interests.

I ordered my turbo on the 29th November and im still waiting, unfortunately my order was placed around thanks giving and now xmas,new year etc.

They had a big holiday sale on and I do believe they were smashed with orders so shouldn't be too far off hopefully! :yes:

Good luck, hope it come sometime this month - I am excited to hear how this goes and it's not even my car haha

Thanks Dan shes still couple of weeks away unfortunately :(

Definitely looking forward to some extra added HTA power though :D

This Longest ive EVER been on a stock turbo... Thank G.O.D for ethanol :)

Hopefully you get a chance to take her for another spin as you've sampled the before HTA results..

Edited by Mick_o

Thanks Dan shes still couple of weeks away unfortunately :(

Definitely looking forward to some extra added HTA power though :D

This Longest ive EVER been on a stock turbo... Thank G.O.D for ethanol :)

Hopefully you get a chance to take her for another spin as you've sampled the before HTA results..

I am looking forward to seeing/hearing this thing in action!

  • 3 weeks later...

Hi all, another FP convert here.

My new RB25/30DET (CP pistons, Argo rods, 9.3:1 comp, HKS 256/264 cams, head work, Supertech valvetrain etc) is close to completion and I have a FP GT3586R and FP 0.85 rear housing ready to go - well amost ready, awaiting ceramic coating of turbine housing and polishing of comp' housing.

The aim is to run approximately 30-35psi on E85. Hoping for at least mid 400kW at rears, possibly sneak close to 500kW.

Thoughts?

post-81-0-49333800-1392335869_thumb.jpg

post-81-0-28218200-1392335877_thumb.jpg

post-81-0-47558500-1392335882_thumb.jpg

  • Like 1

Awesome, sounds like a potent combo. First thoughts when you mention aiming for 30-35psi are they the turbo is a mismatch for the setup, it WILL choke your engine when you try and hold that boost - however if you are willing to push the setup that hard, and you have the technology to control boost well then I reckon embrace the match you have and bring it up to 35psi and bleed it back to the maybe mid 20s or so that the thing will probably end up being happier with in the high rpm. The KT3 housing will help flow a bit but I think the 35R hotside will be a choker on that kind of setup with that kind of airflow, and even the compressor will struggle and max out.

Now for the bright side, if your aim is 450-500kw...if everything is working right it will probably do that piece of piss (won't need to go over 30psi to do it), and if you end up going to a 30+psi dropping off type boost curve.... It will probably not look amazing in terms of building power up, but area under the curve would be crazy. Hope you have a strong transmission! :-D

Looking forward to seeing the results :-)

Out of interest, what kind of spec are you coming from?

Lith, thanks for your input mate, exactly the kind of info I was looking for!

I'm not 100% commited to running 30-35psi, it was more of a ball park boost level to give a rough idea. If the combo' achieves somewhere in the region of 450-500kW at the rears on say 28psi dropping to 24 for example I certainly won't complain.

Solid area under the curve is exactly what I want to see and is what I'm used to based on my old set-up (although quite a bit less top end power).

Estimated time of completion was mid Feb' but you know how these things blow out. I'll be sure to update when the time comes.

Nice - look forward to hearing how it comes out :) What was the old setup? Any dyno sheets for it or anything? Be interesting to see how it compares, as it looks like the car was no slouch already!

I'm looking forward to how it turns out too.

The old set up consisted of a built 25 (CPs, 8.4:1 - pre E85 era) running a Turbonetics T62-1/T3 .63 Stage 3 on a ETM manifold and Pro-gate 48. On about 22-23psi (top end) it produced the numbers in my sig'. post-81-13924324050854_thumb.jpgpost-81-1392432417858_thumb.jpgpost-81-13924324292374_thumb.jpg

should be a epic,do everything well combo Matt... :yes: , looking forward to seeing the results..

cheers

darren

G'day Darren. I caught up with Rob last week. Had a brief chat about cars and how he and you were going.

I sure hope so mate. A solid combo once everything is sorted will keep me happy for a while.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...