Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

FP have released their own 6466TZ which presumably would be the equivalent, and has been discussed hypothetically recently in this thread. Hard to try and crystal ball how they would compare tbh, there are no results out for them yet - I don't even know if anyone has got one yet so it'd probably folly to say anything other than they should be similar, give or take some flow and spool.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

Please share the result once done. I am throwing around ideas for a low budget race car.

yeh i will, personally id weld a 11mm T4 open spacer to a stock manifold if it was mine, the T3 housing will be the killer, Should run 9's in a manual

vl though once car and driver are up to spec. Just did 390rwkw with a t04Z/3540 1.06 T3 internal gate on 30psi and united 100 for reference, think

it went 10.4 @ 134mph(manual) with that, although area under the curve is dismal with that big comp wheel driving that turbine, laggy POS

hes gone E85 aswell now

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
  • Like 1

Bugger - that sucks :( I hope luck improves from here on in!

Ended up getting my money back on that motor and have Darren Lewis building me a complete 30/26 for me, my turbo has arrived but I wont be home for a couple of weeks but will get some pics up when I can

  • 2 weeks later...
Seems like these new HTA turbos are pretty exciting. Just after opinions on an HTA3076 on a twin cam RB30. In the past with the old garretts, the 3076 did not seem to have enough top end and tended to be out of puff high in the rev range. However these new HTAs seem to flow a bit more. Now in this situation I would be after great response but without running out of puff up top. So just deciding between the HTA3076 or HTA3582 and wondering how people think the HTA3076 would behave. Specs are as follows


RB25 neo head stock with tomei 260 cams (will install some better valve springs)

Running E85 - 1000cc injectors and 1000hp fuel pump

plazmaman plenum and throttle body

6 boost manifold, turbosmart pro gate

intercooler, exhaust etc etc

RB30 bottom end stock for now


I would be after anywhere from 350 to 400rwkw with good response for a street car. I am thinking if I keep the relatively low duration tomei 260 cams with VCT, E85 and the 3 litre bottom end, these three factors should really give me quite a responsive combo. I am thinking it would be super super responsive with an HTA3076 but am just a bit concerned about the top end. I would think the setup would still be relatively responsive even with the HTA3582.


So which would you go for in a fun street car?

I think the 3076 would be too small mate. The HTA3582 seems to spool very similar to a 3076 from all accounts so yes HTA 3582 would be AMAZING on a 3.0L I even think the 3586 would be damn nice on the street!

I would also be inclined to try FP's new .85 housing for nice flow up top on the 3.0L :D

Let us know which path you choose as your setup sounds nice!

I would totally go the HTA3582 on an RB30, I think it would be a weapon for a fun fast street car. HTA3076 is an awesome turbo and definitely flows more than a GT3076R, but bare in mind these also respond a fair bit better size for size.... the spool of an HTA3582 on a 30 would be awesome, even if you kept it under 400kw it would be a good balance but the headroom to hit or go over 400kw with ease will leave you in a good place imho.

Sent from my GT-I9505 using Tapatalk

I'm still loving the HTA3076 but agree the 3L would probably favour the 3582!!

I am glad i stuck with the 3076 as the power is great and the response is nice, on track i need to learn to get it up on boost quicker out of the corners as i was just using 3rd and 4th the whole day, blew a gearbox the day earlier so am trying to be nice to the new one lol....

I'm still loving the HTA3076 but agree the 3L would probably favour the 3582!!

I am glad i stuck with the 3076 as the power is great and the response is nice, on track i need to learn to get it up on boost quicker out of the corners as i was just using 3rd and 4th the whole day, blew a gearbox the day earlier so am trying to be nice to the new one lol....

Anti-lag?? :woot:

What do the HTA35's sound like, do any HTA's sound like a GT3076 or a HKS T51? Looks like the cost of a GT3076 has come up closer to a HTA now or maybe im looking in the wrong places.

Edited by AngryRB

What do the HTA35's sound like, do any HTA's sound like a GT3076 or a HKS T51? Looks like the cost of a GT3076 has come up closer to a HTA now or maybe im looking in the wrong places.

The HTA30 and 35s in the Garrett housings don't have epic antisurge whistle - there may be an ever slight background noise (maybe a bit like some GTX do) but nothing like the GT3076R. The HTA3794s sound pretty awesome, and I get the impression the Super94/99 may too - but that's a bit different hahaha. Can't wait to see what the 6466TZ performs and sounds like when someone finally posts results.

Interestingly, the FP 3.25" intake housing seem to whistle like hell - Mick_O's 73HTA sounds awesome!

LOL!! My car is the complete opposite. Reasonably very well behaved around town, deafening when the gate cracks.

I'm gonna need to sort my shit and go pay Mick a visit.

It's taken me a number of nights to read through this thread (thank you night shifts :) ) and I'm sold on the HTA's

The feedback and research that you guys have gone in to is awesome

I've seen Mat's car in action a number of times and the thing is a weapon.

After september I'll be taking the 34 off the road and starting my build. I'll be throwing in the 3076, was thinking a 3073 but FP doesn't seem to have it on their website anymore

Still unsure as to what rear housing and compressor housing to have though. Recommendations?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
    • You don't have an R34 service manual for the body do you? Have found plenty for the engine and drivetrain but nothing else
×
×
  • Create New...