Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Thought I'd ask in here because this is one thing that PCLink help files dont really give to much info on

Virtual Auxiliary Outputs

I can't get my head around these, Just trying to bring check engine light on under certain conditions (Temps etc) but from what I can find, the Aux 7 channel needs to be turned to a GP output. I'll copy and paste the advice from the link Forum here to save me explaining it:

1) In ECU settings set Virtual Aux 1 (or whichever virtual aux you wish to use) to CE light
2) In ECU settings set Aux 1 (or whichever aux your CE is connected to) to GP Output
3) Set Switch logic in Aux 1 to 'Cond 1 OR 2'
4) Set SW Cond 1 to Aux Virtual Value 1 = ON
5) Set Aux Virtual Value 1 = ON to 1 (or whichever virtual aux number you decided to use)
6) Set SW Cond 2 to Knock > Value1
7) Set Knock > Value1 to whatever minimum knock level you want the check engine light to come on at.

So is this basically using the Aux 7 output to do what you want (In this case warn of knock) and switch condition 1 is just a roundabout way of setting AUX 7 as a Virtual CEL (which it actually is anyway)

So bascially, its like having Aux 7 setup as a CEL as normal (through SW condition 1 (Virtual AUX set as CEL)) but with an additional 1 or 2 options to turn the CEL on (SW condition 2 + 3)

Have I got this right? Or am I way off.... lol

  • 3 months later...

Yep pyrometer not a bad idea .

Changed to straight United E85 at the bottom of the last fuel price cycle because the next tune will be on this fuel . I paid 1.30.9L and at the same time 7Eleven P98 went up to 179.9L - screw that .

When I change fuels I drive it till it starts stumbling and throw 10L of the new whatever in , and do again to get the residual down to SFA . Then fill to the top .

In the 10L stages I tune for the new brew which starts with the master fuel trim - from -12 to +5 in this case . My car was originally tuned on E70 nearly two years ago so master set a 0 isn't too far from what E85 is . It just needed a fiddle with accel settings and cold start stuff .

I have a feeling that the consumption is going to be better than I thought it would be possibly because my tuning is better than it used to be - or I stumbled upon better settings .

I don't often make changes to my timing table but the corrections get moved around a little .

My current challenge is to get up around 375 out of a tank of E85 because that's three quarters of my best efforts on E42 - 500+ km .

Tuning with E85 is a pleasure because its such a forgiving fuel , it can be a fair way out and still run with a few hick ups .

To be fair my SF740s cope better on E85 because the low down pulse widths are wider and that helps keep things a bit more accurate .Once the EV14s go in it should get better again and with enough pump the target 300 wheel wasps should be easy to achieve .

I'm lucky that I can buy E85 close to work and stash a bit so I don't run out . I would like to see more servos in southern Sydney selling E85 because my next closest is Minto .

Cheers A .

The new Vipec plugin for 350z has just been released, I may be heading this way in the future with some serious modifications to the engine loom on the VQ25det... Some impressive features on this.

post-63525-0-66051500-1405466282_thumb.jpg

We need Guilt Toy back in Oz !

Cheers A .

yeah i am back mate... just been struggling with some health issues... good news is that i have got my own shop and dyno now, just as a hobby shop to help out my friends and people who need a facility that they can come down and have a play with their cars without the angry dyno shop's breathing down their throats counting the seconds for the dyno hire / tune time.

I plan to open a proper high performance shop once i recovery properly.

send me a PM if you want to come up and have some Guilt-Toy loving.

you should keep tabs on my facebook, ive been back since october last year.

www.facebook.com/tunedbyanthony

send me a PM if you need a tune guys.

post-1240-0-44995500-1405483541_thumb.jpg

Wow that sounds really good of you ^^

Hope people appreciate that gesture. I know I'd be happy if someone local to me was willing to show some freedom with their dyno.

Happy to see people still doing it for the love :) hope you get back up 100% soon

The new Vipec plugin for 350z has just been released, I may be heading this way in the future with some serious modifications to the engine loom on the VQ25det... Some impressive features on this.

yeah we manually wired in a Vipec V88 into a 2004 model 350z, i setup the ethrottle and the vvt.

it worked great! a plugin would be even easier.

Injector Dynamics short EV14 850s . They are intended to be an alternative for later Chev alloy V8s amongst other things . I wanted something in between 740 and 1000 and since Anthony ran his 740 side feeds out at I think 360 RWKW on his RB30 I figured 850s should be fine .

Anthony it would be great to get up to Newie and talk tuning , I'm interested to know if it's still possible to get an RB2530 past the emissions test to make it legal and insurable .

I don't do social networking like facebook or twitter but other members of my family do . I have a bit of time ATM if your health is up to a run on the rollers .

Will PM soon cheers Adrian .

I started using it about a week ago in small amounts to get the old 50 50 mix out . When filled the first half tank only got me 170 kays but that included a bit of road tuning .

Have two dramas ATM , the Tech Edge is playing up and I'm not sure if its the box the probe or a power supply issue . Taking the box and probe down to them next week and if the box tests ok I'll get another LSU 4.9 probe and they can calibrate the box for it .

Stone cold starting is difficult ATM but once it fires it seems ok . I've imported the original tunes warm up map after mucking around with mine and It'll get another cold start this evening .

I probably need to get one of my Maxima alternators in so there's a bit higher output to cover everything . The original Mitsubishi has 140+ on it and is probably tired .

I was going to see where you were up to next week if the TE gear checks out ok , a plug change would be good too .

Cheers A .

It winds over ok but it takes a little longer to fire than I'd like . I don't remember it being like this on E70 .

It may need a bit more cold cranking timing to light up a slower burning fuel like 85% ethanol .

A .

Found a couple of typo silly mistakes in crank enrichment and time out going back a couple of revisions so fixing this should be straightforward .

Basically not enough crank enrichment for too long , decimal point one step wrong way on timeout .

A .

I use a neat little feature called "add dwell on crank" it aids with starting as the voltage drops however if your injector dwell tables are correct vs. Voltage then you would not need to use that feature at all

  • 2 months later...

Hey guys,

Is there a good way to take my base map in Datalogit and dump it into the Vipec Fuel Table? I don't understand how the fuel calculation in Vipec works.

Thanks

Off the top of my head, loosely - some algebra (ignoring any extra trims)

m = Master fuel (ms)

p = Pressure (MGP in kPa)

a = Target AFR

t = Fuel table value

i = Injector pulsewidth

If Open Loop AFR is off...

i = m x ((t/100) x ((p+100)/100))

If Open Loop AFR is on...

i = m x ((t/100) x ((p+100)/100)) x (14.7/a)

I think that's more or less right, just kinda brain spewed but should give the general idea.

Anyone here played around with closed loop boost control on Vipec?

Mine has always been set to open loop but I'm finding that when running higher boost (2bar) the boost holds well in higher gears but in 1st and 2nd I'm getting a lot less (1.5-1.7bar). I know I can run boost trims in each gear but rather than messing around and setting that up is it just easier to run closed loop?

Strictly speaking I'm not sure if you really should need closed loop - I guess I don't know how tricky your setup is, but I would have thought open loop should be sufficient with a good external gate setup to hold a pretty consistent boost level, unless it's actually just physically difficult to build that much boost in the lower gears with your setup and it's more a lag thing than a boost control one?

Either way, I've never used it - even with internal wastegates if you don't have any tricky stuff you are trying to achieve the open loop setup is pretty good. I think (/thought?) the gear trim thing was more to reduce or increase boost for each gear as opposed to aid it in reaching the target boost. .3+bar sounds to me more than what I'd have thought was the intention behind closed loop boost control, I figured it as just being there to tidy up slight deviations from the target.... getting near half a bar is like a whole different target though I could be off point here.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...