Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I am planning a 2530 into my S2 RS stagea (rwd, neo)

Now heres my dilemma. It is my daily, so need to be able to do an engine swap in a weekend, so cant pull down my engine to do it.

I have bought an RB30 and a non neo RB25de to use the head.

The plan is to put the neo inlet manifold onto the head, due to injectors, sensors etc.
The thing is I know the neo exhaust valves are bigger, so how much would using a non neo head hurt the power?

I am not after huge power, currently making 285 with a GT3071 and will be using the same turbo. Looking at improving drive-ability and torque.

I have searched like mad but cant find an answer.
So has anyone put a non neo rb2530 into a car that had a neo, and what was the outcome?

Thanks

Ben

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426681-neo-head-or-not/
Share on other sites

Thanks. it is an r33 head.

The issue with using my head is the time it is going to take to have to weld up oil feed and run external line.

I have a Nistune and am running ls2 coils so ignition wise no problem.

I am leaning towards using my head, will just need to wait a while as a result.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426681-neo-head-or-not/#findComment-6888231
Share on other sites

Neo head is far better...you'd be silly to go backwards..

what about 25/30 height difference, i thought(maybe wrongly,i havn't done it) that you have problems with manifolds

due to extra height? can you use standard inlet and ex manifold?

where did you dyno your car?

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426681-neo-head-or-not/#findComment-6889429
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, thats what I thought!

And no joke about no matter what it wont be ready in a weekend, I was deluding myself for a bit there.

Just wondering if anyone knew from experience, but I suppose people dont normally try a backwards step to see how bad it is!

Edited by superben
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426681-neo-head-or-not/#findComment-6889432
Share on other sites

Neo head is far better...you'd be silly to go backwards..

what about 25/30 height difference, i thought(maybe wrongly,i havn't done it) that you have problems with manifolds

due to extra height? can you use standard inlet and ex manifold?

where did you dyno your car?

cheers

darren

Hi,

I have roughly checked the height issue, and it seems all good. Was planning on triple checking soon, there is always the option of dropping the engine a little to gain more clearance if needed.

Car was Dyno'd at Garage 7, plus I bought the nistune individual licence and already had a wideband data logger.,

Tuning seems pretty good, at cruise and WOT, but there are some heaps rich spots around 3/4 throttle to tweak. Its the VE map thats doing it.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426681-neo-head-or-not/#findComment-6889813
Share on other sites

If someone can show me a NEO head out perform a non NEO head for power and response on the same motor ill eat my shirt.

The only advantage I see with a NEO head is the ability to use bigger cams while retaining VCT, all other differences would be hard pressed to see a change on a dyno.

Use what you have and save your $$$.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426681-neo-head-or-not/#findComment-6890436
Share on other sites

What are you showing me exactly?

Spend a few grand on any head and it will out flow a stocker.

What I am saying is by bolting on a NEO head over a non Neo head you are not going to see something magical happen power and response wise.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426681-neo-head-or-not/#findComment-6890451
Share on other sites

that's just like saying leave the single cam head on, because with double cam u won't c improvements in power and response

Everyone knows if u can retain VCT, it significantly improves bottom end response and torque

but since he has the non neo head already then it will still get the job done

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426681-neo-head-or-not/#findComment-6890462
Share on other sites

that's just like saying leave the single cam head on, because with double cam u won't c improvements in power and response

Everyone knows if u can retain VCT, it significantly improves bottom end response and torque

but since he has the non neo head already then it will still get the job done

You are comparing two TOTALLY different heads there mate.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426681-neo-head-or-not/#findComment-6890465
Share on other sites

If someone can show me a NEO head out perform a non NEO head for power and response on the same motor ill eat my shirt.

The only advantage I see with a NEO head is the ability to use bigger cams while retaining VCT, all other differences would be hard pressed to see a change on a dyno.

Use what you have and save your $$$.

youd be safe as you know its not going to happen..lol, i bet on a 150mph car there would be,maybe not the small shit though

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/426681-neo-head-or-not/#findComment-6890699
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...