Jump to content
SAU Community

Neo Head Or Not?


Ben C34
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I am planning a 2530 into my S2 RS stagea (rwd, neo)

Now heres my dilemma. It is my daily, so need to be able to do an engine swap in a weekend, so cant pull down my engine to do it.

I have bought an RB30 and a non neo RB25de to use the head.

The plan is to put the neo inlet manifold onto the head, due to injectors, sensors etc.
The thing is I know the neo exhaust valves are bigger, so how much would using a non neo head hurt the power?

I am not after huge power, currently making 285 with a GT3071 and will be using the same turbo. Looking at improving drive-ability and torque.

I have searched like mad but cant find an answer.
So has anyone put a non neo rb2530 into a car that had a neo, and what was the outcome?

Thanks

Ben

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks. it is an r33 head.

The issue with using my head is the time it is going to take to have to weld up oil feed and run external line.

I have a Nistune and am running ls2 coils so ignition wise no problem.

I am leaning towards using my head, will just need to wait a while as a result.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Use the Neo head - its is far superior. Whatever you do its is very likely that your car won't be ready for Monday so if you can't borrow a car plan to use some taxis or hire a cheap car for a week.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neo head is far better...you'd be silly to go backwards..

what about 25/30 height difference, i thought(maybe wrongly,i havn't done it) that you have problems with manifolds

due to extra height? can you use standard inlet and ex manifold?

where did you dyno your car?

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks guys, thats what I thought!

And no joke about no matter what it wont be ready in a weekend, I was deluding myself for a bit there.

Just wondering if anyone knew from experience, but I suppose people dont normally try a backwards step to see how bad it is!

Edited by superben
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Neo head is far better...you'd be silly to go backwards..

what about 25/30 height difference, i thought(maybe wrongly,i havn't done it) that you have problems with manifolds

due to extra height? can you use standard inlet and ex manifold?

where did you dyno your car?

cheers

darren

Hi,

I have roughly checked the height issue, and it seems all good. Was planning on triple checking soon, there is always the option of dropping the engine a little to gain more clearance if needed.

Car was Dyno'd at Garage 7, plus I bought the nistune individual licence and already had a wideband data logger.,

Tuning seems pretty good, at cruise and WOT, but there are some heaps rich spots around 3/4 throttle to tweak. Its the VE map thats doing it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone can show me a NEO head out perform a non NEO head for power and response on the same motor ill eat my shirt.

The only advantage I see with a NEO head is the ability to use bigger cams while retaining VCT, all other differences would be hard pressed to see a change on a dyno.

Use what you have and save your $$$.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What are you showing me exactly?

Spend a few grand on any head and it will out flow a stocker.

What I am saying is by bolting on a NEO head over a non Neo head you are not going to see something magical happen power and response wise.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's just like saying leave the single cam head on, because with double cam u won't c improvements in power and response

Everyone knows if u can retain VCT, it significantly improves bottom end response and torque

but since he has the non neo head already then it will still get the job done

Link to comment
Share on other sites

that's just like saying leave the single cam head on, because with double cam u won't c improvements in power and response

Everyone knows if u can retain VCT, it significantly improves bottom end response and torque

but since he has the non neo head already then it will still get the job done

You are comparing two TOTALLY different heads there mate.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If someone can show me a NEO head out perform a non NEO head for power and response on the same motor ill eat my shirt.

The only advantage I see with a NEO head is the ability to use bigger cams while retaining VCT, all other differences would be hard pressed to see a change on a dyno.

Use what you have and save your $$$.

youd be safe as you know its not going to happen..lol, i bet on a 150mph car there would be,maybe not the small shit though

cheers

darren

Edited by jet_r31
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share




  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • migrating/updating forums is a c@nt of a job, so I don't envy him lol!
    • Just commenting to attach Greg's picture in the forums. I'm surprised it's still available on imgur considering how long it has been. Free imagehosting like that gives me anxiety.  
    • Thanks for this, exactly what i needed to know   - sent from the future
    • Maybe Josh could and should look at that UniClutch thingo too. The street twin one would take the power he's talking about easily. Light action and no noise.
    • Man, clutch feel is so subjective. I moved to the Nismo Twin from a heavy single plate NPC Heavy Duty Organic and it is sooo much better to drive in everyday traffic. A heavy clutch pedal is the worst here. The Nismo is light enough I don't even think about it. But with the heavy clutch in traffic I was aware of every time I had to push the pedal. In terms of being grabby I would describe it like this: - A normal clutch has ~10cm of clutch pedal travel between initial bite point and clutch fully gripping - With the Nismo twin plate it's ~4cm of clutch pedal travel for the same From what I understand that's normal for multi-plate clutches. Maybe the Nismo is more forgiving than others, don't know. It's not punishing but you have to get used to it. My driving is 80% city and no issues there. Smooth to take off and change gears. Hill starts are mostly fine. It is a bit of a pain for reversing on an incline. I find it hard to get the right amount of clutch slip for that and always end up feeling like I'm burning it too much. But, you may have a very different experience based on your body type and footwear. With heavy boots or shoes it's likely going to be pretty shit. Just because the clutch is light and the boots don't give enough feel to let the clutch pedal out with precision. Might be similar if you are a big guy or have motor control issues. But able-bodied and driving with decent shoes it feels great. You don't mention noise at all. It does chatter at idle RPM when it gets warm. Nothing that is out of place in a GTR though IMO.
×
×
  • Create New...