Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi guys,

I been doing some research and I figured that i should get a front brace,

My car power and what its sitting on in breif---

Power (Conservative_330awkw)

Slight camber

18x10 On 265 tyres

..

But before i make my move, I just want to ask is there a real difference in $60-$100 (steel or Alloy) compare to $100-200 (steel or alloy)

I am thinking to myself what can a 200 brace do that a 70 brace cant.. i think this is just one of those things that cost more because of the brand ONLY..

Whats your thoughtss???.. I dont really have a clue about these type of things

Edited by GTRAAH

You just gotta like the look of it and it fits. Paying more or less is a furphy, in most instances.

You can get a 2nd hand named brand like Cusco for $100 or less.

-> Yes there is structural integrity, strength, design, adjustable etc to consider.

Edit.

I had a Cusco strut brace and it did the job. I liked the HKS Kansai which also does the job and looks great.

$100 v $550.

Edited by Sinista32

^^^ LOL :) I seriously recon if it doesn't brake then anything will do, its only to make it rigid.. I mean i read about what it does and seems like anything that will hold , will do the job

What do you think about this one?

http://justjap.com/store/product.php?productid=16630&cat=394&page=1

I like the look matched the colours and this shoulld be a perfect fit... And to top it off Awesome cheap for a brand new product

Edited by GTRAAH

Whats that LOL please show me pics or links :)

SHould I get rear strut brace aswell? If so where would it sit? Boot? Waste of room that is, my Sub is in there

Edited by GTRAAH

If Skylines had struts then they would need strut braces. But they do not have struts. The upper suspension arms are bolted to the chassis much lower down than the top of the suspension towers, and as such there is much less effect of teh movement of the tower tops on suspension angles.

Sure, adding a brace may stiffen the front of the car up a little bit, but the amount of benefit available from it is much much smaller than it is on a car with Mac struts.

Furthermore, strut braces that have pivoting joints at the ends and do not triangulate to the firewall are not really what you would call a quality engineering design. What you end up with is a parallelogram (actually, it's probably a trapezoid). The top is the brace, the bottom is the subframe and the sides are the strut towers. Any shape with 4 sides has very little resistance to deformation. Without a diagonal or two, you can easily push one side about relative to the opposite side. Sure, putting the brace in at least closes the square so that the top two corners have to move together, but they still move. Triangulation is the key to good stiffness, and strut braces generally DO NOT OFFER ANY.

PLUS....any bar that has bends near the ends so that it can clear up over the engine is going to need to be made out of something really stiff so that it doesn't just deform itself as the loads are put into its ends. As such, the little alloy round and oval cross section ones are probably toys compared to the big multi member and multichamber extruded ones.

I guess its preference why some ppl have them and some dont. Must do something positive the the N1 come stock with them ....

http://www.ebay.com.au/itm/ULTRA-RACING-1-PIECE-STEEL-REAR-STRUT-TOWER-BAR-BRACE-89-91-NISSAN-SKYLINE-R32-/160983771496?pt=Motors_Car_Truck_Parts_Accessories&hash=item257b616968&_uhb=1

Heres an explanation I found easy to understand if you scroll down before/after Its not much but for track enthusiasts will help.. I would like to hear if people have really felt any difference with them in or out

Of course people feel difference with them. Even if there is no difference you will always "feel" a difference to provide you with a warm glow so you don't think you wasted your money.

I have no doubt that a lot of body wobble and so on is removed from running one. I just maintain that on a car where the position of the upper suspension mounts is not really affected by how much the top of the towers can wander around, there can be little real effect on the REAL handling of the car.

The situation would be doubly more so at the rear of the car, where all of the suspension is completely separate from the body, yet people still want to fit strut bars back there. And, yes, Nissan did also put them there. But I can bet you that they only did it because the market expected it. And if the body wobble is decreased, it does add to the feeling that it does something for the handling, even if it doesn't.

So, why exactly do you think you need a strut brace? Do you have the best / optimum springs? Do you have the best / optimum shock absorbers? Do you have the best / optimum anti-roll bars? Have you got the best / optimum weight balance / distribution on the chassis? Are you chasing the last 1000th of a second lap time on the race track?

A strut brace should be the very last thing you want / need to improve the handling of you car.

(That said, yes I have a strut brace fitted to my 32 GTS4. But I doubt I could tell the difference if I removed it)

i've bent those rectangle cusco style braces by hand before, cheap steel braces will work well long as its tubular/ braced.

my n*power brace works, i can tell the difference with out it ( ceffy ) although the bracket where the billet pipe bolts on has lil bit of flex

also dont see why every one thinks they need a brace just because they have more power then factory?

it stiffens up the front chassis for better cornering...

Edited by Dan_J

 

i've bent those rectangle cusco style braces by hand before, cheap steel braces will work well long as its tubular/ braced.

my n*power brace works, i can tell the difference with out it ( ceffy ) although the bracket where the billet pipe bolts on has lil bit of flex

also dont see why every one thinks they need a brace just because they have more power then factory?

it stiffens up the front chassis for better cornering...

 

Cefiro has struts, no? S chassis cars also have struts. Skylines do not.

ferfuxaske.

Paul, I have done already! :) Control arms are practically levelled out now , I had to raise it Because I have 18s X10 running :) But the car looks nice height still, its an illusion but because of the larger rims. Looks perfect!!

Anyways...ppl

I just thought its better for your car not to twist in places it shouldn't thats pretty much why i asked.. Its more for pretecting the chassis, every little bit helps id think... Its not like im going to spend thousands, its not expensive and even if $100 is going to do a tiny bit off difference I might aswell..

Afterall isn't it better for your chassis not to twist, even slightly ? So years in bit of twisting here and there couldn't be that good for the chassis.

Edited by GTRAAH

   

Cefiro has struts, no? S chassis cars also have struts. Skylines do not.

ferfuxaske.

i know this, thats why i stated ceffy not to confuse those although the front r32 uprights do bolt up to the strut tower walls so go figure.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • So, that is it! It is a pretty expensive process with the ATF costing 50-100 per 5 litres, and a mechanic will probably charge plenty because they don't want to do it. Still, considering how dirty my fluid was at 120,000klm I think it would be worth doing more like every 80,000 to keep the trans happy, they are very expensive to replace. The job is not that hard if you have the specialist tools so you can save a bit of money and do it yourself!
    • OK, onto filling. So I don't really have any pics, but will describe the process as best I can. The USDM workshop manual also covers it from TM-285 onwards. First, make sure the drain plug (17mm) is snug. Not too tight yet because it is coming off again. Note it does have a copper washer that you could replace or anneal (heat up with a blow torch) to seal nicely. Remove the fill plug, which has an inhex (I think it was 6mm but didn't check). Then, screw in the fill fitting, making sure it has a suitable o-ring (mine came without but I think it is meant to be supplied). It is important that you only screw it in hand tight. I didn't get a good pic of it, but the fill plug leads to a tube about 70mm long inside the transmission. This sets the factory level for fluid in the trans (above the join line for the pan!) and will take about 3l to fill. You then need to connect your fluid pump to the fitting via a hose, and pump in whatever amount of fluid you removed (maybe 3 litres, in my case 7 litres). If you put in more than 3l, it will spill out when you remove the fitting, so do quickly and with a drain pan underneath. Once you have pumped in the required amount of clean ATF, you start the engine and run it for 3 minutes to let the fluid circulate. Don't run it longer and if possible check the fluid temp is under 40oC (Ecutek shows Auto Trans Fluid temp now, or you could use an infrared temp gun on the bottom of the pan). The manual stresses the bit about fluid temperature because it expands when hot an might result in an underfil. So from here, the factory manual says to do the "spill and fill" again, and I did. That is, put an oil pan under the drain plug and undo it with a 17mm spanner, then watch your expensive fluid fall back out again, you should get about 3 litres.  Then, put the drain plug back in, pump 3 litres back in through the fill plug with the fitting and pump, disconnect the fill fitting and replace the fill plug, start the car and run for another 3 minutes (making sure the temp is still under 40oC). The manual then asks for a 3rd "spill and fill" just like above. I also did that and so had put 13l in by now.  This time they want you to keep the engine running and run the transmission through R and D (I hope the wheels are still off the ground!) for a while, and allow the trans temp to get to 40oC, then engine off. Finally, back under the car and undo the fill plug to let the overfill drain out; it will stop running when fluid is at the top of the levelling tube. According to the factory, that is job done! Post that, I reconnected the fill fitting and pumped in an extra 0.5l. AMS says 1.5l overfill is safe, but I started with less to see how it goes, I will add another 1.0 litres later if I'm still not happy with the hot shifts.
    • OK, so regardless of whether you did Step 1 - Spill Step 2 - Trans pan removal Step 3 - TCM removal we are on to the clean and refill. First, have a good look at the oil pan. While you might see dirty oil and some carbony build up (I did), what you don't want to see is any metal particles on the magnets, or sparkles in the oil (thankfully not). Give it all a good clean, particularly the magnets, and put the new gasket on if you have one (or, just cross your fingers) Replacement of the Valve body (if you removed it) is the "reverse of assembly". Thread the electrical socket back up through the trans case, hold the valve body up and put in the bolts you removed, with the correct lengths in the correct locations Torque for the bolts in 8Nm only so I hope you have that torque wrench handy (it feels really loose). Plug the output speed sensor back in and clip the wiring into the 2 clips, replace the spring clip on the TCM socket and plug it back into the car loom. For the pan, the workshop manual states the following order: Again, the torque is 8Nm only.
    • One other thing to mention from my car before we reassemble and refill. Per that earlier diagram,   There should be 2x B length (40mm) and 6x C length (54mm). So I had incorrectly removed one extra bolt, which I assume was 40mm, but even so I have 4x B and 5x C.  Either, the factory made an assembly error (very unlikely), or someone had been in there before me. I vote for the latter because the TCM part number doesn't match my build date, I suspect the TCM was changed under warranty. This indeed led to much unbolting, rebolting, checking, measuring and swearing under the car.... In the end I left out 1x B bolt and put in a 54mm M6 bolt I already had to make sure it was all correct
    • A couple of notes about the TCM. Firstly, it is integrated into the valve body. If you need to replace the TCM for any reason you are following the procedure above The seppos say these fail all the time. I haven't seen or heard of one on here or locally, but that doesn't mean it can't happen. Finally, Ecutek are now offering tuning for the 7 speed TCM. It is basically like ECU tuning in that you have to buy a license for the computer, and then known parameters can be reset. This is all very new and at the moment they are focussing on more aggressive gear holding in sports or sports+ mode, 2 gear launches for drag racing etc. It doesn't seem to affect shift speed like you can on some transmissions. Importantly for me, by having controllable shift points you can now raise the shift point as well as the ECU rev limit, together allowing it to rev a little higher when that is useful. In manual mode, my car shifts up automatically regardless of what I do which is good (because I don't have to worry about it) but bad (because I can't choose to rev a little higher when convenient).  TCMs can only be tuned from late 2016 onwards, and mine is apparently not one of those although the car build date was August 2016 (presumably a batch of ADM cars were done together, so this will probably be the situation for most ADM cars). No idea about JDM cars, and I'm looking into importing a later model valve body I can swap in. This is the top of my TCM A couple of numbers but no part number. Amayama can't find my specific car but it does say the following for Asia-RHD (interestingly, all out of stock....): So it looks like programable TCM are probably post September 2018 for "Asia RHD". When I read my part number out from Ecutek it was 31705-75X6D which did not match Amayama for my build date (Aug-2016)
×
×
  • Create New...