Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

We did some wool tuff testing at Wakefield. Just to get an understanding of what the air is doing behind the car.

It's on some serious drugs. The wool between the bar and the body work was being sucked into the gap.

rtv34rtc343.png

Finished off the wing end plates with some paint.

IMG_2102.jpg

Expander foam worked. Still needs a sand and body filler.

Running out of time for Winton on the 3rd, so 12mm plywood slitter will have to do.

The splitter still needs all the mounts fabed up and the air dam fitted,

IMG_2100.jpg

  • Like 1

Just out of 2mm alloy sheet. I'm unsure of the grade. They weigh 340g ea. Rigid enough.

They are pretty big (though not as big as the doors, they are the same ones from the previous page). Who knows if they provide any benefit, until we get them on. We're going to make up some smaller more convention ones as well, just to see what the difference maybe.

There is a theory that lowering the profile of the end plate after the gurney will increase it's effect.

Yep, those holes produce a huge amount of drag and screw up the front splitter.

Front turn in and more so grip through higher speed corners is far more pronounced. It's spooky science shit, but it does work.

That's interesting about blocking up the holes, I actually cut holes in my bar in those spots and meshed it, one side to feed the air intake and one side to feed the oil cooler.

Will be interesting to see how my car reacts now with the splitter on.

Car looks good mate. Another fellow r33 peddler.

If your splitter works well you may need to jack your wing up higher to get into some clean air flow so it can balance out the front. It looks a little low there. Usually flush with the roof line is a good height to guarantee unmolested airflow. It made a huge difference to our car when we did it.

Car looks good mate. Another fellow r33 peddler.

If your splitter works well you may need to jack your wing up higher to get into some clean air flow so it can balance out the front. It looks a little low there. Usually flush with the roof line is a good height to guarantee unmolested airflow. It made a huge difference to our car when we did it.

Yeh limited by class rules to the level of the roof line. That photo is deceptive, the end plate are level with the roof.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • There's plenty of OEM steering arms that are bolted on. Not in the same fashion/orientation as that one, to be sure, but still. Examples of what I'm thinking of would use holes like the ones that have the downward facing studs on the GTR uprights (down the bottom end, under the driveshaft opening, near the lower balljoint) and bolt a steering arm on using only 2 bolts that would be somewhat similarly in shear as these you're complainig about. I reckon old Holdens did that, and I've never seen a broken one of those.
    • Let's be honest, most of the people designing parts like the above, aren't engineers. Sometimes they come from disciplines that gives them more qualitative feel for design than quantitive, however, plenty of them have just picked up a license to Fusion and started making things. And that's the honest part about the majority of these guys making parts like that, they don't have huge R&D teams and heaps of time or experience working out the numbers on it. Shit, most smaller teams that do have real engineers still roll with "yeah, it should be okay, and does the job, let's make them and just see"...   The smaller guys like KiwiCNC, aren't the likes of Bosch etc with proper engineering procedures, and oversights, and sign off. As such, it's why they can produce a product to market a lot quicker, but it always comes back to, question it all.   I'm still not a fan of that bolt on piece. Why not just machine it all in one go? With the right design it's possible. The only reason I can see is if they want different heights/length for the tie rod to bolt to. And if they have the cncs themselves,they can easily offer that exact feature, and just machine it all in one go. 
    • The roof is wrapped
    • This is how I last did this when I had a master cylinder fail and introduce air. Bleed before first stage, go oh shit through first stage, bleed at end of first stage, go oh shit through second stage, bleed at end of second stage, go oh shit through third stage, bleed at end of third stage, go oh shit through fourth stage, bleed at lunch, go oh shit through fifth stage, bleed at end of fifth stage, go oh shit through sixth stage....you get the idea. It did come good in the end. My Topdon scan tool can bleed the HY51 and V37, but it doesn't have a consult connector and I don't have an R34 to check that on. I think finding a tool in an Australian workshop other than Nissan that can bleed an R34 will be like rocking horse poo. No way will a generic ODB tool do it.
    • Hmm. Perhaps not the same engineers. The OE Nissan engineers did not forsee a future with spacers pushing the tie rod force application further away from the steering arm and creating that torque. The failures are happening since the advent of those things, and some 30 years after they designed the uprights. So latent casting deficiencies, 30+ yrs of wear and tear, + unexpected usage could quite easily = unforeseen failure. Meanwhile, the engineers who are designing the billet CNC or fabricated uprights are also designing, for the same parts makers, the correction tie rod ends. And they are designing and building these with motorsport (or, at the very least, the meth addled antics of drifters) in mind. So I would hope (in fact, I would expect) that their design work included the offset of that steering force. Doesn't mean that it is not totally valid to ask the question of them, before committing $$.
×
×
  • Create New...