Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm after new O2 sensors for a Stagea 260RS (R33 RB26DETT) and judging by James' page (great page James) there is a Bosch alternative. I'm not a fan of cutting and joining wires. I wonder if the pins on the plug it comes with can be removed and put into the stock nissan plug. ANyone tried?

yes thats exactly how we did it. remove and replace the pins from the factory plig for the rear o2 sensor

Good stuff! Do you know which sensor it was that you ordered? Was it the Bosch one that's listed on James' page or something else?

Cool, thanks Duncan. I've got onto Global Spares to get two of the sensor quoted for the front. Let's see what they come up with..

Cheers

I read every page of this thread and found one post I think from a pilot who quoted a price of $256.00 for the pair of r33GTR o2 sensors, I think from Global auto spares,but I can't find it now ,anyone see that.Grey Pearl.
I read every page of this thread and found one post I think from a pilot who quoted a price of $256.00 for the pair of r33GTR o2 sensors, I think from Global auto spares,but I can't find it now ,anyone see that.Grey Pearl.
Further to my last post I rang Global Auto Spares and the numbers that keeper gave us for the GTR33 O2 SENSORS APPEAR TO BE WRONG,probably because the guy at global gave him the wrong info.

Apparently the correct global order no info for gtr33's is front:351-0019 $77.00 and rear 351-0019a $145.00 and apparently direct fitment no need to change plugs or wiring.Can anyone tell us if you have bought these items from Global and they fit??Cheers Grey Pearl.

Further to my last post I rang Global Auto Spares and the numbers that keeper gave us for the GTR33 O2 SENSORS APPEAR TO BE WRONG,probably because the guy at global gave him the wrong info.

Apparently the correct global order no info for gtr33's is front:351-0019 $77.00 and rear 351-0019a $145.00 and apparently direct fitment no need to change plugs or wiring.Can anyone tell us if you have bought these items from Global and they fit??Cheers Grey Pearl.

That part number is the same as what James has listed for the R32 GTR. If I'm not mistaken, the R32 uses a small size thread than the R33. I guess you could get one of those adapters. They're both Titania though aren't they (correct me if I'm wrong).

That part number is the same as what James has listed for the R32 GTR. If I'm not mistaken, the R32 uses a small size thread than the R33. I guess you could get one of those adapters. They're both Titania though aren't they (correct me if I'm wrong).
I really don't know I just quoted the part no's that keeper gave us and questioned Global over it as much as I could before he said he was too busy and had to go.He said it was definately the right fit up for gtr33 but now that you say that the numbers are the same as for gtr32 I know it's not a direct fit and now wonder which ones Duncan has been using for gtr33's.Cheers Grey Pearl.

33 gtr is the larger thread and 32 gtr the smaller. they output the same voltage so they are interchangeable - the ones you need depend on the dump pipe you are using, and most (all?) aftermarket dumps take the r33 size fittings.

ngk part # for r33 is OTD2F-P1P. direct fit for front sensor (3 pin plug).

They incorrectly show the same part# for r32

  • 2 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...

I have asked this in another thread

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/Ro...Ne-t223543.html

- but does the NGK O2 sensor for the R33 fit the R34 RB25DET Neo engines? appears it might but no one has 100% confirmed this in this thread...

Also could the air flow sensor also cause rough idle and high fuel consumption or is this purely the O2 sensor failure that causes this?

I have changed the Spark plugs already and the oil...

Amongst many other things, a rough idle could be the AFM itself, or an inbound air leak past the AFM. This particular problem (not saying this is yours though) is unmetered air passes into the system and the ECU is out of whack because [AFM recorded air flow] \= [actual air flow]

Fuel consumption is prob O2 sensor. From memory, if the AFM is stuffed, the car will have trouble even idling properly, let alone causing high fuel consumption. My experience is with RB26 though, so when one of my AFMs died the car could keep running.

FWIW.

Ok confirmed 100% wrong connector on the NGK O2 sensor for use with the R34 - I will solder the existing connector onto the sensor and hope it works...

BTW - my existing O2 sensor had a stack of black soot on the tip - what would this tend to indicate?

Well the NGK connector is light Grey and more solid looking with all the spade pins Vertical and positioned in the center of the connector. The R34 or BOSCH connector is black, maybe a fraction smaller and all the spade pins are Horizontal and thinner and positioned in the top area of the connector.

Might take some shots if I get around to it...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...