Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

E42 (42.5) just happens to be where I can get acceptable injector control and its easy to mix . Now that the United near work has it it's easy to get . Eflex is closer to home but 50 50 with that is E35 and they charge a bit more per litre of ethanol than United does . If you try to make E42 out of Eflex you need 12 of that and 8 of 98 and it gets too easy to screw it up . I have red jerries and black ones and add one of each in the high price cycle times out of my stash , bought when the cycle is low . Fug the Oil co's .

What injectors are you currently running again? I recall something off the shelf Jap ones.

Why not just run straight E85/80 (whatever us coming out of yhe bowser)? I'll put my car on the juice when it's tax return time, that way we can have a better comparison on ignition maps :)

What do you mean OE style Disco?

The short EV14's are 750, 1000 and 2000. There are also the new short 1400cc stainless internal e85 injectors...

If only someone would make an adapter to use top feeds in the side feed rail. You have the Neo rail there though don't you?

Yeah a while back I bought a Neo , Stag actually , fuel rail from Just Jap . I gather later RB Stags are the same as GTt rail wise ?

By OE I meant unmodified standard Bosch , I was wondering if they did anything in the 5-600cc range . I'd like to see the difference spray pattern wise between their biggest standard EV14 and a modified one like an Xspurt or ID . You're probably going to say just buy a set of those , I'm just trying to explore all possibilities to get the best all round result and accurate injector control is part of that . I'd like to be able to have 15:1 petrol type cruise mixtures and to do that I reckon you need injectors with good patterns at low flow rates .

1400cc versions I've only heard mentioned once before , I thought the stainless ones were 1300cc .

Latest update is that slightly more advanced timing did help the up to atmo manifold pressure and low boost torque even at sub 2000 revs . I suppose every time you take restrictions out of a turbo engines hot side you can screw more timing in at least at low boost pressures . Torque wise it's getting more like what the GTRS could do at low revs but mainly at constant loads and speeds , asking it to spin up and make power from low revs/gears and an accelerating engine is a different story . This would be the greater inertia and larger housings causing the turbine to lag behind engine revs until there is enough exhaust energy to kick it in the ribs .

Anyhow I'll give it a bit more advance in the same areas and see if it continues to Improve . Injectors have to wait a bit longer $ wise ATM but that will be the next mod .

A .

Not all the Xspurt injectors are modified, the smaller ones such as 300, 525 are original, they trim the plate off the front to extend the flow rates to 750 and 1000. These still have a great spray pattern though when compared to other 1000's, but they like high fuel pressure.

The 1400cc stainless injectors aren't a Bosch core, they are a new Denso or something. Not even listed under their Xspurt brand... I haven't tried a set yet, although I was thinking of upgrading mine to them at some point. I will be buying a set for the Evo too no doubt, as they are the largest petrol injector they have available, and it's designed for ethanol/methanol.

http://www.injectorsonline.com/indivprod.php?cid=74&scid=11

  • 5 months later...

Have had some interesting conversations with fairly on the know Garrett associated people's.... which made me think of Disco. The impending releases may result in some interesting threads appearing ;)

Let me guess. They're finally releasing the NS111 turbine in GT30 size?

I've made one my self, Its horribly laggy, I then decided to grind it down to 55mm for drive ability. There is a good reason why GT30x was made with an extra blade in the wheel. Take GTRS reading, using identical blade profile, every 1mm increase in diameter = 150RPM of lag, so you can work it out.

  • Like 1

About the only thing the TR30 turbine shared roughly was the exducer diameter at ~ 60mm .

Turbine housings were also unique as were the style of compressor wheel screwed on the other end .

The GT30 UHP turbine , like most in that family , were designed for diesel applications and partly the reason why the trim size is 84 . HKS merely asked Garrett to cast them in higher temp materials and fit a shaft to suit the GT25BB centre sections .

As for the smaller NS111 turbine , I always thought it looked like a development of the one used in the GTiRs T28 turbo . They were 10 bladed and used a larger 79 trim size from memory , both the car and the turbo were a flop effectively .

Everyone including Garretts engineers know they can do better than the GT30 UHP but I reckon they only ever will for an OE high volume app where someone else is paying the development costs .

BW seems to have the best all round turbines ATM so if Garrett is serious about being competitive the materials have to change .

A .

The 48T was the smallest and the 52 the mid trim .

Too busy with other things like working all round the clock and Saturday Sunday are just another day .

When I can get enough days off together it'll eventually go to Insight for a change of injectors rail reg and a tune .

I recently changed back to EFlex because the altered E85 made my car grumpy and gave poor fuel consumption - no matter how I tuned it . Plus I was paying 116.9L for E70 and its closer to home . United is near work but if I changed jobs its a 90 min round trip to replentish my stash - screw that . Getting ~ 400/tank mostly round town .

What I can say for sure is that this 52T is not laggy with a 0.82 IW housing , the engine itself could make a little more bottom end torque but its 148K old now and probably getting tired . 18 year old car with turbo tech that's older than that .

A .

Let me guess. They're finally releasing the NS111 turbine in GT30 size?

Not necessarily that - but possibly to similar effect in terms of frustration for the likes of yourself and Disco. We shall see.

Not necessarily that - but possibly to similar effect in terms of frustration for the likes of yourself and Disco. We shall see.

Something which sits in the 50lb/min flow range would have been my second guess...

Such a tease.

  • 2 weeks later...

You won't find anything, yet - but trust me, there will be stuff soon. I'm figuring you know me well enough that I won't say something like this unfounded :)

As a general idea, expect to see gaps filled in the Garrett turbine range... for sake of arguement, between GT28 and GT30s, GT30s and GT35s and GT35s and GT40s - and where necessary, the compressors to suit the matches.

An interesting one for example will probably be the GTW3476R :)

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...