Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Just weighin up where to mount turbo now im doing away with the twins..I have a GReddy high mountmanifold but the turbo sits more towards the rear, Other options are custom manifold with turbo mounted more forward or using an rb25 modded manifold.

What are your opinions?

  • Replies 41
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I don't mean to put sh!t on you Ben for your comment,

but- Screw the law,

just paint everything matt black.

Police only seem to see shiney things, they tried to get me for my alloy radiator in my Stagea but failed to see the 90 x 700 intercooler in front and all black cooler pipes!

But to your question, I would suggest seeing how well your dump pipe will fit?

Between the turbo and fire wall.

Edited by nicksamaniac

Mount it where it fits

^^what he said. If you are getting a custom item take the whole car and turbo and wastegate to the fabricator so that he can ensure the dump pipe will have a clear run and you won't foul the strut tower (or anything else).

The further forward you mount it the more clearance you will have for the 4 inch dump. ;)

If you can bring it forward enough to clear the shock tower with the hot pipe you will be doing very well. Of course this means a custom manifold, which is a lot of work.

More than 350kw if you weld an external gate to your turbo housing.

You should do that ^ and report back, no one has a solid idea on the limit of the standard manifold. It is generally accepted that its about 350kw absolute max on stock mani with internal wastegate.

:)

Edited by iruvyouskyrine

will modify the stock manifold for more flow. should turn out pretty stock looking.

No real need, they flow ok for what they are, and thinning it out by die grinding will only weaken an already fragile cast manifold.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...