Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hmmm greaaaaaat, so all or nothing then hhey :/ saw on a thread somewhere that someone was making 200kws with a hks something, I have ... or had 187 with stock turbo so I thought I could get away with something without a tune? Surely you wouldn't tune for 13 kws ?

Might

highflow turbo. low boost

Might as well just run the std turbo at 10 psi. Likelihood of it blowing at that level is low. Likelihood of it taking out the engine if it does blow is also low (unlike on RB26s where it seems to be near certain). Makes more sense than paying for upgraded turbo that will have more lag and make no more power because you're limiting yourself to no tune.

Depending on what the high flowed profile is.

We can highflow it to run on 10 to 22psi reliabily with factory alike response and drive ability on standard ecu.

Highflowed turbocharger is capable of supporting a maximum of 270rwkws on pump 98 and had customers making 320rwkws on e85 With supporting mods.

Depending on what the high flowed profile is.

We can highflow it to run on 10 to 22psi reliabily with factory alike response and drive ability on standard ecu.

Highflowed turbocharger is capable of supporting a maximum of 270rwkws on pump 98 and had customers making 320rwkws on e85 With supporting mods.

This could be read as it is safe to run 22psi on the stock ecu with a highflow, which is very wrong.

Please fix your post so we keep everything accurate.

What is the correct maximum amount of boost you have safely run on a stock ECU with a highflow?

  • Like 1

yes i have massive trust issues with the r33 stock turbo, as it went and the motor ate the compressor wheel and it apparently didnt taste good.
so looks like high flow or nothing at this stage, estimated price to high flow a 33 turbo

also can anyone give me more info on the 34 turbo?

also my 33 turbo went while i was running 9psi, hasnt run anything more in the time that ive owned it either ...

how would the car perform with the highflow turbo and no tune?

I will post a photo of my turbo for more understanding haha

Worse than stock. As I posted above. More lag, no more boost (in fact less boost).

Alright, it might not be that bad, it might even be slightly better. But why f**k about? Just put a bloody ECU in it.

  • Like 1

yeah that would have been the plan if i didnt do some serious motor damage when the turbo went, so now im up for mass coin
thats why hiflow would be good if i got the same or some performance? then later on i can get an ecu, injectors etc and make good power without changing the turbo again

Your ECU wont allow you to make more power with a highflow, it will hit R&R and make the engine hesitate.

What you are after is a standard highflow getting rid of the ceramic wheel. It wont make more power but will live as long as you will own the car.

Will also give you the option of running more boost in the future once you obtain a tune-able ECU.

  • Like 1

Or slap in a highflow and get in touch with Toshi (forums sponsor) for an off the shelf remap using your stock afm, stock injectors, etc. so you can up the boost without falling off the map with your stock tune.

Old turbo died and took out motor... coin spent on new motor, ideally wants more power, but doesnt want to spend more money... hmmmmmmm

I would rather spend $900 on a cheap nistune + tune than getting a different turbo for "reliability".

Your ECU wont allow you to make more power with a highflow, it will hit R&R and make the engine hesitate.

What you are after is a standard highflow getting rid of the ceramic wheel. It wont make more power but will live as long as you will own the car.

Will also give you the option of running more boost in the future once you obtain a tune-able ECU.

This sounds like good advice.

more power isnt really an issue i just dont want another stock turbo to shit itself and dont want to spend even more money on a tune

p.s where can you get a 500 dollar nistune?!?!??!? a friend of mine pain 1200?

also how much would just changing the rear wheel cost ?



Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...