Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

http://page14.auctions.yahoo.co.jp/jp/auction/s468871332

found complete one off turbo kit from japan doubt instructions are included

"The mounting requires cutting of reinforcement. " Im going to assume that'd be more trouble than its worth

"The mounting requires cutting of reinforcement. " Im going to assume that'd be more trouble than its worth

Meh, I carved great chunks out of my FRP reo to fit a radiator; its the Stagea way.

If you don't need to cut anything; you're not trying hard enough.

  • Like 2

Review Hypergear SS2-M35

If you are not willing to run E85, aftermarket ECU, upgraded FMIC, brake wire mod, big exhaust(from dump back), big intake pipe(3"), big injectors, kitted transmission, big fuel pump, no cat convertor, modded BOV: ==>DO NOT RUN THIS TURBO<==

Without "all" of the above mods the car is an absolute pig to drive below 4000rpm and part throttle. Even with the above mods this turbo will not make 20psi by 3700 as advertised(that was on an Rb25 with different housings and is misleading advertising)...however it will with all mods start to make "some" boost below 4000rpm which makes it bearable in everyday traffic. Is the trade off worth it for the power output ?...no not at all, the problem is package constraints so we are very limited by choice if we want an easier fitment. The only place this turbo would be faster than the smaller high flow is acceleration from 50km/h or higher. A Garrett 3071 or Borg Warner 6258 or 6758 are much better options for average power "if" you are willing to make them fit. I was told on purchase that the SS2-M35 would be reasonably responsive then to be told on delivery it's response would equal a 3076 .82 with the power of close to a 3071 .6 which I would agree with.

Matt

Edited by BoostdR
  • Like 2

The higher stall convertor is a band aid solution. I would rather fix the problem rather than the symptom. I don't even think it would slip enough for this turbo whilst still being streetable(shaft speed differential for lock-up)

Review Hypergear SS2-M35

If you are not willing to run E85, aftermarket ECU, upgraded FMIC, big exhaust(from dump back), big intake pipe(3"), big injectors, kitted transmission, big fuel pump, no cat convertor, modded BOV: ==>DO NOT RUN THIS TURBO<==

Without "all" of the above mods the car is an absolute pig to drive below 4000rpm and part throttle. Even with the above mods this turbo will not make 20psi by 3700 as advertised(that was on an Rb25 with different housings and is misleading advertising)...however it will with all mods start to make "some" boost below 4000rpm which makes it bearable in everyday traffic. Is the trade off worth it for the power output ?...no not at all, the problem is package constraints so we are very limited by choice if we want an easier fitment. The only place this turbo would be faster than the smaller high flow is acceleration from 50km/h or higher. A Garrett 3071 or Borg Warner 6258 or 6758 are much better options for average power "if" you are willing to make them fit. I was told on purchase that the SS2-M35 would be reasonably responsive then to be told on delivery it's response would equal a 3076 .82 with the power of close to a 3071 .6 which I would agree with.

Matt

Interesting. what Kw are you getting with your stagea, if you don't mind me asking? im going to try my luck with a HX35/2, We shall see what happens lol.

looks like the Holset HX35 has decent Surge resistance I wonder if that is with the anti-surge comp cover which will reduce efficiency up top slightly. There are many factors which will make or break the response. I've seen mixed results.

I don't have a solid figure for the SS2 yet. Giving It the best chance to perform I can. I'll post up results once I've exhausted its flow capacity. I expect 270-300kw

post-49288-0-37400500-1446003857_thumb.jpg

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
    • You are all good then, I didn't realise the port was in a part you can (have!) remove. Just pull the broken part out, clean it and the threads should be fine. Yes, the whole point about remote mounting is it takes almost all of the vibration out via the flexible hose. You just need a convenient chassis point and a cable tie or 3.
×
×
  • Create New...