Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

In the coming weeks I aim to embark on making an undertray for my R33.

Thinking about making it out of 3-ply with a fiberglass overlay.

But what I would like to see is how people have mounted theirs under the car and if you have made any channels in it for super mega downforce.

Cheers

Andrew

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/445884-home-made-splittersundertrays/
Share on other sites

Composite signboard, approx. 4.5mm thick and reasonably flex free. Runs back to the steering rack.

No fancy channels. No splitter section as yet. I consider it is simple design.

Was a bit fiddly to get the whole thing in place. Time permitting I will put some pics up on my R33 build thread.

will it have to meet any CAMS regs? Prod cars, IPRA and Sports Sedans all have very specific rules about allowable sizes

BTW James has what seems to be a good one on his car, seemed to be a bit fiddly to put on but is working well

will it have to meet any CAMS regs? Prod cars, IPRA and Sports Sedans all have very specific rules about allowable sizes

BTW James has what seems to be a good one on his car, seemed to be a bit fiddly to put on but is working well

Nah,

Just track days and the odd hill climb

If it means running SV than I'll run SV

James (GrumbleBee) said he found a noticeable gain in front end grip when he fitted his. I'd say designed properly there are definite gains to be had. Designed poorly, well, you could end up with less downforce!

  • 2 weeks later...

Simple setup I ran for a couple of years.
I like ally as it's easy to work with even though it's not the lightest. Very noticeable gains at PI and EC through long fast sweeping corners even though it was just flat underneath.

post-10715-0-72359600-1406810077_thumb.jpg

post-10715-0-04651600-1406810087_thumb.jpg

post-10715-0-99314600-1406810100_thumb.jpg

  • Like 2

At speed...

1) If front splitter and connecting undertray are flat with negligible air disturbance > negative pressure under front of the car > front 'sticks' to the tarmac.

2) If the rear wing is set up to create downforce > rear 'sticks' to the tarmac.

1) + 2) > all's good

At speed...

1) If front splitter and connecting undertray are flat with negligible air disturbance > negative pressure under front of the car > front 'sticks' to the tarmac.

2) If the rear wing is set up to create downforce > rear 'sticks' to the tarmac.

1) + 2) > all's good

What if one works a lot better than the other?

The sort of front end device we're talking about won't really produce downforce to the extent that aero loading increases the effective vehicle weight above static.

An effective splitter design should protrude a fair bit, and its height above the ground has a big bearing on efficiency/effectiveness.

The outcome I found with my undertray (no splitter) is noticeable reduction in high speed understeer, less tendency to run wide through high speed sweepers. More front grip at speed is good :yes:.

The sort of front end device we're talking about won't really produce downforce to the extent that aero loading increases the effective vehicle weight above static.

An effective splitter design should protrude a fair bit, and its height above the ground has a big bearing on efficiency/effectiveness.

The outcome I found with my undertray (no splitter) is noticeable reduction in high speed understeer, less tendency to run wide through high speed sweepers. More front grip at speed is good :yes:.

That's exactly what I wanted to hear.

I don't even have the factory undertray atm and my car is horrible at taking high speed corners.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Ha, well, it's been.... a bit of a journey. Things have taken much longer than I'd hoped. I'll probably put up a thread at some stage. Hopefully soon. The car's not done any kms since my update in June though, put it that way.
    • Here's the chart for fuel pressure vs. current draw, assuming your base fuel pressure is 3 bar and you run like 0.5bar boost on WOT, you should only momentarily hit 9amps here and there. (Ignore my prev post, I cannot read a chart these days it seems)
    • Those comp test results are not hideous. Whether they are accurate or not (ie, when that comp tester says 140 psi, is the real pressure120, 140 or 160?) is unknown to us. The state of the battery used to crank it over is unknown, etc etc. Many people around here would say that the absolute values and the spread are perfectly fine to just add boost and keep going. I personally would be happier with a narrower spread than that, but even the diff between 125 and 145 is not terrible. That one cylinder at 125 though, has probably copped some damage relative to the others. You should inspect the valves seeing as you've got it open. Do you know how to measure installed ring gaps? That, and an inspection of the rings themselves, is how you will determine whether they need to be replaced. If you're not good to do these things, take the block and the pistons and rings to a shop that is, and ask them for the go/no-go on them. Do the bores need a hone at all? If so, you might well be justified in getting some different pistons in order to get away from the ring supply problem. Whether you're happy to spend a lot more money right now, on more gear, rather than less money, but an amount that looks stupid given that you will only get a handful of rings in exchange for that money, is for you to decide.
    • also possibly backed up to my filler and shat down it! 🤣
    • Ok so i would love some advice here please, i purchased an R33 a few months back and its had a few mods done to the engine, its an RB25det running a Master ECU, 1200cc injectors, bigger turbo, oil cooler, oil filter relocation kit, Spool H-beam rods, acl/ross pistons. When i removed the motor from the vehicle (as its getting a respray) i thought i would compression test it and these are the following results. Cylinder 1-145psi, Cylinder 2-143psi, Cylinder 3-125psi, Cylinder 4-145psi, Cylinder 5-140psi, Cylinder 6-135psi this test was done with the motor on the ground and powering up the starter motor. I dropped the sump and found broken oil squirters on cylinder 3,5 and 6. I was told my rings are probably worn so i stripped the motor completely to get a new set of rings for it. The trouble is no one has these rings anywhere and they have to be custom made by Ross over in the states and will cost about $600+$200 delivery. My question is how can i tell if my rings are at fault and if they are still ok and is this price ok for a set of rings?
×
×
  • Create New...