Jump to content
SAU Community

R34 Vs R35 - Not School Holidays Yet, This Is Not What You Think.


Recommended Posts

Tbh really you're paying for function or form.

The R35 is better in every way. It is.

Value for money speaking, the R34 is really quite a joke when seen through non-nostalgic eyes, there's absolutely no way they should ever be considered close in price to a R35. The R33 GTR is priced appropriately. The R35 GTR is priced "appropriately".

People paying 70+ for a R34 GTR need their head checked, no matter how clean it is. It has at that point left the realm of logical thought and no amount of logical discussion will sway such a person, because logic is no longer applying ;)

Would you pay 70k+ for the cleanest R33 GTR? It's almost what you're doing. 40k premium for a facelift? The R35 is a facelift with a lot of extras over the 34.

You said it's mainly for the street. One of them (not the 34) is going to be noticeably better for the street.

All of the objective reasons in the world are pointing directly in the 35's favour.

Hah, harsh, but I see the point you're making. The value of a car is what the market will tolerate, and at present it is tolerating those prices.

What's your personal experience with each?

The best comparison I've read was in MOTOR Dan.

May 2008. All GTRs are compared and critiqued. This was a main feature.

Greg, you're entitled to your own opinion but many will differ. Anomalies have occurred over the ages. I mean, why would a XY Phase III be worth so much when it was whopped by an XU-1? I could have picked up a Bathurst winner in a XJS with 38,000 Km until my Mum's friend a widow, realised how little it would pull in dollar terms.

Auction prices in Japan serve to dictate BNR34 values here depending on what model. We here in Oz simply reflect that. Maybe Nissan should bring out an N1 R35 -with no leather, no air, no radio/speakers etc?

Don't get me wrong, I understand as good as anyone how subjective value is still value.

And cars beyond your basic corolla are really all subjective value. Noone 'needs' a high performance anything.

What do you get for a R34 over a R33, really. A bodykit? How much time do you spend looking at that bodykit when you're driving the car around? What's the ratio looking at it vs utilizing it as a vehicle?

Personally I have no subjective view of either. But if you could give me one or the other, as an objective choice, for what you have specified you want the car for, it's kind of a no brainer man. The cars really shouldn't be similar prices, and most of the time they aren't.

A nice clean (actually clean) R34 GTR for 45K vs a brand new R35 for 180K there's obviously a different scenario. But if they're both similar price, then, well. Objectively there's no decision to make.

Subjectively, it's all on you, man. You probably won't be upset with either, which is a good thing!

I get what you're saying.

A few of your comments start me on a different tangent too, in terms of R34 values.

Yes the VS2 is closish to the 35 dollar wise, but I could always just buy a nice VS1 for less and then the gap is much bigger. But the black interior and carbon bonnet are so sexy and buying a late model non vspec to get the black interior means having to buy the front and rear aero.

I realise the 34 is mechanically not hugely different to the 33. Looks and interior are very different though.

I was also tossing up between an R34 and an R35.

The R34 really has a front end look that will always be admired.

At the end of the day I went with the R35.

Edited by scarf

tempted to say drive both and go with your head not heart..

I love the 35 but.....

the idea of a 34 with the price difference between the 2 spent on it ( cosmetics and mechanically) just stirs my loins

Funny, because my heart says R34, it's my head that says consider the 35 because of how much better it is.

Initially though, I'd be comparing higher priced VS2s, but after reconsidering that a nicely modded VS1 could be a winner as well, the price gap widens a fair bit.

I will drive both when the time comes though and I expect prices to have moved around a bit too with the upcoming R36 (which just makes me think VW).

Not sure what most peoples budgets are but even the 09 gtr is still going for high 90's where as the R34gtr is around the mid 40's depending on specs.

I have seen some r34s around the 70's which someone covered before as being a joke. Mods dont add resale value like extensions on a house so why people insist on trying to add 20-30K to the price tag is beyond me but hey if they can find someone to buy it for that price then power to them. It would appear that if you want a r34 then the best bet is to import one.

Ill try and test drive a 35 first but I cant afford $100,000 plus for the new and improved version.

I really like the feedback on this topic as I was curious as to how people view both the 34 and the new gtr.

Its all personal prefernace, me perosnally. The shape of the R34 i cant stand. Some R32's done the way i like look good.

But the R33 for me is hands down the best, id put $150k into a R33 GTR long before i bought a R35

Speed/power is not an issue really, put enough $$ into either one and it will be a very quick car

I don't understand how this is even a question?

10 years made a massive difference in car manufacturing.

Edited by Anfanee

And quite a few dollars in purchase, service, repair and modification costs.

Plus nostalgia in the sense that, for me, the R34 was 'the' car. It was attainable, but it was special.

The same reason guys are still rebuilding SLR5000s

So after having a conversation with my mechanic about the R34 vs R35 subject i was told the R35's have transmission problems and to fix it properly is to do a clutch pack and some transmission solenoids or something along those lines aswell as be prepared to spend 20k to fix it.

^^ Nope. Still a problem. They haven't changed much.

My gripe is why do you have launch control on a warranted car and then say launch control is 'for race use only'.

I've heard of warranties being voided because of excessive use of launch control. Why even have it then?

Nissan then exploits the crazy fast 0-100 time with launch control as their point of difference.

Ghaaay.

Not a cheap issue to avoid either is it? A few K for solenoids, clips, and new fluid etc?

LC is not a big deal to me as I have too much mechanical sympathy for that, I get what you're saying though, why have it if you can't use it.

That said, my view on performance cars has always been pay to play, in that a car might be capable of a particular feat, but that doesn't mean you can do it all day every day and not expect the car to put up with it.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I will rebutt this and the preceding point from Dose....but without doing any calcs to demonstrate anything and without knowing that I am right or wrong. But... The flow capacity of a fluid transfer system is not limited by the smallest orifice or section of conduit in that system, unless it is drastically smaller than the rest of the system. OK, I use the word drastically perhaps with too much emphasis, but let's drill down on what I really mean. The flow capacity of the system is the result of the sum of the restrictions of the entire system. So, to make an extreme example, if you have a network with 3" pipe everywhere (and let's say a total length of only a few metres) and that 12mm ID restriction of the oil filter connection being the obvious restriction, then for any given amount of pressure available, the vast majority of all the pressure drop in the system is going to occur in the 12mm restriction. But.... increase the length of the 3" pipeline to, say 1000m, and suddenly the pipe pressure loss will likely add up to either be in the same order of magnitude, possibly even exceeding that of the 12mm restriction. Now the 12mm restriction starts to matter less. Translate this to the actual engine, actual oil cooler hose sizing, etc etc, and perhaps: The pressure loss caused by flowing through the narrow section (being the 12mm oil filter port, and perhaps any internal engine oil flow pathways associated with it) is a certain number. The pressure loss through, say, -12 hoses out to the cooler and back is negligible, but The pressure loss through -10 hoses out to the cooler, at the exact same length as the above, starts to become a decent fraction of the loss through the 12mm stuff at the filter port. Maybe even it starts to exceed it. I could actually do these calcs if I knew 1) how much oil was actually flowing in the line, 2) gave enough of a f**k to do things that I hate doing for work, voluntarily for a hypothetical discussion. Anyway - I reiterate. It's not the narrowest port that necessarily determines how much it can all flow. It is the sum. A long enough length of seemingly fat enough pipe can still cause more loss than a semmingly dominant small bore restriction.
    • To pick up what Dose is putting down. Not a lot of point running a huge hose if the motor is still restricted to the smaller size... It's only capable of flowing so much at that point...   *Waits for GTSBoy to come in and bring in the technicalities of length of pipe, and additional restriction from wall friction etc etc*
    • Hooley Dooley these things have some history! If i sell them they will need a certificate of providence to prove they have been in the hands of verified RB20 royalty! They have been stored in a plastic tub, away from sunlight and moisture. They are in mint condition. And they will stay that way, as i have sprung the money for a set of shockworks coilovers. I'm just working on getting them in at the moment, after rebushing the rear of the car, and while the subframe was out i welded in the GKtech reinforcement bracing as well.  They will get a workout at Ararat King of The Hill in November. I ran 48s on the short course there a few months ago, and i am hoping with new bushes and shocks in the rear i can launch a bit harder. There was a fair bit of axle tramp when i tried too hard off the line. a few of the corners had dips mid way which also made the car feel a bit unsettled, hopefully this will help there too.   
    • Food for thought, the stock oil filter thread is a 3/4-16 UNF, which has an ID of about 10 to 12mm (according to ChatGPT lol). Now compare than to an 10AN, which has an ID of about 14mm (Raceworks is 14.2mm, Speed flow is 14.27mm).  
    • Yep, totally get that. However hooking in for Generator back up is only a few hundred bucks for the wiring. You could put a couple of those in (for different circuits explicitly) and run a couple of baby generators. Bonus, you can balance them across different circuits, and now have backups in your backup. I'm looking at buying places that won't even have water etc, and I don't mind the idea of getting off the electric grid either, even with everything you've said. This country already has enough power outages that even the mains grid isn't that reliable anymore. I do agree though on spending a bit more to get better gear, and to add some extra redundancy in to the system too.
×
×
  • Create New...