Jump to content
SAU Community

Wheel Alignment Question, Car Feeling More Skittish

V28VX37
 Share

Recommended Posts

V28VX37 Veteran

V28VX37

Posted
Posted

Hi guys,

My R34 has felt a bit more skittish recently, especially on poor or corrugated surface on off camber slopes. It's a bit hard to describe but it feels less planted than I remember, especially on crappier asphalt. Another sensation is this kind of slight 'sideways skip' on a bend if there's reduced grip due to a pothole.

The only thing that's changed is that I had new tyres put on (exact same brand tyre and size as before, Goodyear Early F1 Asym 2) and they did alignment at the same time. Can someone please have a look at the two alignment sheets below and let me know if there's anything suss about the new one?

Thanks heaps!


2013 alignment done at TruTrack to suit my preference:
15010752158_41745083cb_n.jpg

2014 alignment done at a local shop to whatever their computer threw up by the looks of things:
15010534119_bc60a2b61b_c.jpg

  • Replies 86
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Duncan
Duncan

you calling me stupid motherf**ker?

Duncan
Duncan

I'd call them and ask. front toe looks strange/very uneven and rear toe is definitely not correct, you could not drive it like that. might be user error, machine not calibrated properly or even no a

KiwiRS4T
KiwiRS4T

Your original settings look fine. I find you have to take a firm line with wheel alignment people. Explain, if necessary, that you are paying them to do what you want not what they want . I give them

V28VX37 Veteran

V28VX37

Posted
  • Author
Posted

still using hicas?

Great question, yes I am. Didn't think of that - the fact that the skittishness is more pronounced at higher speeds (60 km/h+) might suggest that HICAS is mucking things up?

Also the rest of the suspension is as follows:

  • BC BR coilovers with F:6, R:5 springs
  • ARC swaybars front and rear
  • Adjustable camber arms front and rear
  • Adjustable radius rods in front
  • 20mm spacers front and rear with stock R34 GTT wheels
MrStabby Grand Master

MrStabby

Posted
Posted

Toe out = car wants to change direction/turn in/tramline, toe in = stable. I'm no expert but having any toe out on the rear looks weird to me, and may well explain what you're seeing. FWIW I run 0 toe front and rear.

Duncan Grand Master

Duncan

Posted
Posted

I'd call them and ask. front toe looks strange/very uneven and rear toe is definitely not correct, you could not drive it like that.

might be user error, machine not calibrated properly or even no alignment done on the rear

really surprised they gave you a sheet looking like that, it is definitely not correct

  • Like 1
vetter2769 Proficient

vetter2769

Posted
Posted

I just had my 34 aligned, ill post up the sheet tomorrow so you can compare mate!

But yeah my mates r33 used to jump around and was "skittish" when you hit bumps, sort of as you described.. he deleted hicas and problem went away.

V28VX37 Veteran

V28VX37

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks guys! I'll need to take it back. Bloody hell, this is what you get when you do a cheap alignment ... they scratched one of the rims pretty thoroughly, too :/

KiwiRS4T Grand Master

KiwiRS4T

Posted
Posted

Your original settings look fine. I find you have to take a firm line with wheel alignment people. Explain, if necessary, that you are paying them to do what you want not what they want . I give them the specs and tell them to achieve them. If the figures they gave you are correct that alignment is ridiculous. That amount of toe out at the rear will make you wander all over the place. Your original castor settings for the front would give you straight line stability at high speed - why would you want to reduce that?

I would go back to them with your original chart and tell them that's what you want. if you didn't do that the first time then they have a case for making you pay again ...but their "alignment" is just no good.

  • Like 1
V28VX37 Veteran

V28VX37

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Thanks KiwiRS4T. Yes I gave them the sheet first time, I think they just completely ignored it. Shouldn't have allowed them to touch the alignment in the first place, got blinded by the cheap price :/

drifttyres Apprentice

drifttyres

Posted
Posted

Rear Toe is very bad !! if that print out is correct you will be getting excessive wear already. The Front camber is out side to side as well and the castor isnt 100% perfect but this may be becuase the adjustment isnt there, although you said you have adjustable camber / radius rods so it should be.

I have a shop in Moorabbin if you would like to come down we can do it correctly. Price ranges between $55 and $110 depending on time spent. 03 9555 6325 City Discount Tyres

Ive had lots of Nissans and my Wheel alignment guy is very knowledgeable about all things Nissan.

If that alignment was cheap it might be best to just take it somewhere that can do it right to save a repeat of a poor effort

V28VX37 Veteran

V28VX37

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Took the car back in a massive rush this morning, results below. Rear toe is better but still nowhere near right, and they've mucked up castor big time. Apparently they can only align to whatever's on the computer, what bs.

This place is in Fawkner, if anyone wants the name I'm happy to PM it through so you can avoid it. I'll take the car back to TruTrack next week so they can do it right.

15182898096_efeaee234c_c.jpg

V28VX37 Veteran

V28VX37

Posted
  • Author
Posted

I think you need a refund, and get it done somewhere else.

BTW congratulations, this time your R31 has morphed into a 240K

LOL, one manufactured in 2011 no less!

dvd50l Contributor

dvd50l

Posted
Posted

That alignment is so wrong it's not even funny, if the guy doing the wheel alignment can only set them up to what the computer says then he clearly has no idea what he is doing, I am a mechanic have been for ten years and being doing wheel alignments since I was a second year apprentice and I have seen some shocking alignments from tyre shops

V28VX37 Veteran

V28VX37

Posted
  • Author
Posted

Yep it's booked in at TruTrack for Thursday for a proper alignment.

I can't believe the local shop claims to be 'wheels and tyres' yet have zero idea about alignment. Stay away.

  • 6 months later...
Nismo 3.2ish Grand Master

Nismo 3.2ish

Posted
Posted

Skittish sounds about right for my R34GTR, on a straight line, 60 to 100Klms , on crappy roads mine can get very skittish, follows everything and can be a bit scary when you over take and it happens. Starting to think I was getting skittish, :)

First 4WD I have had and ever felt anything this bad. The alignment was very bad, the steering wheel was about 10 degrees off centre and was much better after the alignment, BUT ?

Around twisty road it is sensational and never a problem ?

Do not know about toe and will look it up so I can understand what could be going on.

The tyres on at the moment are 255 on 10" Advan rims and looked stretched but the recommended size is 265 , so not a lot of difference ?

Having some new 265 tyres on soon and will get another alignment and see how it goes and post the results so I can get some feed back/ help.

Nismo 3.2ish Grand Master

Nismo 3.2ish

Posted
Posted

Just had a look at toe , if anything I have negative toe the way it will go where the road wants to take the car and you have to be ready for it all the time, takes a bit of the pleasure out of the drive on some roads :(

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • PranK
      New Skyline will be RWD and manual

      By PranK · Posted

    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      No, you're wrong, and you've always been wrong about this. The Nismo has 2 sets of openings. One is a real 2-way, and the other is a 1-way. There is no 1.5-way possible with the ramps that they offer. A real 1.5-way does exist. That Cusco stuff I posted is a prime example. If the forward drive ramps are, say 55°, and the overrun ramps are, say, 30°, then you will get about half as much LSD effect on overrun than you do on drive. It is real, it realy works. OK, you're slightly right. The Nismo has 55° and 45° ramps on the 2-way, so it does offer less LSD effect on overrun. But, I think that just means that they've (probably) sensibly established that you do not want actually equal LSD effect on overrun. You just want "quite a lot, but not quite as much as the drive LSD effect".
    • DraftySquash
      Newbie from VIC

      By DraftySquash · Posted

      Just wanted to unearth this and post my baby with the new front ❤️😝 Took her to my wedding rehearsal today. Next up is getting wide skirts (after wedding)
    • Kinkstaah
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      Yea, that is what I was getting at in my ramblings too. The nismo one actually is a 1.5 way and a 1 way. They don't do a *2* way because a true *2* way would have equal ramp angles. Or is that a true 1.5 way? Realistically I think a "1.5 way" does not actually exist. A diff can either lock in two directions or one. It also doesn't help that a LOT of people in Australia speak about 1.5 way diffs are referring to their 1 way diff.
    • GTSBoy
      Nismo GT Pro LSD configurations

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Well, the trouble with that ^^ is: The configuration shown is absolutely a 1-way, not a 1.5-way. There is no way that a 1.5-way can be said to offer LSD action only on acceleration. If Nismo cannot get that right, then it is impossible to believe their documentation. That ^ is not a 1.5 way setup. That is a 1-way.   And so now I have allowed all doubts to flourish and have gone back to look at the MotoIQ video. I originally made the mistake of believing him when he said "this is a 1.5-way" at the ~6:10 mark. Because what he did was take the gear assembly out of the 2-way opening and just rotate it one place to the left to drop it into the 1-way opening. When he dropped it in there, the cam was "backwards" compared to the correct orientation shown in all other photos of that config. The flat shold have been facing the 1° ramp side of the opening, not the 55° ramp side. And I thought, "gee that's cute", but I was concerned at the time, when he put the other ring back on, that the gap between the rings looked like it was wider then in the 2-way config. And then I said a lot of things in my long post on Tuesday that could only make sense if the guy from MotoIQ was correct about what he'd done. BUT... I have now done my homework. I grabbed a frame of the video with the 2-way config, and then grabbed another with the "1.5-way" config, snipped out the cam and opening of that frame and just pasted it direct on top of the 2-way config. I scaled it so that the triangular opening was almost exactly the same height in both. AND.... the gap between the plates is wider with the cam installed in the triangualr opening backwards. That is.... it cannot go together that way. There would be massive force on the plates all the time, if you could even reassemble it.  So, My statement on the matter? The Nismo diff is actually only a 2-way and 1-way. There is no 1.5-way option in it, regardless of what they say. Here's a photo of a real 1.5-way ramp opening from Cusco (along with the 1 way option). And the full set of 1 through 2 way options from their racing diff, which is not same-same as what we'd typically be using, but...the cams work the same. A little blurry, but it comes from this Cusco doc, which is quite helpful. AND.... Cusco do in fact do what I suggested would be sensible, which is to have rings that do 1 and 1.5, and 1.5 and 2. Separately.  
×
×
  • Create New...