Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

also selling my kit as i didn't want to remove my ross balancer.

Cameron have you finished with this project or are going to try and design another kit?
has anyone thought about using factory cas for start position then something off the crank or flywheel>

Hi Robert,

At this stage I am done with the kit however if anyone is wanting custom changes etc. I am happy to work with them to produce one offs etc.

I do not at this time have room for different blocks and rotating assemblies to work on different designs.

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Long time, no reply and I'm sure this will likely only help a few people but here is what I did to solve the tomei oil pump interference and smaller diameter fluidampr issue. Modified Murrayis's mount, rotated the mount, added a cylindrical spacer, tapped the actual sensor and I'll be cutting notches in my crank balancer. I'm going to go with (12x) .300" wide x .300" long and about .100" deep. The sensor is based on changes in magnetic field and should still pick them up even though the notches won't be totally through. Range on the sensor is .018-.080" inch. My .100" or so shouldn't affect it. I don't want to have a belt have the chance of getting freyed on notches.

post-136202-0-40708300-1454289032_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-55908800-1454289058_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-64283800-1454289078_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-43377300-1454289098_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-37808500-1454289122_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-81909900-1454289141_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-48400800-1454289162_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-48883900-1454289178_thumb.jpg

LOL...exactly. Trust me I felt bad grinding and chopping on such a nicely machined part, but hey it's working and feels totally solid. And I left my spacer short so I can shim under it and move the sensor closer to the crank pulley if needed after I really torque it on the crank.

  • 7 months later...

Hey guys just got my car tuned at horsepower solutions and wanted to share my results from this trigger kit. Brief description is its a r32 with fully built 2630 running a forced performance super 94 with all supporting mods. I used a ross balancer and trigger wheel with murrayis kit. Worked a treat with only thing to do is space it apart with shims. Below are some pics

20160522_113751.thumb.jpg.a82e467049f4d5167ec05871193ad2d4.jpg

20160516_193243.thumb.jpg.cb332520835c5625b6f532176fd62f62.jpg

20160424_104640.thumb.jpg.3a0aad1a0e744f964b1bc0477f75c68c.jpg

20160412_164559.thumb.jpg.f75bc517bac3dcc7434bb7c102cb1b86.jpg

20160831_173822.thumb.jpg.d2134200586f1558bde942c19b4d3039.jpg

20160522_113751.jpg

20160516_193243.jpg

20160424_104640.jpg

20160412_164559.jpg

20160831_173822.jpg

On 04/12/2015 at 9:36 PM, BlackBox said:

Hmm I really want to come up with a solution that doesn't require a gaping hole in the cover...

You can always just change to a custom made single window disc for the existing CAS instead of the the Murrayis cam trigger, that's what I'm doing.

 

You can always just change to a custom made single window disc for the existing CAS instead of the the Murrayis cam trigger, that's what I'm doing.

 



I've already got the kit and got my balancer machined and re-balanced.. I am going to get a timing cover 3d printed to suit what I need

The last one I got was about $80, but that was for a CA18. Autronic sell them so do NZ efi. Just don't connect the REF to the ECU and use the Sync off the exhaust cam.

http://www.nzefi.com/product/24-tooth-cam-angle-sensor-disk-nissan-sr20det-rwd/

 

Maybe Matt could write different code for the CAS.  The Nissan one is providing 360 degree slots plus the 5 or 6 on the other circle.  The code might be easily enough altered to expect an arbitrary number of pulses on either of those.  Or maybe it would be a horrible exercise.  I'm not too au fait with decompiling the code out of (anything really) these ECUs.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Hi all, Long time since I've posted here. Looking for some advice on what I can remove to further identify the cause of my issues.  I can move the passenger seat forward and back but the knob used to adjust the seat angle is pretty much free spinning, there's very little resistance.  Removing the side cover I can see that the chain is intact but the shaft for the adjustment spins without the gear attached to it moving.  What's my next step for disassembly here? Is this a common fault? Just being a little cautious as I didn't want to start removing bolts for a spring to fly out or something equally as stupid.  Cheers
    • Those above shitboxes, mediocre and above usually have a turbo strapped to them, hence the slightly higher octane is required.  
    • Hi all,   long time listener, first time caller   i was wondering if anyone can help me identify a transistor on the climate control unit board that decided to fry itself   I've circled it in the attached photo   any help would be appreciated
    • I mean, I got two VASS engineers to refuse to cert my own coilovers stating those very laws. Appendix B makes it pretty clear what it considers 'Variable Suspension' to be. In my lived experience they can't certify something that isn't actually in the list as something that requires certification. In the VASS engineering checklist they have to complete (LS3/NCOP11) and sign on there is nothing there. All the references inside NCOP11 state that if it's variable by the driver that height needs to maintain 100mm while the car is in motion. It states the car is lowered lowering blocks and other types of things are acceptable. Dialling out a shock is about as 'user adjustable' as changing any other suspension component lol. I wanted to have it signed off to dissuade HWP and RWC testers to state the suspension is legal to avoid having this discussion with them. The real problem is that Police and RWC/Pink/Blue slip people will say it needs engineering, and the engineers will state it doesn't need engineering. It is hugely irritating when aforementioned people get all "i know the rules mate feck off" when they don't, and the actual engineers are pleasant as all hell and do know the rules. Cars failing RWC for things that aren't listed in the RWC requirements is another thing here entirely!
    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
×
×
  • Create New...