Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

also selling my kit as i didn't want to remove my ross balancer.

Cameron have you finished with this project or are going to try and design another kit?
has anyone thought about using factory cas for start position then something off the crank or flywheel>

Hi Robert,

At this stage I am done with the kit however if anyone is wanting custom changes etc. I am happy to work with them to produce one offs etc.

I do not at this time have room for different blocks and rotating assemblies to work on different designs.

  • 5 weeks later...
  • 4 weeks later...

Long time, no reply and I'm sure this will likely only help a few people but here is what I did to solve the tomei oil pump interference and smaller diameter fluidampr issue. Modified Murrayis's mount, rotated the mount, added a cylindrical spacer, tapped the actual sensor and I'll be cutting notches in my crank balancer. I'm going to go with (12x) .300" wide x .300" long and about .100" deep. The sensor is based on changes in magnetic field and should still pick them up even though the notches won't be totally through. Range on the sensor is .018-.080" inch. My .100" or so shouldn't affect it. I don't want to have a belt have the chance of getting freyed on notches.

post-136202-0-40708300-1454289032_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-55908800-1454289058_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-64283800-1454289078_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-43377300-1454289098_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-37808500-1454289122_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-81909900-1454289141_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-48400800-1454289162_thumb.jpg

post-136202-0-48883900-1454289178_thumb.jpg

LOL...exactly. Trust me I felt bad grinding and chopping on such a nicely machined part, but hey it's working and feels totally solid. And I left my spacer short so I can shim under it and move the sensor closer to the crank pulley if needed after I really torque it on the crank.

  • 7 months later...

Hey guys just got my car tuned at horsepower solutions and wanted to share my results from this trigger kit. Brief description is its a r32 with fully built 2630 running a forced performance super 94 with all supporting mods. I used a ross balancer and trigger wheel with murrayis kit. Worked a treat with only thing to do is space it apart with shims. Below are some pics

20160522_113751.thumb.jpg.a82e467049f4d5167ec05871193ad2d4.jpg

20160516_193243.thumb.jpg.cb332520835c5625b6f532176fd62f62.jpg

20160424_104640.thumb.jpg.3a0aad1a0e744f964b1bc0477f75c68c.jpg

20160412_164559.thumb.jpg.f75bc517bac3dcc7434bb7c102cb1b86.jpg

20160831_173822.thumb.jpg.d2134200586f1558bde942c19b4d3039.jpg

20160522_113751.jpg

20160516_193243.jpg

20160424_104640.jpg

20160412_164559.jpg

20160831_173822.jpg

On 04/12/2015 at 9:36 PM, BlackBox said:

Hmm I really want to come up with a solution that doesn't require a gaping hole in the cover...

You can always just change to a custom made single window disc for the existing CAS instead of the the Murrayis cam trigger, that's what I'm doing.

 

You can always just change to a custom made single window disc for the existing CAS instead of the the Murrayis cam trigger, that's what I'm doing.

 



I've already got the kit and got my balancer machined and re-balanced.. I am going to get a timing cover 3d printed to suit what I need

The last one I got was about $80, but that was for a CA18. Autronic sell them so do NZ efi. Just don't connect the REF to the ECU and use the Sync off the exhaust cam.

http://www.nzefi.com/product/24-tooth-cam-angle-sensor-disk-nissan-sr20det-rwd/

 

Maybe Matt could write different code for the CAS.  The Nissan one is providing 360 degree slots plus the 5 or 6 on the other circle.  The code might be easily enough altered to expect an arbitrary number of pulses on either of those.  Or maybe it would be a horrible exercise.  I'm not too au fait with decompiling the code out of (anything really) these ECUs.

  • 1 month later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...