Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

One basic, step one thing when fitting new valve springs is checking installed height, pressure at seat and pressure at lift.

If these basic 101 things were done while the head was assembled, you should not have had a issue with valve float what so ever.

Shims can be added beween the head and spring, coil bind should have also been checked.

Cam makers give recomendations of these seat and lift specs.......

And get the instaled height and spring bind checked before starting the engine this time.

If the valvles are recessed from machining they will sit with too little pressure, shims need to be added under them to keep them within specs.

i know of a rb25 with performance springs and poncams made 580hp with manual and 520hp with auto, perfectly fine both around 25/26psi

I run a camtech 272 with lewis engines supplied springs and hydraulic lifters and they are fine at 24psi so far.

mind you i also had stock gear handling the power and boost also before cam upgrade.

hope this helps

  • 3 weeks later...

I have a similar setup as you have only im using a Wolf version 5 hypergear ss2 turbo and 660cc injectors and 98 pump fuel and getting 410hp at wheels with 15psi of boost when I go to high boost which is 19psi im getting 455hp at the wheels but I have std cams and my head was ported and flowed with heavier valve springs by Lewis Engines. I have a bit more lag than you but my tuner said it was to do with the slightly lower compression pistons 9.1.1 greddy manifold and the larger diameter primary tubes in the exhaust manifold but when the power comes on its a handfull. I wouldn't go heavier springs unless your going to go for solid lifters and cams as hydraulic setup doesn't really like too much valve spring tension you will wear out the top end of your motor. It might just be your tuner there are a lot of tuners out there that cant get the power out of a wolf computer.

  • 1 month later...

Hi guys

Thought you'd like to hear the results of the valve springs situation.

Changed out the performance springs for the supertech kit.

This was the only change and it went back on the dyno and the same place.

As you can see in the dyno graph the springs made a noticeable improvement.

Thanks to everyone for their input.post-12506-0-24816100-1427371399_thumb.jpg

  • 2 months later...

Hate to tell you but that statement makes absolutely no sense it's a spring for god sake it's there to control your valve shut it if it's the wrong tension spring select a better 1 it's that hard it's a spring

Edited by mr skidz

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...