Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Harro,

(please note, this is not a sponsored review and I do not have any affiliation with MCA)

So I did a quick search on SAU but there really isn't any proper discussion and/or review with MCA coilovers or specifically X-Series coilovers. Without being able to locate any reviews on the X-Series coilovers, I took the plunge and went straight into them and purchased the X-Race coilovers.

MCA says the X-Series coilovers are valved more aggressively than the MCA Blues which are destined more so for the everyday street weekend warrior, stanced up hard parked vehicles that generally want comfort and adjustability. Neither of the previous is what my R33 GTS-t is destined for, it's a track slart and a track slart it will remain.

Best time my car has ever achieved at Wakefield Park by my friend has been 1m12.7s for myself 1m13.5s - this is the benchmark!

post-22311-0-36889500-1446510588_thumb.jpg

So taking the product advertisement (as above).. I went on and purchased a set of MCA X-Race in 10kg front and 7kg rear springs, knowing that any softer for the track would result in undesired body roll, weight shift, etc.

post-22311-0-76697600-1446510845_thumb.jpg

I know this goes against all the information with other suspension gurus but I've tried those setups and cannot get the optimum handling performance I wanted (Whiteline 24mm ARBs, Bilstein Shocks, Lower Springs, Adjustable castor rods, Adjustable rear camber, HICAS eliminator). At Wakefield, the car would roll too much, the front would dip too much on hard braking and ultimately flicked the car around like a rag doll. Coming out of corners, the car would shift all of it's weight to one side (and front when braking heavily) which ended up sideways. I knew I needed stiffer spring rates to combat this.

So, the coilovers came and I installed them the same weekend they were delivered, so far so good.. very good build quality (however the brackets to hold brake lines looked to be universal and made to fit these coilovers, not a big deal - however if you look at BC ones they look nicer but this has nothing to do with the performance of the coilovers). They also appeared to be preadjusted in terms of height and also damper. I just installed them as is which resulted in the car looking a little wonky, the rear was heaps higher than the front but that could have been caused by the new harden subframe bushes I put in which sit a little different to the OEM product. I dropped the rear by 15mm which resulted in a more optimum height.

post-22311-0-92543100-1446511053_thumb.jpg

At the same time, I purchased the extenders, shorten them and let them poke through the parcel tray for ease of adjustment. Nearly looks cool LOL

post-22311-0-78411500-1446511092_thumb.jpg

Moment of truth......

Comfort: With dampers set to 4 Front and 6 Rear, the bumps and oscillations are absorbed very well. No bouncy feeling and actually very streetable. I would dare say the comfort is nearly the same as my previously Bilstein setup, of course when you hit a pothole or reflector on the road it will be more harsh than the Bilstein setup but I try to avoid hitting those things in general.

Comparison: I will compare these to BC BR in the standard 8kg/6kg flavour (unknown damper settings) the MCA X-Series in 10kg/7kg actually is more comfortable on the street.. even I was surprised, I was ready to smash my spine to bits on the street but I am also amazed and pleased with the shock's ability to articulate different bumps and dips in the road like the Bilstein shock did.

Street Handling: Not much has changed really, but then again at street speeds I can't really tell the difference as I run full semi-slicks on a daily basis (Nitto NT01) and also I'm not going fast enough to really benefit from the the coilovers.

Track Handling: TBA - have not gone yet, but will update this thread once I hit up Wakefield Park again.. might do a Speed off the Streets session before EOY.

More to come!!

  • Like 12

Properly dampened, you can run higher spring rates, which MCA seem to do.

Not X-series, but blues (or whichever is the cheapest one) in my mate's Evo7 (10kg springs from memory) rode almost stock-like comfort wise.

whats a parcel shelf still doing in a track car :P

a track car that is road registered because I don't have a tow car and space for a trailer where I live now :(

Johnny I'll be surprised if you aren't impressed with your purchase. The design engineering behind these shocks is punching well above the price point. I'm running MCA Red series with pretty good results. Track only. Setup/spec can vary but I'm thinking your rear spring rates are "up there".

Strongly suggest a call to MCA for ideas/recommendations on what's required to get the best out of your shocks. I have found their after sales service first class.

Keep us updated with your progress, but include more car detail. Wheel/tyre size and spec plus alignment. Bit of in-car when you go to Wakefield will tell heaps about how things are going.

  • Like 2

Quick run down of the car:

Front

  • Hardrace Front Castor Rods,
  • Whiteline Steering rack bushes
  • 24mm Whiteline ARB set at 2nd softest

Rear

  • Hardrace Rear Camber arms set at -1.5 degrees
  • Hardrace harden subframe bushes
  • 24mm Whiteline ARB set at stiffest
  • eBay Special HICAS Eliminator kit

Alignment

  • Front Toe: 1.5mm toe out each side, total 3mm
  • Front Camber: -2 degrees ish (will be more now because lowered car after alignment and no adjustment)
  • Front Castor: 8.5 degrees
  • Rear Toe: 1mm toe in each side, total 2mm
  • Rear Camber: -1.5 degrees

Wheels/Tyres/Brakes:

  • R33 GT-R 17x9 +30
  • Nitto NT01 255/40/17 all round
  • Project Mu HC800+ all round on stock calipers, stock rotors

We are running a set of the "basic spec" MCA Blue in an Evo.

Street running was remarkably better ride control. On the track it was also better controlled and the car was faster.

If you spec-up, you should get incrementally better results.

Quick run down of the car:

Front

  • Hardrace Front Castor Rods,
  • Whiteline Steering rack bushes
  • 24mm Whiteline ARB set at 2nd softest
Rear
  • Hardrace Rear Camber arms set at -1.5 degrees
  • Hardrace harden subframe bushes
  • 24mm Whiteline ARB set at stiffest
  • eBay Special HICAS Eliminator kit
Alignment
  • Front Toe: 1.5mm toe out each side, total 3mm
  • Front Camber: -2 degrees ish (will be more now because lowered car after alignment and no adjustment)
  • Front Castor: 8.5 degrees
  • Rear Toe: 1mm toe in each side, total 2mm
  • Rear Camber: -1.5 degrees
Wheels/Tyres/Brakes:
  • R33 GT-R 17x9 +30
  • Nitto NT01 255/40/17 all round
  • Project Mu HC800+ all round on stock calipers, stock rotors

Johnny it looks like you've got the right sort of combinations to make a good thing. Couple of questions and suggestions:

What ride height are you running? Long time ago Sydneykid posted up suggested ride height range that works ok with R chassis cars. It doesn't take too much of a drop from stock in the rear to start inducing bump steer and nasty taily tendencies because as the suspension compresses the rear tyres toe out.

Rear camber will only increase as the suspension compresses. Gives less contact patch and grip. Maybe look to stand the tyre up more square, target 0.5 - 0.75 neg.

Front camber if you're track only could be increased. Tyres flogging out on the outside edge (if that's happening for you?) might be a telltale to give it more.

I actually have the car a little lower than what SK recommends, purely for aesthetic reasons - however the control arms aren't pointing skywards and actually are parallel to the ground.

In terms of rear camber, even at -1.5degree I am getting outter edge wear and tear on the track. The rear tyres are more thrashed on the outer edges rather than the inner as most may think.

I am considering even going to -2 degrees

I don't have any issues with traction though, putting over 500nm & 320+ kW to the rears on the 255 NT01 tyres

Went for a drive in a forry with mca golds which is setup for rally. Thing was amazing! Soaked up speed humps and table tops like it was a flat road. Had a little bit of a top heavy feeling as you get with any wagon, but still felt very flat through the corners.

Had no idea suspension could be so extremely versatile.

I have mca blues and they a great job.

Tossing up mca blues or the x-c's, it's a daily but I want to get into some minor track work as well.

Josh recommended 8/3.5 wether I go for the blues or xc's but the rear sounds a bit soft? What do you guys think? (For a r32 gtst).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I seem to the be only person that is using a Haltech 2500 on an NA motor, I've installed a Bosch DBW throttle body to the OEM intake manifold and am having problems maintaining AFR even with the wideband o2.  It will run extremely rich at idle and up to redline, but under load it will go extremely lean in the 20s and i'm essentially having to rev it over 4k and feather the clutch to get it up to speed.  I've read a few other threads of about the butterfly, it seems removing the vacuum to it is supposed to have it remain open, i've noticed no difference under 4k with the vacuum line to it plugged.  I'm hoping someone here has had luck using the NA manifold with Haltech, and if they happen to have a tune for it.  
    • I don't know any details, but I really wouldn't be surprised if they do it as a LHD only version, at least initially.
    • Thanks for the replies everyone. Definitely a coolant push. Oil catch can is empty and always has been. As the engine is out now I'll be having a good look over things. I do have some detonation on the piston tops from a trigger issue back about 5 years ago. I felt it and shut off then bought a new ecu and changed the trigger. Never been an issue since. It never hurt the power, its made almost 80hp more since that incident but I will pull the bearing caps to take a look. If the bearings are damaged I will do a bottom end refresh. Head is being re conditioned at the moment and the block will be cleaned and checked to ensure it's flat. I'll go with a kameari gasket and see how it ends up. The other thing I'm not super keen on is the cylinder colours. I suspect this is from the inlet manifold. The plan will be to put it back together, retune and then stick a plazmaman billet inlet on it and retune. I'm happy with the power, if it makes a little more, then great, but I would rather just make everything more efficient at this stage.
    • Maybe they'll look to do a bunch of presales to help inject some cash fast for their financial issues...
    • Does it also misfire equally when revving?   Josh is very correct in what you should do. The coilpack harness wiring loom itself is a known problem due to its age and the number of heat cycles it has gone through. Throwing parts at a vehicle to diagnose the issue isn't a smart or good way to do it. Secondly, you may have a bad coil pack, you pop replacements in, they fix that issue, but messing with the harness breaks it, so the issue persists. So now you think "well it wasn't the coil packs" and have to continue chasing your tail, potentially swapping back in your shit coil packs and returning the good ones (yes, I've seen people do this because 'it wasn't the problem' and they want to save money). And suddenly, you've got two issues with the same symptoms...   Diagnose, don't use the spare parts shotgun.
×
×
  • Create New...