Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

The engine in my '32 GTR is in need of a rebuild and i've decided to go all out on it (all the goodies, stroker and the like), one of the thing's i've been considering is VCT.

Option 1 for installing VCT would be to grab the kit from Otomoto, which is 3K, plus the required NEO bits, which is around another 650 by all accounts, give or take. Given this is a rebuild most of the other work required would have been done anyway so not really an extra cost there.

However, i've had some suggestions from around the place that perhaps I should buy a Rb25 NEO and swap the heads over. I've not heard of anyone do this, and there would be a number of things to sort out but it may work out significantly cheaper in the end, however there are some things that i'm struggling to get my head around.

From what I understand, the main things that would need to be sorted.

  • Exhaust: i'd be keeping my twin turbo setup, so cylinder 2 and 5 need to be changed, this would best be done by drill+tapping new holes in the head, correct?
  • Cam covers: swap over all my 26 stuff, does it all bolt on? Obviously the timing belt cover would need some adjustments, have some ideas with that.
  • VCT oil feed. As i understand this, the 26 block would have the same issues as doing a VCT on a 30 block so i could use the solutions used there, which is an external feed as i understand it, however i've also seen some info on people drilling oil feeds into their 30 blocks to avoid needing an external oil feed for the VCT. Am I barking up a good tree here?
  • Headstuds: I understand RB26 ones are larger, so this would just require re-drilling the holes on the NEO head?
  • Intake: this is the big one. I would want to keep the ITB's, so this would require welding a new inner runner section using the existing runner to NEO flange and with the runner to TB flange from the 26 on the other end, keeping a similar length and all the water lines etc. I've talked to a fabricator who believes he can do it but any advice/experience here would be helpful. Obviously the main issue would be to keep the length in check as i can't afford to have the plenum space out any further.

Is there anything else am I missing here?

I understand that the NEO head has some design revisions, eg larger exhaust valves from factory, hopefully these would be a net positive to the engine also, is there anything else there which may come into play, eg changes with oil return? Obviously the head will be refreshed and cleaned up with new valve springs etc, and possibly some cams, but this is something that would happen with either head.

Why am I trying to do this? Well, the net cost to me from getting the neo, offloading the bottom end and other ancillaries and the 26 head would probably be 1000 bucks, so even if the extra fabrication and machining work to set it all up is 1-2000 i'm coming out ahead compared to the Ottomoto kit, which is nice.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/
Share on other sites

Hnm, a lot of people rave about vct. I'll try and drive a mates car with vct on then off soon.

obviously that's a bit different to a car with properly dialed in cam gears but i'd be getting adjustable gears for the vct head anyway so that may be a moot point, its more about the difference the vct would make, particularly to transient response.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640176
Share on other sites

It's not fair to do the comparison with it enabled and disabled. An engine that is intended to not have VCT will more than likely have fixed valve timing part way between the advanced and retarded positions that the VCT will give. Having VCT enabled means that the engine will feel better at both the top end and bottom end than the engine that doesn't have VCT. Having VCT disabled will make that engine feel better than the non VCT engine at one end of the rev range, and much worse at the other.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640186
Share on other sites

You can usually only put an adjustable cam gear on the exhaust of a VCT head. It is possible to adjust the inlet side but a lot of stuffing around and generally not worth it on an RB25 - no idea what it would be like on a 26.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640197
Share on other sites

I've seen an adjustable gear that has been made up that is pretty easy to adjust, only in the last few months, would more than likely be grabbing one of those.

It's not fair to do the comparison with it enabled and disabled. An engine that is intended to not have VCT will more than likely have fixed valve timing part way between the advanced and retarded positions that the VCT will give. Having VCT enabled means that the engine will feel better at both the top end and bottom end than the engine that doesn't have VCT. Having VCT disabled will make that engine feel better than the non VCT engine at one end of the rev range, and much worse at the other.

Yes you're right, at least it might get me an idea of the difference it would make

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640206
Share on other sites

I believe Ben with a Stagea on here makes adjustable gears for the VCT

My idea of doing it on a dyno is it should/will clearly show any gains top or bottom end

The reason I am not convinced of just VCT especially only on intake is to the best of my knowledge the adjustment goes from one end of the adjuster to the other end which could very well go past the optimal cam angles for top or bottom end power when a fixed set cam in between the different optimal angles may just give a good as or even better result then VCT

Or even good enough to justify not spending $3500-$4500 to fit VCT to one cam

Getting a VE setup on the other hand would be tits

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640258
Share on other sites

what sort of HP are you planning on running? a set of aftermarket cams with adjustable gears "properly" dialed in will probably give you what your after without spending so much$$$$ for very little, if any, gains.

you cant compare a car tuned with vct by just disconnecting it and seeing the difference as you will definitely feel the difference as its set up to run vct!

very hard to compare as every car will "feel" different and react different on the road

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7640469
Share on other sites

Ignoring the discussion on the merit of vct, does anyone have any comments or insight about the actual process of mating the NEO head to the 26 block?

From what I understand, the main things that would need to be sorted.

  • Exhaust: i'd be keeping my twin turbo setup, so cylinder 2 and 5 need to be changed, this would best be done by drill+tapping new holes in the head, correct?
  • Cam covers: swap over all my 26 stuff, does it all bolt on? Obviously the timing belt cover would need some adjustments, have some ideas with that.
  • VCT oil feed. As i understand this, the 26 block would have the same issues as doing a VCT on a 30 block so i could use the solutions used there, which is an external feed as i understand it, however i've also seen some info on people drilling oil feeds into their 30 blocks to avoid needing an external oil feed for the VCT. Am I barking up a good tree here?
  • Headstuds: I understand RB26 ones are larger, so this would just require re-drilling the holes on the NEO head?
  • Intake: this is the big one. I would want to keep the ITB's, so this would require welding a new inner runner section using the existing runner to NEO flange and with the runner to TB flange from the 26 on the other end, keeping a similar length and all the water lines etc. I've talked to a fabricator who believes he can do it but any advice/experience here would be helpful. Obviously the main issue would be to keep the length in check as i can't afford to have the plenum space out any further.

Is there anything else am I missing here?

I understand that the NEO head has some design revisions, eg larger exhaust valves from factory, hopefully these would be a net positive to the engine also, is there anything else there which may come into play, eg changes with oil return? Obviously the head will be refreshed and cleaned up with new valve springs etc, and possibly some cams, but this is something that would happen with either head.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7641473
Share on other sites

I'm looking at doing the same thing when I get off my arse. I'm looking at putting the vct straight onto the rb26 head. Using rb25 neo IN cam and vct. I've drawn up a little external solenoid housing that would eliminate the need for it to mount in the head as rb25 neo does.

The oil to the vct will replicate the rb25 neo. I've already moved the cam journal lube hole to the side just like the 25 neo, all that's left is to mount a compression fitting atop #1 IN cam cap to feed the vct cam gallery. 3/16 copper pipe can snake to the back of the head using mounting tabs on the cap bolts and it could exit via a hole through the rubber half moon.

With how much difference there is with the rb25 neo vct on and off surely there are similar gains to be had with the 26.

If you can afford it go V-cam.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7644429
Share on other sites

NEO head, do it. More and more are doing it - for good reason. Or go V-CAM... There is someone making a V-CAM without the HKS price, for the life of me I cannot remember who it is though.

Pete - I can't confirm most of your points except intake. Just get a NEO / ITB throttle plate adapter. There are people that make them, I think like $800 - job done and it's bolt on.

Just shave some material off the plenum you're installing and you're off and running. Even the plate itself - depending on how many mm you need.

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/461107-rb26-neo/#findComment-7645843
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...