Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

How is this set up for you?

Yep I'm happy with it, it feels controlled and predictable on the track and compliant enough on the street.

I ran the same coilover+swaybar setup with softer 6kg/5kg springs in street use only originally. It was great but once I took it to the track it was a bit rolly in the corners so decided to go stiffers springs - the BC's normally come with 8/6. Surprisingly there wasn't much difference in ride quality really .

One thing to note about the ARC swaybars is that AFAIK they are hollow whereas the OEMs are solid, so the difference in stiffness is not quite as radical as it might look based on the diameter.

Yoshii, we can't tell you what sizes to get.

The ARBs affect the balance of the car (under-over steer balance that is). How much you need at the front and rear depends on the inherent balance from your actual springs and dampers, coupled with your own preference. If oversteer frightens you then you would be well advised to keep the rear bar smaller than the front. But if perchance you have much stiffer front springs than your rear, then the same size ARBs at both ends might still be non-oversteery. Impossible to advise you precisely.

I have 24mm adjustables at both ends. Front set to hard, rear set to soft. That's pretty stiff, although it is possible to go a fair bit stiffer. The front stiffness aids turn in response, but does reduce grip in the wet! The rear stiffness tends to make my car quite willing to get the tail out. This is with 5+kg springs at the front and 3ish kg at the rear, with SK modified Bilstein B6s.

How are you getting such low spring rates? Most of the coilovers I find in Japan for the car has a minimal of 8 for the front and 6 for the rear.

As above the both sides situation

This is for track in r32 gtst

Ive always been in camp 2 - 8kg Front 6 rear with 27mm front sway and 24 mm rear sway - then moved to 7kg front and 4kg rear with same larger sways

now.... tomorrow is my first trial in Camp 1... 11kg front with 5kg rear and back to standard sways - cant say im not nervous about it but hey MCA do know what they are talking about so I'll listen... for now

How are you getting such low spring rates? Most of the coilovers I find in Japan for the car has a minimal of 8 for the front and 6 for the rear.

And on top of that....it is possible to buy pretty much any spring you want to suit a coilover. 200mm free length? No problem. 230? Yup. 260? Sure! 2kg/mm? Certainly, Sir. 14 kg/mm? Yes, would you like it painted yellow or blue?

  • Like 1

Im running the whiteline BNK010 kit on my r34 and the car is so much better than just having coilovers, no body roll and the car feel really direct and sharp. I'm pretty sure the kit is a 24mm front with 22mm rear.

Yep I'm happy with it, it feels controlled and predictable on the track and compliant enough on the street.

I ran the same coilover+swaybar setup with softer 6kg/5kg springs in street use only originally. It was great but once I took it to the track it was a bit rolly in the corners so decided to go stiffers springs - the BC's normally come with 8/6. Surprisingly there wasn't much difference in ride quality really .

One thing to note about the ARC swaybars is that AFAIK they are hollow whereas the OEMs are solid, so the difference in stiffness is not quite as radical as it might look based on the diameter.

OEM are hollow.

Hollow is a plus in that the bar will be lighter than an equivalently stiff solid bar. Bigger diameter, but lighter.

Stiffness is a function of the 4th power of diameter. So the bit of steel near the centre of the bar does relatively nothing for stiffness compared to the bit of steel out near the edge. So if you can make it hollow it will be lighter. If you make it solid at the same diameter as the hollow bar, it will be a little stiffer. Most aftermarket crowds don't make hollow bars because it is harder to get the raw stock and they are more difficult to form.

  • Like 1

Hollow is a plus in that the bar will be lighter than an equivalently stiff solid bar. Bigger diameter, but lighter.

Stiffness is a function of the 4th power of diameter. So the bit of steel near the centre of the bar does relatively nothing for stiffness compared to the bit of steel out near the edge. So if you can make it hollow it will be lighter. If you make it solid at the same diameter as the hollow bar, it will be a little stiffer. Most aftermarket crowds don't make hollow bars because it is harder to get the raw stock and they are more difficult to form.

Spot on. That's why I jumped on the ARCs, rare items.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Version 1 aluminium airbox is.......not acceptable No pics as I "didn't like the look.....alot" Even after all my "CAD", and measurements, the leg near the fusebox just didn't sit right as it ended up about 10mm long and made the angle of the dangle look wrong, the height was a little short as well, meh, I wasn't that confident that Version 1 was going to be an instant winner I might give Version 2 another go, there's plenty of aluminium at work, but, after having in on and off a few times, and laying in the old OEM airbox without the new pod filter and MAF, there may be an option to modify the OEM air box and still use the Autoexe front cover and filter.... maybe This >  Needs to fit in here, but using the panel, and not the pod, the MAF will need to fit in the airbox though> I'm thinking as the old OEM box and Autoexe cover that is sitting in the shed is just sitting around doing nothing, and they are relatively abundant and cheap to replace if I mess it up and need another, it may well fit with some modifications to how the Autoexe brackets mounts to the rad support, and some dremiling to move it get in there, should give me some more room for activities, as I don't want to move the MAF and affect the tune Sealing the hole it requires to stick it in the air box is simple, a tight fit and some pinch weld will seal it up tight  I am calling this a later problem though
    • and it ends up being already priced in as though you're just on 91RON without any ethanol. Car will lose a bit of economy as the short and long term fuel trims bring down the AFR back to stoich or whatever it is for cruise/idle for the engine.  
    • Oh, you are right. But, in Australia E10 is based on 91RON fuel and ends up being 94RON. Hence it being the cheaper option for economy cars. The more performance oriented cars go for the 98RON fuel that has no ethanol mixed in. The only step up we have left then at some petrol stations is E85.
    • There is a warning that "this thread is super old" but they ignore that anyway...
    • With 10% Ethanol, we're talking 2-3% fuel consumption difference. The emissions reductions and octane boost in my opinion far outweigh this almost non existent loss.    My tanks sitting at 80%. Luckily that should go down fast as I'm on vacation again for the next two weeks. 
×
×
  • Create New...