Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

My soarer is loud as f**k with its 3.5" system

Has a big hooker aerochamber at the back and a custom mid muffler (its small cause f**k all room with a 3.5" pipe)

What mufflers are you guys using on the quieter systems?

4" dump, 3.5" cat, 3.5" mid muffler, 3.5" massive 18x12x6 rear muffler.

Both just off the shelf straight through glass packs from an exhaust shop, did a little shy of 400kw just fine on a 35r years ago, dyno sheets somewhere in the rb30 threads I believe.

Low frequency components (~120Hz) seem to be the main frequencies transmitted into the cabin and the source of exhaust drone. An uninterrupted exhaust diameter from front to back (think 3" straight through) seems to be prone to resonances around low frequencies. The only way to break up the low frequency resonance is to make the length of the constant 3" section shorter. The way of doing this is by changing the exhaust diameter in the middle with a full size centre muffler. This is why basically every quiet exhaust has a full size centre muffler. A hotdog resonator in the middle won't do much, they are too small to change the pipe tuning.

I had a Fujitsubo catback in my R33 and it had full size centre and rear mufflers, very quiet system. I'm about to buy something very similar for my R34.

Mine is 3.5 to the back of the cat and 3 through two large strait through mufflers to atmosphere .

One thing you can do is to put a "soft" part in the system to isolate engine vibration from the exhaust system . Most of you would have seen those spring loaded carbon ring and cup joints many transverse front wheel drive cars have . Because the across car engine rocks back and forth under acceleration (torque reaction) the exhaust can't be rigid or it'll act as a tie bar .

This clever joint allows engine movement whilst staying sealed , it also isolates to a degree engine noise and vibration .

Big diameter tube is very rigid and tents to transmit lots of vibration and noise into your cabin . I got my one off exhaust fitted with one of these spring loaded cup joints behind the cat and roughly where the gearbox exhaust hanger is . That way the front of the exhaust system is supported the length of the rigid engine and gearbox but allows movement south of there .

A bit of mucking around but it does work .

A .

Mine is 3.5 to the back of the cat and 3 through two large strait through mufflers to atmosphere .

One thing you can do is to put a "soft" part in the system to isolate engine vibration from the exhaust system . Most of you would have seen those spring loaded carbon ring and cup joints many transverse front wheel drive cars have . Because the across car engine rocks back and forth under acceleration (torque reaction) the exhaust can't be rigid or it'll act as a tie bar .

This clever joint allows engine movement whilst staying sealed , it also isolates to a degree engine noise and vibration .

Big diameter tube is very rigid and tents to transmit lots of vibration and noise into your cabin . I got my one off exhaust fitted with one of these spring loaded cup joints behind the cat and roughly where the gearbox exhaust hanger is . That way the front of the exhaust system is supported the length of the rigid engine and gearbox but allows movement south of there .

A bit of mucking around but it does work .

A .

Is it the same as a normal flex joint?

Noise reduction is more important than ever with the laws being the way they are , which is why standard cars now sound like vacuum cleaners .

That "soft joint" also takes a lot of load off your turbine housings bolts/studs and very likely the manifold itself .

A .

No they are actually better things than the bellows type ones with the braided wire outer covering . The braided ones don't like really high temps and the word on the street is that they expand inwards creating flow restrictions .

With the spring loaded "cup" joints the only things that can fail are the carbon ring or the two bolts and springs but I've never seen the fasteners or springs give up . The other thing is that they are really simple to take apart and the usually the only consumable part is that carbon ring - which if in fair condition goes straight back in .

I had to insist the exhaust place that made my system fit one but it was well worth it . Truck exhausts sometimes use these kind of joints so big bore parts shouldn't be hard to get . Some better exhaust places may even have the press dies to make them .

The obnoxious hum/buzz/drone in aftermarket exhausts is often the exhaust pipe and mufflers vibrating/resonating particularly if the engines torque reaction is being restricted by 3 or 4 metres of big bore tube . The engine and gearbox mounts are there to dampen engine/trans NVH , but hang a long rigid tube off something solid like a manifold and or a turbo and you can expect noise and vibration issues .

My old Subaru RX Turbo had a 3" dump pipe and 2 1/2" behind the middle muffler , think 1800cc flat four with small port prehistoric heads and a little GT2554R turbocharger . In legal rally trim (Grp A cams/pistons/computer/exhaust) these engines put out a great snappin 190 hp at the flywheel .

Really that exhaust was too big for what I was doing but with straight through mufflers and one of these joints in the factory position it was NOT noisy - at all .

I'm not saying that these joints are a magic bullet but together with big can area straight through mufflers (no baffles) you can have an exhaust that doesn't wake the dead or irritate your cars passengers .

A .

  • Like 1

How much can the "cup" joints flex/move ? Wondering if they could be used to help line up segments of the exhaust ( making home made exhaust here.. lol )

Anyone used this style flexi joint part? post-70965-0-07561700-1466814319_thumb.jpg

Edited by AngryRB

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • GCG is a good company, they're a major distributor for Garrett in Japan as well.
    • Nah, OEM washer bottle and brake fluid reservoirs are fine I don't know what it is with the plastic that Mazda used, some plastics, like the washer bottle and brake fluid res are fine, and still look new after 20 years use, where as the coolant expansion tank, and PS reservoir, that I replaced with new OEM items when I first got the car, turned yellow and started getting brittle a few years later If the dirty yellow stained plastics didn't trigger me there wouldn't be an issue, but they did, much like the battery bracket....... Meh As for going back to work full time to support car stuff, nope, why, because I own a Mazda NC MX5, not a Nissan R series Skyline 🤣
    • I've never heard of CJ-motor, so can't advise you on them. I'd just go straight to GCG for a GCG highflow though. Seems no point to use a middleman. I'm somewhat surprised that the price on the CJ site is lower than the GCG retail price. Even though CJ would get a discount of some sort, you would hardly expect them to give up so much margin. Maybe the price is out of date? Having said that "I'd go to GCG"...when I did my highflow, I went to Hypergear. I did this https://hypergearturbos.com/product/rb25dethighflow/#tab-dyno-results with the R34 OP6 450HP profile. With the BB centre (extra $400) and intially with the standard boost actuator, but I eventually got him to send me the high pressure one when I got to the point of being able to actually use it. Ends up costing the same sort of money as the GCG highflow, but this is, of course, the turbo that I KNOW has a shorter length core and so moves the comp cover rearwards. The GCG apparently doesn't do that. My mechanic also swears by the GCG highflow, given that we have another turbo rebuilder who does something essentialy the same as theirs, using Garrett wheels. He says it stands up at really low revs and makes good power. I haven't pushed my HG highflow past ~240-250rwkW yet (should have a little more in it, but unclear how much) and it does have a fairly gentle boost ramp. OK, it's much better now that I have gotten my boost controller tuned up on it.  A lot of my earlier unhappiness was because I couldn't keep the wastegate flap as closed as it needed to be (including some mechanical issues). I'd still prefer it to boost up nearly as quickly as the stocker, and it certainly a bit slower than that. So maybe the GCG one is worth the first look (for you).
    • Ok thanks 🙂 I will higly consider this. Any "known" company for a good reviews and experience to send that off? Is that CJ-motor good one? Or go straight to GCG site? I need to use VPN to even find some of those "shops" let alone access them 🙂 
    • You can literally put in as much WMI as it takes to quench the combustion totally (and then back it off a little, obviously), and it will keep making more and more power. The power comes from the cooling effect of the water (and the meth) and the extra fuel (the meth, which also has massive octane). It is effectively exactly like running E85. One might be slightly better than the other, but they are damn close. But with either you can lean on the boost or the timing (or both) waaaay more than with just petrol and the results are similar. Here's the first thing I googled for an anecdotal bit of evidence. Can't access the attachment without being a gold member, but it is there for the getting if able to, or searched up elsewise perhaps. https://www.hpacademy.com/forum/general-tuning-discussion/show/wmi-vs-e85/
×
×
  • Create New...