Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Idle is basically same you cant really tell cams have been changed. Performance wise when I put them in 6years ago on 98 it made gains in the mid and 10kw up top and response remained the same. 

  • Like 1
2 minutes ago, boostn0199 said:

Idle is basically same you cant really tell cams have been changed. Performance wise when I put them in 6years ago on 98 it made gains in the mid and 10kw up top and response remained the same. 

you can force it to brap a little, as I've explained earlier :)

nothing braps as good as a set of 272+ lol

From Tomei USA .

R33 RB25DE(T) Early .

Inlet   8-68 so 8+68+180=256 , Lobe center 120 deg .

Cam actuator pressurised I assume 28-48 .

Exh 63-13 so 13+63+180=256 , Lobe center 115 deg .

The way most people look at the figures its 8-68 63-13 , or (I'm assuming)  28-48 63-13 cam actuator pressurised . 

Overlap 8+13=21 degrees .

Cam actuator pressurised I assume overlap timing is 28+13=41 degrees , so not surprised ole 25 won't idle in this state .

 

A .

 

 

 

 

So if you go off tomei's advertised duration at 1mm of lift which is 220deg for both inlet and exh and using a 115deg lsa.

 

My calculator says

 

Camshaft Calculations - Lobe Center / Duration

Your Tomei 256 has an Overlap of -5.00 degrees and has in Intake Duration of 220.00 degrees. The Exhaust Duration is 230.00 degrees. Your Lobe Separation Angle is 115.00 degrees. The Inlet Cam has an Installed Centerline of 120.00 degrees ATDC. The exhaust cam has an Installed Centerline of 110.00 degrees BTDC.

 

So no overlap at all. Infact both valves are closed for 5 degs of crank rotation

End of the day, they can  be a handy improvement to "whole of engine package" - with a few riders.

Not much point under the 300rwkW mark - change turbo spec and/or add boost.  Or change fuels if not on E85 (and yes we know you are on some home brew Adrian).

Expect some change to idle sound, but no real change to idle quality.  You can/would play with the fuelling and ignition in a couple of cells depending on what you want to achieve in that area

Possibly a small lift in useable rpm ceiling before it noses over, and slightly softer down low.

Probably an increase in fuel consumption - if this grind gives some increased overlap over OEM for scavenging then that's to be expected.

For road use only, and if you're hell bent on best fuel economy, not much point.  But it's kinda fun to play a bit and see for yourself.  Worst case scenario, go back to stock cams for a known quantity if you're not happy.

 

 

50/50 E70/P98 - E35 . 

Problems atm confirmed this afternoon - leaking exhaust valves on no2 and when cams come out will see if it has bucket issues or valve/seat probs . Hoping in a way that head comes off tomorrow so top end can be freshened up . This 163K/20 yr old RB25 breathes absolutely zip when running with filler cap off so bottom end should be good . 5 of the 6 plugs looked mint though no so much on 2 . The opportunity exists to refit the standard cams and Id be interested to hear what Stao thinks of std vs Poncams in a 33 spec 25DET . Will probably leave the Tomeis in because a few things like better turbo and injectors have changed since those cams went in - 70K back .

I don't know how long the valve issue has been there and probably blamed some of its antics on the larger side feeds I ran before the ID750s went in . Car ran like a dog today with a weak stalling idle made worse by using AC and headlights (defog in heavy rain) .

Will know more tomorrow cheers  A . 

 

Did everything possible brain wise , derivative gain/proportional gain/anti stall gain all maxed . Mucked around with stepper base position and idle screw and all the conditions to do with closed loop idle and idle ignition timing . 

This is a mechanical issue and when fixed should make the tuning part much easier .

 

I didn't really feel any difference, but I changed my turbo to a high flow at the same time so was hard to tell. But standard cams are often set up for pollution control so are generally softer for a longer burn. The 256 cams are probably what Nissan would have wanted to use if ADR's etc didn't dictate otherwise.

  • Like 1

Bit more of the puzzle .

Turns out that head and cams was done for me 8 yrs ago , one I bought 2nd hand off Wolverine . Was ported and fitted with Ferrea OS exhaust valves and wire rings fitted in grooves in the heads deck just behind the gaskets fire rings . Also got 33 Poncams and head decked for a 9.2-9.3 static CR .

Once removed and stripped the problem was found to be worn exhaust valve guides some quite badly . Obviously the inconsistent issue was exhaust valves sometimes lining up with their seats and sometimes not . Obviously when they didn't decent running went out the window along with erratic idle speed and quality .

So all exhaust guides replaced and all seats and valves resurfaced , spring heights and tensions reset . Heads deck is perfect and will go with a new genuine Nissan head gasket , actually all genuine gaskets and seals . Manifolds were port matched last time .

This time around going with Sydneykids recommendation to retard the exhaust Poncam 2 degrees . They found in their day that this gave a little more power and fractionally more boost at around 3200 revs fine tuned on the dyno . My engine builder doesn't like aftermarket cam pulleys so they are going to set the crank pulley to 2 degrees and alter the std exhaust cam pulley to allow it to line up with the std marks - basically 0-2 adjustment and can't damage anything if it moves .

With luck it'll be together and running tomorrow so I can redo all the idle and cold start stuff and retune all the light load low to medium speed ranges . Then it will be going back to Scott at Insight and quite likely be final tuned on straight 98 ULP . For how I drive these days I don't think I'll need the ethanol any more .

If I ever do another RB the plan would be an RB30 with an RB25 Neo turbo head for the valve train updates . Anyone got a complete standard Neo top end in good nick for sale ?

More soon , cheers A .

 

     

Hardly , if it was being sold which it isn't they'd be told the story and if all else failed to fit a std pulley . If they were smart they'd find a way to mark the cam and pulley before disassembly so they could get it right . The way it is now if it moved it fails safe - provided it didn't spit the bolts out . Personally I think setting the crank where you want it (+2deg) and having the cam lined up on the std mark is way to go but to each their own . Also this engine has new belt bearings seals and water pump so shouldn't be coming apart any time soon . 

Have to get if back to Insight for tuning probably with a better fuel pump and maybe a bit higher base pressure for those EV14 injectors .

Hunt will be on for Neo head and a decent tall short block .   

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Who did you have do the installation? I actually know someone who is VERY familiar with the AVS gear. The main point of contact though would be your installer.   Where are you based in NZ?
    • Look, realistically, those are some fairly chunky connectors and wires so it is a reasonably fair bet that that loom was involved in the redirection of the fuel pump and/or ECU/ignition power for the immobiliser. It's also fair to be that the new immobiliser is essentially the same thing as the old one, and so it probably needs the same stuff done to make it do what it has to do. Given that you are talking about a car that no-one else here is familiar with (I mean your exact car) and an alarm that I've never heard of before and so probably not many others are familiar with, and that some wire monkey has been messing with it out of our sight, it seems reasonable that the wire monkey should be fixing this.
    • Wheel alignment immediately. Not "when I get around to it". And further to what Duncan said - you cannot just put camber arms on and shorten them. You will introduce bump steer far in excess of what the car had with stock arms. You need adjustable tension arms and they need to be shortened also. The simplest approach is to shorten them the same % as the stock ones. This will not be correct or optimal, but it will be better than any other guess. The correct way to set the lengths of both arms is to use a properly built/set up bump steer gauge and trial and error the adjustments until you hit the camber you need and want and have minimum bump steer in the range of motion that the wheel is expected to travel. And what Duncan said about toe is also very true. And you cannot change the camber arm without also affecting toe. So when you have adjustable arms on the back of a Skyline, the car either needs to go to a talented wheel aligner (not your local tyre shop dropout), or you need to be able to do this stuff yourself at home. Guess which approach I have taken? I have built my own gear for camber, toe and bump steer measurement and I do all this on the flattest bit of concrete I have, with some shims under the tyres on one side to level the car.
    • Thought I would get some advice from others on this situation.    Relevant info: R33 GTS25t Link G4x ECU Walbro 255LPH w/ OEM FP Relay (No relay mod) Scenario: I accidentally messed up my old AVS S5 (rev.1) at the start of the year and the cars been immobilised. Also the siren BBU has completely failed; so I decided to upgrade it.  I got a newer AVS S5 (rev.2?) installed on Friday. The guy removed the old one and its immobilisers. Tried to start it; the car cranks but doesnt start.  The new one was installed and all the alarm functions seem to be working as they should; still wouldn't start Went to bed; got up on Friday morning and decided to have a look into the no start problem. Found the car completely dead.  Charged the battery; plugged it back in and found the brake lights were stuck on.  Unplugging the brake pedal switch the lights turn off. Plug it back in and theyre stuck on again. I tested the switch (continuity test and resistance); all looks good (0-1kohm).  On talking to AVS; found its because of the rubber stopper on the brake pedal; sure enough the middle of it is missing so have ordered a new one. One of those wear items; which was confusing what was going on However when I try unplugging the STOP Light fuses (under the dash and under the hood) the brake light still stays on. Should those fuses not cut the brake light circuit?  I then checked the ECU; FP Speed Error.  Testing the pump again; I can hear the relay clicking every time I switch it to ON. I unplugged the pump and put the multimeter across the plug. No continuity; im seeing 0.6V (ECU signal?) and when it switches the relay I think its like 20mA or 200mA). Not seeing 12.4V / 7-9A. As far as I know; the Fuel Pump was wired through one of the immobiliser relays on the old alarm.  He pulled some thick gauged harness out with the old alarm wiring; which looks to me like it was to bridge connections into the immobilisers? Before it got immobilised it was running just fine.  Im at a loss to why the FP is getting no voltage; I thought maybe the FP was faulty (even though I havent even done 50km on the new pump) but no voltage at the harness plug.  Questions: Could it be he didnt reconnect the fuel pump when testing it after the old alarm removal (before installing the new alarm)?  Is this a case of bridging to the brake lights instead of the fuel pump circuit? It's a bit beyond me as I dont do a lot with electrical; so have tried my best to diagnose what I think seems to make sense.  Seeking advice if theres for sure an issue with the alarm install to get him back here; or if I do infact, need an auto electrician to diagnose it. 
    • Then, shorten them by 1cm, drop the car back down and have a visual look (or even better, use a spirit level across the wheel to see if you have less camber than before. You still want something like 1.5 for road use. Alternatively, if you have adjustable rear ride height (I assume you do if you have extreme camber wear), raise the suspension back to standard height until you can get it all aligned properly. Finally, keep in mind that wear on the inside of the tyre can be for incorrect toe, not just camber
×
×
  • Create New...