Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, Full-Race Geoff said:

The 9180 1.05 can easily supply 500rwkw worth of airflow.  the rest of the setup will need to support this, fuel is the biggest factor (knock)

Full-Race has a few in stock, there will be a sale for the big holiday in the states this weekend

BTW, I meant awkw, not rwkw.

21 minutes ago, Piggaz said:

Piss it in. 8374/1.45 on my setup went 517 AWKW at 122,000 turbine RPM. 490 AWKW with the 1.05 bum.

Thanks mate. Is that on a 2.8 and on 98 or flex? Looks like you were just under the line there - for the 8374, is it 125k max shaft. speed?

Paul , you have had the 1.45 on for a while now and at first you were sort of thinking about switching back to the 1.05.

You have had a few runs now and one today with Dan , have you made your mind up yet ?

 

2 hours ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

you have had a few runs now and one today with Dan , have you made your mind up yet ?

 

Nugget. Spending money on the wrong things, needs a shift boot and a front lip ffs.

I am too upset to talk about it in depth right now but will update with more when I am back in NZ ?;)

Edited by Lithium
56 minutes ago, fatz said:

1.45 no good? 

 

Dont they make like 4 million kw in seppo land? 

1.45 has its place. Did the Huntley hill climb today and just doodling through it at a corner that I had huge issues with the twins, it was ready to turn tyres.

I won’t be going back to the 1.05. Sub 3000 RPM there is Definately a penalty to pay, it feels a bit “soft”, from 4000 RPM it’s fine. If you’re “driving it” it’s all there. The 0.92 IMO should be made redundant IMO. No need for it.

Still well infront is the -5’s that we’re on it either way. 

Without the head work you have done and slightly higher CR 9.1 ish , would the 1.45 still give you what you want or just lag it to much for what you like in a Street car

Guess without some sort of comparison it would be hard to know how much difference it would make .

11 hours ago, Nismo 3.2ish said:

Without the head work you have done and slightly higher CR 9.1 ish , would the 1.45 still give you what you want or just lag it to much for what you like in a Street car

Guess without some sort of comparison it would be hard to know how much difference it would make .

Stock head no.

Depends on what you want, what you’re happy with. Having driven both, I would want my cake and eat it too. If the engine ever comes out I’ll throw a V cam at it and possibly bump the compression up a tad higher. Cake and eat it too?

As you know I am thinking of doing some headwork ( never ends lol) wondering if anyone has a 3.0 or 3.2 Lt that has has the compression increased  up to 10.5 ish   , mine is down to 8.1 for whatever reason during work on the stroker build ?

Maybe also done  some port & polish work?

Back to back Dyno runs would be great 

I will stick with the 8374/1.05 

Of course you should do that.  8:1 is 1980s CR for boost.  But you won't get that increase by changing the head. You'll need pistons.

20% increase in capacity means a 20% increase in head flow wouldn't be a bad idea.  Easily achieved with sensible porting.  1mm bigger valves gives the perfect opportunity to properly do the seat angles and shape the bowl into the back of the seats.  And there goes 5 grand.

8 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Of course you should do that.  8:1 is 1980s CR for boost.  But you won't get that increase by changing the head. You'll need pistons.

20% increase in capacity means a 20% increase in head flow wouldn't be a bad idea.  Easily achieved with sensible porting.  1mm bigger valves gives the perfect opportunity to properly do the seat angles and shape the bowl into the back of the seats.  And there goes 5 grand.

A decent full effort head costs as much as the bottom end. That’s where the last 15% of performance is found. Depends on how much that last bit is worth to you.

 

 

Sort it out Pete!

20 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

Of course you should do that.  8:1 is 1980s CR for boost.  But you won't get that increase by changing the head. You'll need pistons.

20% increase in capacity means a 20% increase in head flow wouldn't be a bad idea.  Easily achieved with sensible porting.  1mm bigger valves gives the perfect opportunity to properly do the seat angles and shape the bowl into the back of the seats.  And there goes 5 grand.

There will have to be new pistons to go with the new work, it will have to be done properly especially with the Vcam in the car, I already have 1mm OS valves 

i decided that if I am going to pull the donk down, get it all done at the same time

Wouldn’t do it if I did not have E85 close by now ?

24 minutes ago, Piggaz said:

A decent full effort head costs as much as the bottom end. That’s where the last 15% of performance is found. Depends on how much that last bit is worth to you.

 

 

Sort it out Pete!

Yeah mate , as you know I have been tossing it around for a long time and can’t help myself, must do it , have to feel the difference when I press the peddle, like an Fn drug ?

Just now, fatz said:

Pulling down a running motor is just dumb

just saying

 

break then fix

Know what you mean but I am not going to break it anytime soon and at 76 , F it I want to finish It , just wish I knew what I wanted at the getgo, but I think there are many blokes doing work on their cars and the goal posts just seem to keep moving 

But I had no idea I would go this far , it just gets in your blood like herpies and just keeps coming back when you think it over ?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • https://www.facebook.com/share/19kSVAc4tc/?mibextid=wwXIfr
    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
×
×
  • Create New...