Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Duncan said:

I guess it depends how much you use a car, but my #1 reason for killing lead acid batteries is not driving the car (charging the battery) often enough,. I've got sick enough of dying batteries that I've switched to AGM; they are much more expensive but deal better with cold weather and almost always recover from being dead flat, unlike lead acid ones

Yes, letting batteries go flat, and then recharging them is not kind on them at all. My above was more around as the batteries age on. Going flat and recharging them very quickly shortens their life span.

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, MBS206 said:

Yes, letting batteries go flat, and then recharging them is not kind on them at all. My above was more around as the batteries age on. Going flat and recharging them very quickly shortens their life span.

Yup. When I bought my car initially, the battery was flat for a long time and took over a week of constantly driving to FINALLY get the light to go green on the battery. Then if I didn't drive for a few days it would go red (as in needs a recharge), it just got weak as it sat for too long. Ended up destroying part of my security system and would set off my alarm randomly lol. Now I just use a trickle charger, great stuff and repairs your battery to.

1 hour ago, Duncan said:

I guess it depends how much you use a car, but my #1 reason for killing lead acid batteries is not driving the car (charging the battery) often enough,. I've got sick enough of dying batteries that I've switched to AGM; they are much more expensive but deal better with cold weather and almost always recover from being dead flat, unlike lead acid ones

Why not just get a trickle charger?

  • Like 1

lol yes, I have 3 trickle chargers....but even if you don't have too many cars they still need a secure space near 240v to be connected....FWIW I also have battery earth disconnect switches on the cars I use least, just open bonnet and turn switch after use

...plus I think it was earlier in this very thread when Dose had a charger fail and try to burn his car down without warning

  • Like 2
On 14/07/2025 at 6:26 AM, Duncan said:

lol yes, I have 3 trickle chargers....but even if you don't have too many cars they still need a secure space near 240v to be connected....FWIW I also have battery earth disconnect switches on the cars I use least, just open bonnet and turn switch after use

...plus I think it was earlier in this very thread when Dose had a charger fail and try to burn his car down without warning

Now that worries me because mine is on 24/7 and bonnet closed for my security system lol. I'll just hope for the best.

I got sick of thinking about batteries so just kept buying chargers.

I've got a ctek (racecar), a "noco" thing from supercheap (tow car with 2 batteries), and an old "SupaCharge" branded lead acid thing (farm ute/mower) and will need 1 more when the Silvia gets a battery again (if the 86 stays). 

I always make sure the charger itself is in free space/away from car etc, just to be sure. 

 

  • 2 months later...

Long time no random post about shit.

So I went down this deep deep rabbit hole of battery storage for the home, ended up locking in a 41.9kWh Fox ESS EQ4800 with 9 units stacked.

image.thumb.png.d234feb3b11b8673e18faf7fb472c9f7.png

Battery uses Lithium Iron Phosphate, similar to what you find in those deep cycle boat/caravan batteries.

And yes, why did I go with a cheapie brand and not like Synergy? simply because I don't plan to stay at this house for more than another 3~5 years. 

The entire install, DC coupling (removal of existing invertor, connecting the current 6.6kW array direct to the battery invertor), new 8kW invertor is $6K all up (after all the rebates etc.). Going with this lot: https://www.aussiesolarbatteries.com.au/

image.thumb.png.20fb0bc0007b06d6bd57d1aa2f72f98b.png

It did seem a bit too good to be true, however seems like the Whirlpool community has vetted it and when it comes to this kind of stuff, they seem to be all over it:

https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/thread/9pxj8482?p=38

 

I've requested for the battery to be installed outside, next to my meter board and not inside - rather have it combust and ignite outside lol.

 

 

30 minutes ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Long time no random post about shit.

So I went down this deep deep rabbit hole of battery storage for the home, ended up locking in a 41.9kWh Fox ESS EQ4800 with 9 units stacked.

image.thumb.png.d234feb3b11b8673e18faf7fb472c9f7.png

Battery uses Lithium Iron Phosphate, similar to what you find in those deep cycle boat/caravan batteries.

And yes, why did I go with a cheapie brand and not like Synergy? simply because I don't plan to stay at this house for more than another 3~5 years. 

The entire install, DC coupling (removal of existing invertor, connecting the current 6.6kW array direct to the battery invertor), new 8kW invertor is $6K all up (after all the rebates etc.). Going with this lot: https://www.aussiesolarbatteries.com.au/

image.thumb.png.20fb0bc0007b06d6bd57d1aa2f72f98b.png

It did seem a bit too good to be true, however seems like the Whirlpool community has vetted it and when it comes to this kind of stuff, they seem to be all over it:

https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/thread/9pxj8482?p=38 

Always curious about the latest Aussie online trends here

I've requested for the battery to be installed outside, next to my meter board and not inside - rather have it combust and ignite outside lol.

 

 

The price is really great for that kind of capacity. I thought similar setups cost way more.

How's your efficiency been with the DC-coupling? I've heard sometimes there can be a bit of a performance loss.

7 minutes ago, tardis3 said:

The price is really great for that kind of capacity. I thought similar setups cost way more.

How's your efficiency been with the DC-coupling? I've heard sometimes there can be a bit of a performance loss.

Time will tell, they're doing all the admin stuff at the moment.

I've submitted all the required details, photos, etc.

 

I was under the impression that DC coupling is the best approach, i.e.:
Solar Array -> Battery Invertor -> Battery 

Where as AC Coupling is simpler, however less efficient, i.e.:
Solar Array -> Solar Invertor -> Battery Invertor -> Battery

On 26/09/2025 at 4:24 PM, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Long time no random post about shit.

So I went down this deep deep rabbit hole of battery storage for the home, ended up locking in a 41.9kWh Fox ESS EQ4800 with 9 units stacked.

image.thumb.png.d234feb3b11b8673e18faf7fb472c9f7.png

Battery uses Lithium Iron Phosphate, similar to what you find in those deep cycle boat/caravan batteries.

And yes, why did I go with a cheapie brand and not like Synergy? simply because I don't plan to stay at this house for more than another 3~5 years. 

The entire install, DC coupling (removal of existing invertor, connecting the current 6.6kW array direct to the battery invertor), new 8kW invertor is $6K all up (after all the rebates etc.). Going with this lot: https://www.aussiesolarbatteries.com.au/

image.thumb.png.20fb0bc0007b06d6bd57d1aa2f72f98b.png

It did seem a bit too good to be true, however seems like the Whirlpool community has vetted it and when it comes to this kind of stuff, they seem to be all over it:

https://forums.whirlpool.net.au/thread/9pxj8482?p=38

 

I've requested for the battery to be installed outside, next to my meter board and not inside - rather have it combust and ignite outside lol.

 

 

Am I wrong in thinking that there is a hell of a lot of battery storage for a 6.6 feed into it

Your battery is around 4 times bigger than the battery that is going into my place in a week, but I have nearly twice the feed

Will the batteries actually ever get fully charged?

School me on the science bitches 

 

8 minutes ago, The Bogan said:

Will the batteries actually ever get fully charged?

School me on the science bitches 

My 3.8 kW system (when new, not so much nearly 20 yrs later) will do 21 kWh per day (best few months of the year), and that's with an afternoon shading issue. So it really could/should be able to do maybe 24.

So a 6.6 kW system probably cannot fill a 40ish kWh battery from scratch, but then it is very unlikely to ever need to. Let's presume that you use 10-15 kWh during the day and stash the rest. So long as the battery isn't drawn down below ~50%, it'll be fine. And that draw down presumes using 20 kWh overnight, which is a reasonably heavy draw. So that seems reasonable.

The 40kWh will be good for extended outages, and very bad days where you get almost no generation for a day or two. Might struggle to top it all the way back up after it gets pulled all the way down though.

I'd think you'd probably want about 10 kW of panels to make life a little easier, wrt keeping a 40 kWh battery charged. But then....does it really need to be at 100% every day? Probably not.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
23 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

My 3.8 kW system (when new, not so much nearly 20 yrs later) will do 21 kWh per day (best few months of the year), and that's with an afternoon shading issue. So it really could/should be able to do maybe 24.

So a 6.6 kW system probably cannot fill a 40ish kWh battery from scratch, but then it is very unlikely to ever need to. Let's presume that you use 10-15 kWh during the day and stash the rest. So long as the battery isn't drawn down below ~50%, it'll be fine. And that draw down presumes using 20 kWh overnight, which is a reasonably heavy draw. So that seems reasonable.

The 40kWh will be good for extended outages, and very bad days where you get almost no generation for a day or two. Might struggle to top it all the way back up after it gets pulled all the way down though.

I'd think you'd probably want about 10 kW of panels to make life a little easier, wrt keeping a 40 kWh battery charged. But then....does it really need to be at 100% every day? Probably not.

I might need to invest in at least another battery, maybe...as the battery going in is a 19.2kWh, which is larger than I initially thought when I replied, the panels are 10.56kW

  • Like 1
44 minutes ago, The Bogan said:

Am I wrong in thinking that there is a hell of a lot of battery storage for a 6.6 feed into it

If go with OVO or similar, you can buy electricity off peak periods of the day for next to nothing, i.e. when the sun is out and everyone is exporting and noone is consuming.

I'm also planning to join a VPP and sell back during peak hours.

Bro science stacks up, and also the battery inverter has a spare MPPT port, so I could add another solar array. I still have the roof space for at least another 7 panels.

 

  • Like 1
7 hours ago, Murray_Calavera said:

I've never heard of this before, how does it work? 

Have a read of this:

https://www.energy.nsw.gov.au/households/rebates-grants-and-schemes/household-energy-saving-upgrades/connect-your-battery-virtual

 

Just one thing, your battery setup also must be supported by the retailer, at the moment for Fox Ess, only Amber supports it however that should expand with time.

9 hours ago, Murray_Calavera said:

I've never heard of this before, how does it work? 

 

2 hours ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

I'm extremely suspicious of the VPP stuff. Best I can tell, you surrender any and all control of your panels and battery to the VPP, because there's no way that anyone could write a sufficiently useful set of "rules" as to how much you would be willing to let out of your export meter at any given time.

If one of your main interests is to have enough in your battery every evening to get you through the night without having to import, you could easily find yourself with nothing in your battery at the end of the day, or part way through the night, and then be paying import pricing instead of paying nothing. I cannot see how this cannot come to pass.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Latest Posts

    • It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about. Reliability of everything in a 34 drops MASSIVELY above the 300kw mark. Keeping everything going great at beyond that value will cost ten times the $. Clutches become shit, gearboxes (and engines/bottom ends) become consumable, traction becomes crap. The good news is looking legalish/actually being legal is slighly under the 300kw mark. I would make the assumption you want to ditch the stock plenum too and want to go a front facing unit of some description due to the cross flow. Do the bends on a return flow hurt? Not really. A couple of bends do make a difference but not nearly as much in a forced induction situation. Add 1psi of boost to overcome it. Nobody has ever gone and done a track session monitoring IAT then done a different session on a different intercooler and monitored IAT to see the difference here. All of the benefits here are likely in the "My engine is a forged consumable that I drive once a year because it needs a rebuild every year which takes 9 months of the year to complete" territory. It would be well worth deciding where you want to go and what you care about with this car.
    • By "reverse flow", do you mean "return flow"? Being the IC having a return pipe back behind the bumper reo, or similar? If so... I am currently making ~250 rwkW on a Neo at ~17-18 psi. With a return flow. There's nothing to indicate that it is costing me a lot of power at this level, and I would be surprised if I could not push it harder. True, I have not measured pressure drop across it or IAT changes, but the car does not seem upset about it in any way. I won't be bothering to look into it unless it starts giving trouble or doesn't respond to boost increases when I next put it on the dyno. FWIW, it was tuned with the boost controller off, so achieving ~15-16 psi on the wastegate spring alone, and it is noticeably quicker with the boost controller on and yielding a couple of extra pounds. Hence why I think it is doing OK. So, no, I would not arbitrarily say that return flows are restrictive. Yes, they are certainly restrictive if you're aiming for higher power levels. But I also think that the happy place for a street car is <300 rwkW anyway, so I'm not going to be aiming for power levels that would require me to change the inlet pipework. My car looks very stock, even though everything is different. The turbo and inlet pipes all look stock and run in the stock locations, The airbox looks stock (apart from the inlet being opened up). The turbo looks stock, because it's in the stock location, is the stock housings and can't really be seen anyway. It makes enough power to be good to drive, but won't raise eyebrows if I ever f**k up enough for the cops to lift the bonnet.
    • There is a guy who said he can weld me piping without having to cut chassis, maybe I do that ? Or do I just go reverse flow but isn’t reverse flow very limited once again? 
    • I haven’t yet cut the chassis, maybe I switch to a reverse flow. I’ve got the Intercooler mounted as I already had it but not cut yet. Might have to speak to an engineer 
    • Yes that’s another issue, I always have a front mount, plus will be turbo plus intake will big hasstle. I’ve been told if it looks stock they’re fine with it by a couple others who have done it ahahaha.    I know @Kinkstaah said the stock gtt airbox is limiting but I might just have to do that to avoid a defect so it atleast looks legit. Or an enclosed pod so it’s hidden away and feed air from the snorkel and below Intercooler holes like kinstaah mentioned. Hmm what to do 
×
×
  • Create New...