Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

w00t the People For Less Sections Party (PFLSP) have won the vote :)

PFLSP ?

hmmm... if i look at it a bit... and move some letters around ...

and add an o.... or 2..

and just switch this one, with that one.... it almost looks like ....

POOFS

Heres my plan;

GENERAL

-General Automotive Discussion

-Vehicle Specific Discusion

---Stagea

---Ceffy

---etc

-Motorsport

-Importation

MAINTENANCE/MODS

As is, removing Bodykits (merge into general automotive).

WORLD

As is, move sports/news -> wasteland

 

Optinions?

 

Christian

Sounds great to me! :D

new layout roxxors, but may i suggest swapping the positions of GAD and Vehice Specific Discussion?

as it is right now is like having

Merli likes it:

a) up the ass

B) in his ear

c) none of the above

d) all of the above

General automotive is an abortion.

Plain and simple.

It's just being bombarded with posts from people who don't know where to post things.

I just went in there and filed everything on the first page into its own little section, and now it's an entire page of "moved" threads. (again)

I'd like to make another suggestion... lose 'general automotive' altogether.

If people want to post something that doesn't fit into one of the dozen or more existing forums, then it belongs in the wasteland.

i hate going into general automotive and seeing moved everywhere...

if it is going to stay the same, can we not have the moved things stay there?!?!

james.

This is why I'm pleading for it to be changed.

I can make it so the 'moved' things are't there, but that involves sending pm's to each poster, telling them where their thread has been moved to.

That may not sound like such a task when there are only one or two threads that need moving, but when it's 15 or so at a time, it's a bit overwhelming. :Oops:

OK.. I just went and moved another 9 threads (i think it was 9)

It took me almost 20 minutes to move them to their correct sections and notify the posters.

People just don't know where to post. :Oops:

  • 5 months later...

I personly tohught the bodykits section undermods and maintanence was good coz it was an ares for ppl to chuck around different ideas etc about that topic only, I was going to post a new thread up about this but decided i would search first and this thread loks good enough to sook in.

MY SOOK - Put bodykits back under Mods and Maintance......please :P

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I don't. I mean, mine's not a GTR, but it is a 32 with a lot of GTR stuff on it. But regardless, I typically buy from local suppliers. Getting stuff from Japan is seldom worth the pain. Buying from RHDJapan usually ends up in the final total of your basket being about double what you thought it would be, after all the bullshit fees and such are added on.
    • The hydrocarbon component of E10 can be shittier, and is in fact, shittier, than that used in normal 91RON fuel. That's because the octane boost provided by the ethanol allows them to use stuff that doesn't make the grade without the help. The 1c/L saving typically available on E10 is going to be massively overridden by the increased consumption caused by the ethanol and the crappier HC (ie the HCs will be less dense, meaning that there will definitely be less energy per unit volume than for more dense HCs). That is one of the reasons why P98 will return better fuel consumption than 91 does, even with the ignition timing completely fixed. There is more energy per unit volume because the HCs used in 98 are higher density than in the lawnmower fuel.
    • No, I'd suggest that that is the checklist for pneumatic/hydraulic adjustable systems. I would say, based on my years of reading and complying with Australian Standards and similar regulations, that the narrow interpretation of Clause 3.2 b would be the preferred/expected/intended one, by the author, and those using the standard. Wishful thinking need not apply.
    • Yes they do. For some maybe. But for those used the most by abusers, ie Skylines, the numbers are known. The stock eyebrow height for R32/3 Skylines is about 365/375mm or thereabouts. The minimum such heights are recorded in adjacent columns in the database.
    • Hmmm, interesting. Makes me wonder whether there is bias as well. It's the cheapest fuel, so it is used for all kinds of ill-maintained shitboxes which are bound to have issues regardless. Nicer cars tend to require higher octane rated fuel and can't use it anyway. FWIW, the official NSW E10 facts page is decent. 
×
×
  • Create New...