Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

now thats going too far. You've have 3-4 pages on new threads/posts every 2-3 hours. It'd be too tough to moderate for one.

You have to have some split sections to filter stuff to a certain extent on specifics

I never said to combine everything into 3-4 forums.

I merely said that REALISTICALLY, that's what most people read, and that's what they have time to read... So splitting them up into 10 different forums, means they will still only read the 3-4 main forums and a lot of the threads that used to be in those main forums will now go unread by a good percentage of previous readers.

Maybe 70% of people would read GAD, Forced Induction/NA, State Forum and For Sale... But only 5% of people would read Suspension, Motorsport, Stagea, Cefiro, Bodykits, Car Audio, National Events, News, Sports, Games, Computer Art, etc etc...

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

The happy medium was exactly how it was before this "forum splitting crusade" :)

oh please!! you can be a slight drama queen sometimes Andrew.

I am just waiting to see what other feedback we will get. At this stage, Skylines Disc and GAD will be merged again and bodykits will be removed.

 

so, motorsport subforums removed? what else? merge Skyline discussion and GAD?

I concur.

Prank check out this thread:

http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...?t=46721&page=4

The news and sports section don't get a whole lot of posts, and what is being posted in there is generally more "wasteland" type material.

~K

Are changes going to be actioned anytime soon? :D

People have started double posting because there are so many forums now, they don't know where to post their threads.

e.g.

"Making an R33 GTR two wheel drive" by T517zGTR

Forced Induction - http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=48173

Skyline Related Discussion - http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=48174

"How To Launch??????" by drewecrome

Forced Induction - http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=48032

Motorsport - http://www.skylinesaustralia.com/forums/sh...ead.php?t=47955

Just two that I've noticed, I'm sure there are more ;)

This is the point though.

So funkymonkey has a question about this awesome bodykit he saw on the road, and wants it for his car. That bodykit is actually developed by my good mates at ABC Fibreglass.

But since it has been seperated from the Skyline Automotive forum, and I don't have enough interest in bodykits to click on that forum and read it, that question might go unanswered for 2 weeks until someone else can answer the question, whereas if it was still part of the Skyline Automotive forum, which I read, I would have answered it within 5 minutes, with contact number, price and availability.

The effect of splitting up different topics into different forums might seem like a tidier layout, but it has the follow-on effect of placing threads into forums that very few people read, as they don't have enough interest in that forum to regularly read it, but can answer the questions posed in there straight away if it were presented to them in their commonly read forums.

:werd: i had a bit of a re-read of this thread and what you say Merli is true. I'm finding some of the most simple questions going unanswered for weeks, and the poor bastard who started the thread has been talking to himself the whole time. Compact the sub-sections back to the way they were.

-rb25

I agree with Merli, too many sub-threads, most of which are unnecessary.

:werd:

here's my suggestion:

Automotive have 3 sub forums (General, Motorsport, Importation...) so combine Skyline, Ceffy, Stag etc...into General

get rid of the bodykit sub forum

For World & Other Things I reckon scrap a lot of it as they're isn't enough traffic to warrant their use. Move everything into The Wasteland except Japan. Probably best to delete National events if each state has their own Events forum. And I don't think their needs to be an archive forum for each event forum.

Heres my plan;

GENERAL

-General Automotive Discussion

-Vehicle Specific Discusion

---Stagea

---Ceffy

---etc

-Motorsport

-Importation

MAINTENANCE/MODS

As is, removing Bodykits (merge into general automotive).

WORLD

As is, move sports/news -> wasteland

Optinions?

Christian

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...