Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I'm not being contradictory I'm stating facts the Garrett plates on the turbos are 14411-AA403, now what the car is producing powerwise and what I am seeing full boost at is not what they should be. I will try to post some pics of the plates on the turbos. There is a slight lope at idle, not enough to be super large cams. 

20 minutes ago, Trailmix said:

No matter the difference in dynos. My turbos are not that responsive low end like a -7 should be not seeing full boost until 5500 range. The gtx2860/2863 should spool up around the same, as my current setup? 

Let me explain. 

 

N1s are full boost (low 20s) WAY earlier than that, even with Cams, unless it has the tamest tune in history.

N1s, on pump fuel are not going to make 530rwhp, not here anyway. 

5500RPM is high boost on -5s territory, with big cams, on pump.... 

"GTX2860/2863 should spool up around the same, as my current setup? " Who knows, because your setup is a mystery. 

A tag on a housing means nothing if the cores are not standard. 

None of what you're saying adds up so we're not going to be able to help you easily. 

 



 

Edited by ActionDan

I'm running VP C9 fuel which is 100ron, which is not going to make -7 produce like -5. Though I  should be getting retuned on a haltech in the near future I will post results with more data boost, afrs and timing. 

Edited by Trailmix

Dragging this back on topic, I think Dan (Lithium) is on the money here.

A GTX 2860 flows just on what a pair of GT RS's do. Seeing that you goal is 600-650 whp, there is no need to go any larger than the 60 mm unit. Don't go putting the wheels where they don't belong (T25 housings). They never perform as well as GTX's in their original homes! GTR guys could learn something from the Gtst boys here ?. Yes it will mean playing with piping but if you're hell bent on staying twins, do it properly!

Do yourself a favour though, put those stupid Tomei manifolds in the bin. They don't add anything over a set of tickled up stockers (I backed to back them years ago)... but won't crack! (I cracked two sets myself).

2863's and above need more turbine IMO. The side that no one ever seems to look at or consider. The compressor is only half the turbo. It has to get out too!

  • Like 3
7 minutes ago, Piggaz said:

Dragging this back on topic, I think Dan (Lithium) is on the money here.

A GTX 2860 flows just on what a pair of GT RS's do. Seeing that you goal is 600-650 whp, there is no need to go any larger than the 60 mm unit. Don't go putting the wheels where they don't belong (T25 housings). They never perform as well as GTX's in their original homes! GTR guys could learn something from the Gtst boys here ?. Yes it will mean playing with piping but if you're hell bent on staying twins, do it properly!

Do yourself a favour though, put those stupid Tomei manifolds in the bin. They don't add anything over a set of tickled up stockers (I backed to back them years ago)... but won't crack! (I cracked two sets myself).

2863's and above need more turbine IMO. The side that no one ever seems to look at or consider. The compressor is only half the turbo. It has to get out too!

I'm a real life guinea pig putting 2863 GTX wheels into what is essentially a -9 turbo (2510). I'll let you know how much money i wasted on Friday when i get my car back :-)

16 minutes ago, djvoodoo said:

I'm a real life guinea pig putting 2863 GTX wheels into what is essentially a -9 turbo (2510). I'll let you know how much money i wasted on Friday when i get my car back :-)

If you look up the turbine wheel size of a 2510, it's significantly smaller than a -9. Putting a compressor capable of flowing north of 40 lb/min (when in the original housing) being driven by a peanut rear isn't ideal for a goal of 350 kw. It screams mini  2540! Too much compressor, not enough hot side.

 

IMG_4367.JPG

Just now, djvoodoo said:

Isn't a GT-SS rated at 560 ps and the 2510 rated at 600ps though?

Look at the turbine wheel sizes.

Bench marking turbo's on a horse power number is as useless as tits on a bull.

  • Like 2
7 minutes ago, TXSquirrel said:

Those output ratings are per turbo at the crank, so if running twin then x2.  Like Garrett rates the -7s at 250ps and -5s at 310ps.

On what fuel?

On what engine?

Run those turbo's on a diesel car, will you still get the same power?

5 minutes ago, Piggaz said:

On what fuel?

On what engine?

Run those turbo's on a diesel car, will you still get the same power?

Those questions are for Garrett corporate since that is what they publish on their website.

2 hours ago, TXSquirrel said:

Those questions are for Garrett corporate since that is what they publish on their website.

Smh.

For a start, if you read the Garrett technical articles to try and broaden your horizons a bit (try starting here: https://www.turbobygarrett.com/turbobygarrett/turbo_tech_basic) you'll find that their tech info contradicts what is just meant to be a loose guideline for people who don't know enough to work out the suitability of a turbo for their car better.  I think it's a silly idea doing even that as it causes this kind of conversation, and I was sick of them ten years ago.  There are WAY too many variables involved to make a power claim like that, as evidenced by the fact that if you put a 525hp rated GT3076R on a motor with no supporting mods it doesn't instantly make 525hp just because it has a 525hp rating.

Now, my experience with people saying the things you have so far there is no point me pushing that point further so I'll stick with something much more obvious and easy to digest (hopefully).  HKS did NOT put that power rating on the GT2510, and they have never put a power rating on a HKS/Garrett GTX2563R as they never made one - so there is no reason to think that squeezing a compressor wheel from a GTX2863R into the compressor housing of a GT2510 and make the engine it's feeding try and flow through the GT2510 exhaust wheel is going to result in way more power than HKS ever rated the GT2510 to.

So yes, sure - someone can physically make some Frankenstein out of Garrett and HKS bits... but don't expect to take the technical or marketing documentation of those two and expect them to reflect on what the resulting mutant will behave like.   

Edited by Lithium
  • Like 2

I understand what you are talking about, and I am absolutely fully aware of that.

Piggaz posted a table, djvoodoo had a question about a number in that table, I answered how that number is meant to be x2, then I provided an example from Garrett because that is also how Garrett markets their products.  

So that's about it.  And I doubt anyone who is actually viewing this board would take those marketing materials as absolute, this audience is better than that.

Ok.....

 

So the internet winz again. Wasted my time and money.

I gained power right up the top of the rev range. Apart from that, i lost power, torque and response pretty much everywhere else. Is laggy too.........

Untitled.jpg

  • Like 2
2 hours ago, djvoodoo said:

imageproxy.php?img=&key=4b1e78680f916b86

Ok.....

 

So the internet winz again. Wasted my time and money.

I gained power right up the top of the rev range. Apart from that, i lost power, torque and response pretty much everywhere else. Is laggy too.........

 

Shit that sucks.  To be honest that is worse than I expected... Enough so that I suspect that something may need sorting there.  How did you do the compressor upgrade etc?  Is there any chance something isn't air tight or whatever ?

I am a skeptic of the combo BUT that still seems a bit off to me.  What did it make before playing with the turbos?

 

Edit: oh pump gas.  Right that explains some of it but that lag seems over the top to me still 

Edited by Lithium
1 hour ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

LOL...

It's worse than a GTS-t with an eBay turbo.

Didn't we all advise you not to do It?

Yep!!!!!!!! and i didn't listen lol.

Now very likely to go to a nice single turbo.

Lesson learnt... the hard way.... 

  • Like 1
1 hour ago, Lithium said:

Shit that sucks.  To be honest that is worse than I expected... Enough so that I suspect that something may need sorting there.  How did you do the compressor upgrade etc?  Is there any chance something isn't air tight or whatever ?

I am a skeptic of the combo BUT that still seems a bit off to me.  What did it make before playing with the turbos?

 

Edit: oh pump gas.  Right that explains some of it but that lag seems over the top to me still 

Turbos were rebuilt by a reputable shop in Syd. Won't name names, but when I asked, i specifically said were they going to be laggier than a -9 and they answer was 'no, should be more responsive'....

I am using Garrett 15psi actuators. Tuner had them set to 15psi as i asked.

Everything seems airtight, but i'll need to take a closer look. 

Voodoo, out of curiosity, what did that whole exercise set you back? I wouldn't imagine it would have been cheap.

It would be more than a bit disappointing for sure!

Whats the plan now? Will you leave the twins on there for a while?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • See if you can thermal epoxy a heatsink or two onto it?
    • The other problem was one of those "oh shit we are going to die moments". Basically the high spec Q50s have a full electric steering rack, and the povo ones had a regular hydraulic rack with an electric pump.  So couple of laps into session 5 as I came into turn 2 (big run off now, happily), the dash turned into a christmas tree and the steering became super heavy and I went well off. I assumed it was a tyre failure so limped to the pits, but everything was OK. But....the master warning light was still on so I checked the DTCs and saw – C13E6 “Heat Protection”. Yes, that bloody steering rack computer sitting where the oil cooler should be has its own sensors and error logic, and decided I was using the steering wheel too much. I really appreciated the helpful information in the manual (my bold) POSSIBLE CAUSE • Continuing the overloading steering (Sports driving in the circuit etc,) “DATA MONITOR” >> “C/M TEMPERATURE”. The rise of steering force motor internal temperature caused the protection function to operate. This is not a system malfunction. INSPECTION END So, basically the electric motor in the steering rack got to 150c, and it decided to shut down without warning for my safety. Didn't feel safe. Short term I'll see if I can duct some air to that motor (the engine bay is sealed pretty tight). Long term, depending on how often this happens, I'll look into swapping the povo spec electric/hydraulic rack in. While the rack should be fine the power supply to the pump will be a pain and might be best to deal with it when I add a PDM.
    • And finally, 2 problems I really need to sort.  Firstly as Matt said the auto trans is not happy as it gets hot - I couldn't log the temps but the gauge showed 90o. On the first day I took it out back in Feb, because the coolant was getting hot I never got to any auto trans issues; but on this day by late session 3 and then really clearly in 4 and 5 as it got hotter it just would not shift up. You can hear the issue really clearly at 12:55 and 16:20 on the vid. So the good news is, literally this week Ecutek finally released tuning for the jatco 7 speed. I'll have a chat to Racebox and see what they can do electrically to keep it cooler and to get the gears, if anything. That will likely take some R&D and can only really happen on track as it never gets even warm with road use. I've also picked up some eye wateringly expensive Redline D6 ATF to try, it had the highest viscosity I could find at 100o so we will see if that helps (just waiting for some oil pan gaskets so I can change it properly). If neither of those work I need to remove the coolant/trans interwarmer and the radiator cooler and go to an external cooler....somewhere.....(goodbye washer reservoir?), and if that fails give up on this mad idea and wait for Nissan to release the manual 400R
    • So, what else.... Power. I don't know what it is making because I haven't done a post tune dyno run yet; I will when I get a chance. It was 240rwkw dead stock. Conclusion from the day....it does not need a single kw more until I sort some other stuff. It comes on so hard that I could hear the twin N1 turbos on the R32 crying, and I just can't use what it has around a tight track with the current setup. Brakes. They are perfect. Hit them hard all day and they never felt like having an issue; you can see in the video we were making ground on much lighter cars on better tyres under brakes. They are standard (red sport) calipers, standard size discs in DBA5000 2 piece, Winmax pads and Motul RBF600 fluid, all from Matty at Racebrakes Sydney. Keeping in mind the car is more powerful than my R32 and weighs 1780, he clearly knows his shit. Suspension. This is one of the first areas I need to change. It has electronically controlled dampers from factory, but everything is just way too soft for track work even on the hardest setting (it is nice when hustling on country roads though). In particular it rolls into oversteer mid corner and pitches too much under hard braking so it becomes unstable eg in the turn 1 kink I need to brake early, turn through the kink then brake again so I don't pirouette like an AE86. I need to get some decent shocks with matched springs and sway bars ASAP, even if it is just a v1 setup until I work out a proper race/rally setup later. Tyres. I am running Yoko A052 in 235/45/18 all round, because that was what I could get in approximately the right height on wheels I had in the shed (Rays/Nismo 18x8 off the old Leaf actually!). As track tyres they are pretty poor; I note GTSBoy recently posted a porker comparo video including them where they were about the same as AD09.....that is nothing like a top line track tyre. I'll start getting that sorted but realistically I should get proper sized wheels first (likely 9.5 +38 front and 11 +55 at the rear, so a custom order, and I can't rotate them like the R32), then work out what the best tyre option is. BTW on that, Targa Tas had gone to road tyres instead of semi slicks now so that is a whole other world of choices to sort. Diff. This is the other thing that urgently needs to be addressed. It left massive 1s out of the fish hook all day, even when I was trying not too (you can also hear it reving on the video, and see the RPM rising too fast compared to speed in the data). It has an open diff that Infiniti optimistically called a B-LSD for "Brake Limited Slip Diff". It does good straight line standing start 11s but it is woeful on the track. Nismo seem to make a 2 way for it.
    • Also, I logged some data from the ECU for each session (mostly oil pressures and various temps, but also speed, revs etc, can't believe I forgot accelerator position). The Ecutek data loads nicely to datazap, I got good data from sessions 2, 3 and 4: https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-2?log=0&data=7 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-3?log=0&data=6 https://datazap.me/u/duncanhandleyhgeconsultingcomau/250813-wakefield-session-4?log=0&data=6 Each session is cut into 3 files but loaded together, you can change between them in the top left. As the test sessions are mostly about the car, not me, I basically start by checking the oil pressure (good, or at least consistent all day). These have an electrically controlled oil pump which targets 25psi(!) at low load and 50 at high. I'm running a much thicker oil than recommended by nissan (they said 0w20, I'm running 10w40) so its a little higher. The main thing is that it doesn't drop too far, eg in the long left hand fish hook, or under brakes so I know I'm not getting oil surge. Good start. Then Oil and Coolant temp, plus intercooler and intake temps, like this: Keeping in mind ambient was about 5o at session 2, I'd say the oil temp is good. The coolant temp as OK but a big worry for hot days (it was getting to 110 back in Feb when it was 35o) so I need to keep addressing that. The water to air intercooler is working totally backwards where we get 5o air in the intake, squish/warm it in the turbos (unknown temp) then run it through the intercoolers which are say 65o max in this case, then the result is 20o air into the engine......the day was too atypical to draw a conclusion on that I think, in the united states of freedom they do a lot of upsizing the intercooler and heat exchanger cores to get those temps down but they were OK this time. The other interesting (but not concerning) part for me was the turbo speed vs boost graph: I circled an example from the main straight. With the tune boost peaks at around 18psi but it deliberately drops to about 14psi at redline because the turbos are tiny - they choke at high revs and just create more heat than power if you run them hard all the way. But you can also see the turbo speed at the same time; it raises from about 180,000rpm to 210,000rpm which the boost falls....imagine the turbine speed if they held 18psi to redline. The wastegates are electrically controlled so there is a heap of logic about boost target, actual boost, delta etc etc but it all seems to work well
×
×
  • Create New...