Jump to content
SAU Community

Finally.... the car of my dreams

hcr32ROB

By hcr32ROB,
in Introduce yourself

 Share

Recommended Posts

Robocop2310 Experienced

Robocop2310

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, Ben C34 said:

Man you are a genuine tool. Good on ya.

If the gtrs complete you I think you will find it is you with the inferiority complex.

anyway, you have a lot to learn about everything so I'll leave you be to figure out some important life lessons. Rethink choices, contemplate naval etc.

No need to reply. Just as per every other completely nonsensical arguing you have put forward it gets you, and everyone else, no where.

peace out. Go drive a gtr slowly around the place enjoying all that awd has to offer.

Alright mate. Good on ya. 

niZmO_Man Grand Master

niZmO_Man

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, hcr32ROB said:

I’m praying to the skyline gods that the build/mod thread for this car is nowhere near as controversial as this introduction ???

Bored people who over paid for their $40k coupes :P 

I miss my R32 GTS-t, was loads of fun to drive around, even in traffic and crappy roads. Completely standard, sunroof, easy on fuel, lightweight (chuckable). Shame my dad wrapped it around a pole, now I have a GT-R that's too harsh to drive around on the roads all the time (I started modding it for track work), oh well.

Your car looks good. I'd personally go the Type M front bumper as I think the fog lights in it look better than the tacked on GT-R bumper ones.

  • Like 1
hcr32ROB Apprentice

hcr32ROB

Posted
  • Author
Posted
1 minute ago, niZmO_Man said:

Bored people who over paid for their $40k coupes :P 

I miss my R32 GTS-t, was loads of fun to drive around, even in traffic and crappy roads. Completely standard, sunroof, easy on fuel, lightweight (chuckable). Shame my dad wrapped it around a pole, now I have a GT-R that's too harsh to drive around on the roads all the time (I started modding it for track work), oh well.

Your car looks good. I'd personally go the Type M front bumper as I think the fog lights in it look better than the tacked on GT-R bumper ones.

Yeah yeah I see what you mean with the front bumper- 2 options I’m considering. Still undecided ?‍♂️ 

1- gtr bumper and getting new mesh and remove lights

2- going to type m with standard spot lamps 

 

jmknights93 Mentor

jmknights93

Posted
Posted
32 minutes ago, niZmO_Man said:

I miss my R32 GTS-t, was loads of fun to drive around, even in traffic and crappy roads. Completely standard, sunroof, easy on fuel, lightweight (chuckable). Shame my dad wrapped it around a pole, now I have a GT-R that's too harsh to drive around on the roads all the time (I started modding it for track work), oh well.

I can agree with the statement. I miss my old GTS-t also. I hardly drive my GTR now.

GTSBoy Grand Master

GTSBoy

Posted
Posted

Yes and no.  Or, more correctly, no and yes.  Guards have nothing to do with bonnet and grille fitting.  GTR grille does only mount off of GTR headlights.

I have GTR bonnet, grille, headlights & bumper on my car, with GTSt guards.  The proper GTR bumper is slightly too wide/wrong shape to be squeezed onto GTSt guards, but it does fit.  There are repro GTR bumpers made to suit GTSts without that extra little bit of width.

It's possible that there are probably imitation/fake GTR grilles available somewhere that can mount onto a GTSt front end without having to have the right headlights, but I've never looked into it.  I say this because of the existence of GTR style bumpers to go on GTSts....there would need to be a way to fit the grille without having to have the headlights too.

Having said all that, in this day and age of 3D printers and Sikaflex, it should actually be possible to come up with something to stick onto GTSt headlights that would provide the GTR grille mounts.

  • Like 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      God damnit. The only option I actually have in the software is the one that is screenshotted. I am glad that I at least got it right... for those two points. Would it actually change anything if I chose/used 80C and 120C as the two points instead? My brain wants to imagine the formula put into HPtuners would be the same equation, otherwise none of this makes sense to me, unless: 1) The formula you put into VCM Scanner/HPTuners is always linear 2) The two points/input pairs are only arbitrary to choose (as the documentation implies) IF the actual scaling of the sensor is linear. then 3) If the scaling is not linear, the two points you choose matter a great deal, because the formula will draw a line between those two points only.
    • GTSBoy
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      Nah, that is hella wrong. If I do a simple linear between 150°C (0.407v) and 50°C (2.98v) I get the formula Temperature = -38.8651*voltage + 165.8181 It is perfectly correct at 50 and 150, but it is as much as 20° out in the region of 110°C, because the actual data is significantly non-linear there. It is no more than 4° out down at the lowest temperatures, but is is seriously shit almost everywhere. I cannot believe that the instruction is to do a 2 point linear fit. I would say the method I used previously would have to be better.
    • GTSBoy
      DeAgostini 1/8 scale BNR32 Nissan Skyline GT-R Nismo

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      That's hilariously putrid!
    • GTSBoy
      R33 Fuel Pump & Brakes after alarm swap

      By GTSBoy · Posted

      When I said "wiring diagram", I meant the car's wiring diagram. You need to understand how and when 12V appears on certain wires/terminals, when 0V is allowed to appear on certain wires/terminals (which is the difference between supply side switching, and earth side switching), for the way that the car is supposed to work without the immobiliser. Then you start looking for those voltages in the appropriate places at the appropriate times (ie, relay terminals, ECU terminals, fuel pump terminals, at different ignition switch positions, and at times such as "immediately after switching to ON" and "say, 5-10s after switching to ON". You will find that you are not getting what you need when and where you need it, and because you understand what you need and when, from working through the wiring diagram, you can then likely work out why you're not getting it. And that will lead you to the mess that has been made of the associated wires around the immobiliser. But seriously, there is no way that we will be able to find or lead you to the fault from here. You will have to do it at the car, because it will be something f**ked up, and there are a near infinite number of ways for it to be f**ked up. The wiring diagram will give you wire colours and pin numbers and so you can do continuity testing and voltage/time probing and start to work out what is right and what is wrong. I can only close my eyes and imagine a rat's nest of wiring under the dash. You can actually see and touch it.
    • Kinkstaah
      Mistakes were made, my R34 Story

      By Kinkstaah · Posted

      So I found this: https://www.efihardware.com/temperature-sensor-voltage-calculator I didn't know what the pullup resistor is. So I thought if I used my table of known values I could estimate it by putting a value into the pullup resistor, and this should line up with the voltages I had measured. Eventually I got this table out of it by using 210ohms as the pullup resistor. 180C 0.232V - Predicted 175C 0.254V - Predicted 170C 0.278V - Predicted 165C 0.305V - Predicted 160C 0.336V - Predicted 155C 0.369V - Predicted 150C 0.407V - Predicted 145C 0.448V - Predicted 140C 0.494V - Predicted 135C 0.545V - Predicted 130C 0.603V - Predicted 125C 0.668V - Predicted 120C 0.740V - Predicted 115C 0.817V - Predicted 110C 0.914V - Predicted 105C 1.023V - Predicted 100C 1.15V 90C 1.42V - Predicted 85C 1.59V 80C 1.74V 75C 1.94V 70C 2.10V 65C 2.33V 60C 2.56V 58C 2.68V 57C 2.70V 56C 2.74V 55C 2.78V 54C 2.80V 50C 2.98V 49C 3.06V 47C 3.18V 45C 3.23V 43C 3.36V 40C 3.51V 37C 3.67V 35C 3.75V 30C 4.00V As before, the formula in HPTuners is here: https://www.hptuners.com/documentation/files/VCM-Scanner/Content/vcm_scanner/defining_a_transform.htm?Highlight=defining a transform Specifically: In my case I used 50C and 150C, given the sensor is supposedly for that. Input 1 = 2.98V Output 1 = 50C Input 2 = 0.407V Output 2 = 150C (0.407-2.98) / (150-50) -2.573/100 = -0.02573 2.98/-0.02573 + 47.045 = 50 So the corresponding formula should be: (Input / -0.02573) + 47.045 = Output.   If someone can confirm my math it'd be great. Supposedly you can pick any two pairs of the data to make this formula.
×
×
  • Create New...