Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hi fellas.

Quick and ably.

As far as the only turbo goes,not including my mods besides the fact the target is up to 650 hp. Which turbo from Garret series will be better solution (if any is) for this horsepower range,for street driving to achieve faster spool (not track use as you see,just have good fun when you drive with quicker appearing spool sound) than T04z being in the same loundess range.

I read about gt35 gtx35 and gt40,but still I should ask someone with more experience before I let my money disappear.

Any ideas??

 

Thanks in advance for replies.

Edited by Baroque

niZmo- at least t04z is more responsive than t51r in that kind of rpm range i will stick with.

Ben34- Not exactly.If my main goal was to aim the sound only,i wouldn't go 650 hp.This is not just track use car,and the project will be top notch pure perfection so every detail has to be on the best level i can reach because thats what I want.

26 minutes ago, Baroque said:

niZmo- at least t04z is more responsive than t51r in that kind of rpm range i will stick with.

Ben34- Not exactly.If my main goal was to aim the sound only,i wouldn't go 650 hp.This is not just track use car,and the project will be top notch pure perfection so every detail has to be on the best level i can reach because thats what I want.

So why choose old tech turbo? Makes no sense at all. It's 2020, not1998

13 hours ago, Baroque said:

and the project will be top notch pure perfection so every detail has to be on the best level i can reach because thats what I want.

But you're entirely unfamiliar with turbos out there?

You have a lot of research to do.

Kings of the Castle are the Garrett G series or Borg Warner EFR. I would err on the side of the Garrett for livability reasons. They're physically smaller for the same power. They are fairly spooly. You won't care either way given how much better performance they would provide over a T04Z.

Thanks Kinkstaah.I have gt3582r in mind because it fits my power goals and what i have read,spools faster than the most turbos in that horsepower rate.

" So why choose old tech turbo? Makes no sense at all. It's 2020, not1998 "-  Im not just the guy who forgets good old parts.I take everything into consideration.

2 hours ago, Baroque said:

I have gt3582r in mind because it fits my power goals and what i have read,spools faster than the most turbos in that horsepower rate.

The GT3582R is ALSO an old tech turbo. The other options you have been pointed to are mush better.

Buy a modern turbo, send cover to these guys. All the noises, all the responses, all the chops amd no gay lag from dinosaur turbos or gay twin turbos.

http://TURBOMOD.PRO/

  • Like 1
23 hours ago, GTSBoy said:

But do they make the noise!!!!!???

They actually do make a fair bit of noise lol, I'd say they are exactly this spooly.

GTSBoy - but from what've read,3582R is the fastest spooler of them all,and that was my question of the topic.Older has to mean shieet right of the bat ??

Dose pipe Stutu-thanks man a lot.I didnt' know about these guys at all..

9 hours ago, Baroque said:

but from what've read,3582R is the fastest spooler of them all

On any given engine, with the turbo matched properly to provide the same maximum power, that simply cannot be true any more. The EFRs are ALL about response. The G series Garretts have smaller wheels for the same flow than any of those previous gen GTs.

The GT3582R may well be the fastest spooling of the old tech turbos, but that don't mean a thing when new tech comes along.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Latest Posts

    • From my youth: GTi-R clutch change is a massive pain. The gearboxes are fragile? But the car is super cool and I want one 😢 
    • Remember this is 1988 tech.
    • Driveline vibration is resolved. I ended up loosening all my engine mount and trans mount bolts, giving it a good shake then retightening everything and it's gone... Let's just say I was surprised that fixed it.  I've been happily driving it around again but unfortunately put zero time into my direct port/constant pressure WMI setup. I'm on vacation next week, so I'll try and finalize it then.  On a different note, I spent all week fuel/ignition mapping 2x 216L V16 engines. Turbo's were burning glycol and we swapped them out for larger units. We also had planned emissions testing on site, so I figured I'd be there the same week to use their instrumentation and massage any emissions issues out if needed. This was a first for me. Fuel management is similar in certain ways to automotive (i.e air density as load variable) but very different in others. It's all PLC based and AFR's are controlled by air and not fuel. They use a control valve between the turbo and air manifold to control pressure which in turn controls AFR's. Due to this, target AFR tables supplied by the OEM are in pressures and not mass which really through me off. They use air pressure vs fuel pressure tables. I also relied on an O2 concentration sensor the emissions team had in the exhaust. Ignition timing was also all over the place and we were losing a fair bit of power. They're now happily sitting at 16-40BTDC depending on load. We were making about 1600kw at 900rpm at 90% load. Engines were running a lot smoother as well.    
    • heh, aint no R32 ever meeting modern targa cage rules unless the driver is veeeery short OP, good luck with the sale, since its already in the land of freedom I'm sure you will find a good buyer.
    • meh, it was a good video, clear about the issue and how he dealt with it. A bit heavy on the RTV and very brave to put an RB in anything without rebuilding it first, but otherwise I thought it was good Dose, I'm not sure that having the pickup forward is a big issue; yes of course the oil could shift under brakes but the sump should never be empty enough for that to be a problem (unless you also have a higher volume oil pump, and that oil can't return from the head to the sump quickly enough)
×
×
  • Create New...