Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, I did some searching around and wasn’t really able to find any non-dated/useful information. I’m pretty new with wiring and electrical stuff on these RB’s, so give me some slack.

Anyways, I’m in the market for a Power FC for my RB25DET, and I’m kinda just trying to see if the Power FC is the one for me. I know there’s plenty of monitoring you can do on your hand controller (boost, coolant temp, etc.), but could someone write a list of everything there is that you can monitor?

I’m also interested in a multifunction-like gauge. Basically, I want to see speed, tach, water temp, etc. (the basic stuff), and I want it to be in a small gauge pod so it can be just mounted to the dash or whatever.

Thanks guys!

Link to comment
https://www.sau.com.au/forums/topic/479779-power-fc-hand-controller-options/
Share on other sites

I disagree, PowerFC with Handcontroller  ($800-1000) will show everything OP requested plus much more (ecu inputs status, ability to set basic parameters, and even full tune if really necessary) for less than half the price of a haltech/link etc with dash.

I've just replaced the PFC with a Link in the stagea and miss the hand controller, am looking at adding OBD port and OBD display to the Link but everything is more $$$ to do what the PFC already did. Yes they are more capable ECUs but for a standard or lightly modified car PFC have been doing the job perfectly for decades.

  • Like 1

Agreed with the above.

There are definitely more complex ecu's out there with more features but for your basic mod's PFC is a decent choice.

Heck, I'm still using mine 12 years on and local tuners can still use them too.

2 hours ago, Duncan said:

I disagree, PowerFC with Handcontroller  ($800-1000) will show everything OP requested plus much more (ecu inputs status, ability to set basic parameters, and even full tune if really necessary) for less than half the price of a haltech/link etc with dash.

I've just replaced the PFC with a Link in the stagea and miss the hand controller, am looking at adding OBD port and OBD display to the Link but everything is more $$$ to do what the PFC already did. Yes they are more capable ECUs but for a standard or lightly modified car PFC have been doing the job perfectly for decades.

 

40 minutes ago, r33cruiser said:

Agreed with the above.

There are definitely more complex ecu's out there with more features but for your basic mod's PFC is a decent choice.

Heck, I'm still using mine 12 years on and local tuners can still use them too.

I’m going with a Garrett GT3076R, 3 inch exhaust, probably 750cc injectors, top mount manifold, Walbro 255, and TiAL BOV and wastegate. Would a Power FC be good for this setup?

It will work fine, as long as you are still running the air flow meter of course. Having a BOV connected will help prevent stalling when the throttle shuts suddenly which can be hard to tune for with an AFM

That was pretty similar to what I had been running for years on a PFC before I went a little sillier on the new engine...

Yep you'll be fine.

Only minor issue you MAY have is air flow reversion back through the AFM causing a slight stall. With a decent length intake pipe and a good tuner you'll be fine.

 

 

 

 

I believe the stock ECU, therefore the powerFC can only monitor:

Ign Map

Inj Map

AirFlow

Injector

Boost

Acceler.

Ign/Inj

Cranking

Wtr Temp

Rev/Idle

 

So the big ones missing would be Oil Temp and Oil pressure, i think you can add them as analogue inputs, expect that to add around $300 to the cost for good quality sensors.

 

Also AFR would not be shown, again i think about $80 for a half decent one? Also not sure how many, if any, analogue inputs are in the PowerFC.

Edited by Tobz

If it was me i would get a haltech or even adaptronic modular ecu.

They both have can bus and means you can then run something like this https://www.powertunedigital.com/ and pop it in a R34 MFD hood

would still need oil temp, pressure and afr sensors though.

 

I have an adaptronic select and that has limited me a bit so i had to get a Race Technologies Dash 2 Pro (which includes logging for track work) along with the oil temp, pressure and afr sensors and will be mounting it in the GTR MFD hood.

On 2/20/2020 at 11:35 PM, Tobz said:

 If it was me i would get a haltech or even adaptronic modular ecu.

They both have can bus and means you can then run something like this https://www.powertunedigital.com/ and pop it in a R34 MFD hood

would still need oil temp, pressure and afr sensors though.

 

I have an adaptronic select and that has limited me a bit so i had to get a Race Technologies Dash 2 Pro (which includes logging for track work) along with the oil temp, pressure and afr sensors and will be mounting it in the GTR MFD hood.

 

On 2/20/2020 at 11:14 PM, Tobz said:

I believe the stock ECU, therefore the powerFC can only monitor:

Ign Map

Inj Map

AirFlow

Injector

Boost

Acceler.

Ign/Inj

Cranking

Wtr Temp

Rev/Idle

 

So the big ones missing would be Oil Temp and Oil pressure, i think you can add them as analogue inputs, expect that to add around $300 to the cost for good quality sensors.

 

Also AFR would not be shown, again i think about $80 for a half decent one? Also not sure how many, if any, analogue inputs are in the PowerFC.

Well something more modern like a Haltech is something I’ll look into. But basically, I want a good and reliable ECU that call also plug into a screen to read vehicle speed, fuel level, coolant temp, etc.

The cost of a PFC is good, but if there are better options for more money, I’d rather just spend the money.

So say I want to look into something more modern/better. What’s a better ECU? Also, it’s an RB25 240SX

On 18/02/2020 at 11:55 AM, ltsmatthew said:

 

I’m going with a Garrett GT3076R, 3 inch exhaust, probably 750cc injectors, top mount manifold, Walbro 255, and TiAL BOV and wastegate. Would a Power FC be good for this setup?

No, because you're planning to run an atmospheric BOV.

Also why a GT3076? Man it's 2020 not 2006.

On 23/02/2020 at 2:03 AM, ltsmatthew said:

want a good and reliable ECU that call also plug into a screen to read vehicle speed, fuel level, coolant temp, etc.

Won’t be able to get fuel level or speed without running your own sensor. 

 

As said before the car can only show the below. Anything additional will require you to add your own sensors to the new ECU or Dash

Ign Map

Inj Map

AirFlow

Injector

Boost

Acceler.

Ign/Inj

Cranking

Wtr Temp

Rev/Idle

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Have a look at that (shitty) pic I posted. You can see AN -4 braided line coming to a -4 to 1/8 BSPT adapter, into a 1/8 BSPT T piece. The Haltech pressure sender is screwed into the long arm of the sender and factory sender (pre your pic) into the T side. You can also see the cable tie holding the whole contraption in place. Is it better than mounting the sender direct to your engine fitting......yes because it removes that vibration as the engine revs out 50 times every lap and that factory sender is pretty big. Is it necessary for you......well I've got no idea, I just don't like something important failing twice so over-engineer it to the moon!
    • Yup. You can get creative and make a sort of "bracket" with cable ties. Put 2 around the sender with a third passing underneath them strapped down against the sender. Then that third one is able to be passed through some hole at right angles to the orientation of the sender. Or some variation on the theme. Yes.... ummm, with caveats? I mean, the sender is BSP and you would likely have AN stuff on the hose, so yes, there would be the adapter you mention. But the block end will either be 1/8 NPT if that thread is still OK in there, or you can drill and tap it out to 1/4 BSP or NPT and use appropriate adapter there. As it stands, your mention of 1/8 BSPT male seems... wrong for the 1/8 NPT female it has to go into. The hose will be better, because even with the bush, the mass of the sender will be "hanging" off a hard threaded connection and will add some stress/strain to that. It might fail in the future. The hose eliminates almost all such risk - but adds in several more threaded connections to leak from! It really should be tapered, but it looks very long in that photo with no taper visible. If you have it in hand you should be able to see if it tapered or not. There technically is no possibility of a mechanical seal with a parallel male in a parallel female, so it is hard to believe that it is parallel male, but weirder things have happened. Maybe it's meant to seat on some surface when screwed in on the original installation? Anyway, at that thread size, parallel in parallel, with tape and goop, will seal just fine.
    • How do you propose I cable tie this: To something securely? Is it really just a case of finding a couple of holes and ziptying it there so it never goes flying or starts dangling around, more or less? Then run a 1/8 BSP Female to [hose adapter of choice?/AN?] and then the opposing fitting at the bush-into-oil-block end? being the hose-into-realistically likely a 1/8 BSPT male) Is this going to provide any real benefit over using a stainless/steel 1/4 to 1/8 BSPT reducing bush? I am making the assumption the OEM sender is BSPT not BSPP/BSP
    • I fashioned a ramp out of a couple of pieces of 140x35 lumber, to get the bumper up slightly, and then one of these is what I use
    • I wouldn't worry about dissimilar metal corrosion, should you just buy/make a steel replacement. There will be thread tape and sealant compound between the metals. The few little spots where they touch each other will be deep inside the joint, unable to get wet. And the alloy block is much much larger than a small steel fitting, so there is plenty of "sacrificial" capacity there. Any bush you put in there will be dissimilar anyway. Either steel or brass. Maybe stainless. All of them are different to the other parts in the chain. But what I said above still applies.
×
×
  • Create New...