Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I rarely shift at above 7000 rpm, but so far I feel MTL shifts slightly quicker than MT-90.  That could all just be in my head though as knowing beforehand MTL is rated at 75W-80 and MT-90 is rated at 75W-90.  

On 24/01/2021 at 12:11 AM, MoMnDadGTR said:

redline shockproof fluid is total junk.

FYP, more correct. If shockproof was so good for gear only protection the offroaders with Albins dog boxes would use it - they do not.

Shockproof is a funny one. For more clarity regarding this, as Duncan mentioned if you use it with a stuffed synchro box it masks the problem with shifting. But from my usage from years ago if you use it in a great condition box it stuffs the synchros - go figure.

On 24/01/2021 at 5:00 AM, TXSquirrel said:

I had MT-90 before but running MTL now.  I prefer MTL, seems to suit better with the warmer and more humid climate I am located.

Redline MT-90 or MTL seems like a good choice if it's readily available to you for sure 👍 The difference between then might not just be in you head though-

Because of availability, I just personally have found the synthetic Castrol Syntrans 75w85 to be the best with synchro boxes for shifting quality. The  Penrite equivalent (which the name escapes me) is also pretty good.

Castrol Syntrax 75w90 by comparison was total crap - no shift above 6000rpm, so I think it's more to do with the contained additives sometimes not just the viscosity.

Syntrans is a GL-4, Syntrax is a GL-5

I am running TriboDyn in all my gearbox's now and so far working really well. 

Quietened down a gtr box with noisy bearing and it didn't like to shift great when cold.  It has saved me from pulling it out and been going 2 years now. 

Also going fine in my syncro OS giken box 2years later. 

 

 

  • Like 1
5 hours ago, BK said:

FYP, more correct. If shockproof was so good for gear only protection the offroaders with Albins dog boxes would use it - they do not.

Shockproof is a funny one. For more clarity regarding this, as Duncan mentioned if you use it with a stuffed synchro box it masks the problem with shifting. But from my usage from years ago if you use it in a great condition box it stuffs the synchros - go figure.

Redline MT-90 or MTL seems like a good choice if it's readily available to you for sure 👍 The difference between them might not just be in you head though-

Because of availability, I just personally have found the synthetic Castrol Syntrans 75w85 to be the best with synchro boxes for shifting quality. The  Penrite equivalent (which the name escapes me) is also pretty good.

Castrol Syntrax 75w90 by comparison was total crap - no shift above 6000rpm, so I think it's more to do with the contained additives sometimes not just the viscosity.

Syntrans is a GL-4, Syntrax is a GL-5

 Castrol Syntrans 75w85 for the win. i messaged you a while back on this ben,  was able to get a few rips in the car with the new castrol fluid before we ripped it apart for the build. shifted the exact same as the fluid i had in prior at regular rpm(3-5500) but seems to be far better at redline shifts...this is just my opinion tho, im not an expert by any means. but i do know for a fact that i have thrown out 300 dollars worth of redline fluid this week. 

1 hour ago, MoMnDadGTR said:

 Castrol Syntrans 75w85 for the win. i messaged you a while back on this ben,  was able to get a few rips in the car with the new castrol fluid before we ripped it apart for the build. shifted the exact same as the fluid i had in prior at regular rpm(3-5500) but seems to be far better at redline shifts...this is just my opinion tho, im not an expert by any means. but i do know for a fact that i have thrown out 300 dollars worth of redline fluid this week. 

Hey that's really good to hear you've had good results with it too. At lower rpm shifts any  gear oil will pretty much feel like anything else I guess when at operating temp, but at higher rpm is where you'll generally notice the difference between different oils.

I've tested heaps of these different oils on the quarter with the GTR synchro stock box and the OS giken synchro box which means shifting at least at 6.5k - 7k plus. The Castrol Syntrans 75w85 is completely repeatable at a variety of different temps on high rpm shifting - really really consistent and never broken a box with it (touch wood).

I've broken gearboxes with Redline shockproof oil, HKS actual GTR specific GTR gear oil and Castrol Syntrax 75w90.

The HKS oil is another one to avoid as it seemed just too thick for the synchros to work properly. I think it was a 90w120 from memory and I'm not even sure if it's sold anymore. But the Shockproof lightweight, HKS and Syntrax oils hated the 2nd to 3rd shift - they just didn't go in at speed.

1 hour ago, BK said:

Hey that's really good to hear you've had good results with it too. At lower rpm shifts any  gear oil will pretty much feel like anything else I guess when at operating temp, but at higher rpm is where you'll generally notice the difference between different oils.

I've tested heaps of these different oils on the quarter with the GTR synchro stock box and the OS giken synchro box which means shifting at least at 6.5k - 7k plus. The Castrol Syntrans 75w85 is completely repeatable at a variety of different temps on high rpm shifting - really really consistent and never broken a box with it (touch wood).

I've broken gearboxes with Redline shockproof oil, HKS actual GTR specific GTR gear oil and Castrol Syntrax 75w90.

The HKS oil is another one to avoid as it seemed just too thick for the synchros to work properly. I think it was a 90w120 from memory and I'm not even sure if it's sold anymore. But the Shockproof lightweight, HKS and Syntrax oils hated the 2nd to 3rd shift - they just didn't go in at speed.

i usually drive my car at night time around here so i know i sound like a classic dumb canadian but its cold here always(about 0 to plus 15 degreees celcius here all summer and fall. minus 52 today no joke coldest day of the year today i think. cant even go outside it f****d out, so even getting fluids to warm up daily driving can be a challenge. especiialy on our diesel motors. this being said i felt the hotter and harder i was on the syntrans fluid and the more i got the gearbox temps up it just started shifting like a dream. im totally convinced i wont use anything else now. i think anyone using redline is either stuck in the 90s or still using USA forums for information. real smart......

drove the sti this morning 4 blocks to day care and went and got mail, by the time i got home i would have to wait about 2 seconds for the clutch slave to fully disengage before i could get back into throttle and continue into the next gear. fluid turns to gel fast....im ready to move soon

9 hours ago, BK said:

Redline MT-90 or MTL seems like a good choice if it's readily available to you for sure 👍 The difference between them might not just be in you head though-

Because of availability, I just personally have found the synthetic Castrol Syntrans 75w85 to be the best with synchro boxes for shifting quality. The  Penrite equivalent (which the name escapes me) is also pretty good.

Castrol Syntrax 75w90 by comparison was total crap - no shift above 6000rpm, so I think it's more to do with the contained additives sometimes not just the viscosity.

Syntrans is a GL-4, Syntrax is a GL-5

Under 4000 rpm I know the difference is definitely not just in my head, MTL shifts way better than MT-90 especially before fluid is fully warmed up and that's why I prefer it.  Between 4000 and 7000 rpm the difference is interesting, it's hard to describe but kind of feels like stirring different viscosity drinks in a glass with a metal spoon.  The MTL feels like stirring a more watery drink in a glass so I can move the shifter quicker, but the moment it goes into gear there is a slightly crispier but harsher notch, like clinking the glass with a metal spoon in coffee instead of smoothie, a feeling I'm still getting used to.

With MT-90 the 2nd gear would grind before completely warmed up, and I switched about 6 months ago because a shop suggested MTL could help and the job was inexpensive.  Will see how it holds up in the next few years.

I believe you are right about the different fluids containing different additives and not just difference in viscosity.  Your experience with the Castrol fluids could be comparable to my experience with Redline fluids, and I'm interested to know if others would like to try it, however sounds like Redline isn't as readily available there.

17 minutes ago, TXSquirrel said:

Under 4000 rpm I know the difference is definitely not just in my head, MTL shifts way better than MT-90 especially before fluid is fully warmed up and that's why I prefer it.  Between 4000 and 7000 rpm the difference is interesting, it's hard to describe but kind of feels like stirring different viscosity drinks in a glass with a metal spoon.  The MTL feels like stirring a more watery drink in a glass so I can move the shifter quicker, but the moment it goes into gear there is a slightly crispier but harsher notch, like clinking the glass with a metal spoon in coffee instead of smoothie, a feeling I'm still getting used to.

With MT-90 the 2nd gear would grind before completely warmed up, and I switched about 6 months ago because a shop suggested MTL could help and the job was inexpensive.  Will see how it holds up in the next few years.

I believe you are right about the different fluids containing different additives and not just difference in viscosity.  Your experience with the Castrol fluids could be comparable to my experience with Redline fluids, and I'm interested to know if others would like to try it, however sounds like Redline isn't as readily available there.

i dont know why you would ever select a fluid based on how in functions when its not at operating temps. id be more concerned about how it when being smacked around a bit and what your synchro's look like when you tear your gearbox down... just my 2 cents tho. sounds like your pretty easy on your unit and dont rev it up to often tho, so i bet you could pretty much through wat ever you want in there and you would be ok. cheers. i dont think its hard to see that most the guys here commenting are running way more power than me and you ever will and they are saying its not good. if you took that redline fluid to the track for few days your gearbox would look like it has grease in it. b interesting if you magically had some syntrans and could try that. i feel like this thread would be dead at that point.

If your transmission lives a pretty easy life and isn't subject to heavy shock loads then protection at operating temperatures is not as big a concern as behavior when cold, personally I plan on trying Motorcraft's GL-4 as it supposedly has had pretty good results at taming some rather grind-prone Miata transmissions.

  • 6 months later...

So here's an odd one that I'd like to hear opinions on.

I ran a standard r32 gtr 1991 5 speed on track for years. it had heavy shockproof in it that whole period. No problems at all.

I bought a brand new series 3 box from rhd and my garage put "normal" oil in it. It ran fine for a few track days and changed the oil.  now after around 5-10 days on track it crunches on all upshifts over 4500rpm or so. Only double de-clutching stops the crunch on high rev changes.

When it started crunching I got the garage to inspect the clutch (os twin plate) and bleed the master and slave cylinders. They couldn't see anything wrong.

What killed the new box, wrong oil? The first fill on the new box and the oil change were both Millers CRX 75w90 NT which are described as for "Manual transmissions, synchromesh ... which require API GL4 or GL5 performance"

Edited by alexj

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • The average previous owner for these cars were basically S-chassis owners in the US. Teenagers or teenager-adjacent. I often tell people that neglect is easier to fix than something that was actively "repaired" by previous owners.
    • Update 3: Hi all It's been a while. Quite a lot of things happened in the meantime, among other things the car is (almost) back together and ready to be started again. Things that I fixed or changed: Full turbo removal, fitting back the OEM turbo oil hardlines. Had to do quite a bit of research and parts shopping to get every last piece that I need and make it work with the GT2860 turbos, but it does work and is not hard to do. Proves that the previous owner(s) just did not want to. While I was there I set the preload for the wastegates to 0,9bar to hopefully make it easier for the tuner to hit the 370hp I need for the legal inspections that will follow later on. Boost can always go up if necessary. Fitted a AN10 line from the catch can to the intake hose to make the catchcan and hopefully the cam covers a slight vacuum to have less restrictive oil returns from the head and not have mud build up as harshly in the lines and catch can. Removed the entire front interior just shy of the dashboard itself to clean up some of the absolutely horrendous wiring, (hopefully) fix the bumpy tacho and put in LED bulbs while I was there. Also put in bulbs where there was none before, like the airbag one. I also used that chance to remove the LED rpm gauge on the steering column, which was also wired in absolute horror show fashion. Moved the 4in1 Prosport gauge from sitting in front of the OEM oil pressure gauge to the center console vents, I used a 3D printed vent piece to hold that gauge there. The HKB steering wheel boss was likely on incorrectly as I sometimes noticed the indicator reset being uneven for left vs. right. In the meantime also installed an airbag delete resistor, as one should. Installed Cube Speed premium short shifter. Feels pretty nice, hope it'll work great too when I actually get to drive. Also put on a fancy Dragon Ball shift knob, cause why not. My buddy was kind enough to weld the rust hole in the back, it was basically rusted through in the lowermost corner of the passenger side trunk area where the wheel arch, trunk panel and rear quarter all meet. Obviously there is still a lot of crustiness in various areas but as long as it's not rusted out I'll just treat and isolate the corrosion and pretend it's not there. Also had to put down a new ground wire for the rear subframe as the original one was BARELY there. Probably a bit controversial depending on who you ask about this... but I ended up just covering the crack in the side of the engine block, the one above the oil feed, with JB Weld. I used a generous amount and roughed up the whole area with a Dremel before, so I hope this will hold the coolant where it should be for the foreseeable future. Did a cam cover gasket job as the half moons were a bit leaky, and there too one could see the people who worked on this car before me were absolute tools. The same half moons were probably used like 3 times without even cleaning the old RTV off. Dremeled out the inside of the flange where the turbine housing mates onto the exhaust manifolds so the diameter matches, as the OEM exhaust manifolds are even narrower than the turbine housings as we all know. Even if this doesn't do much, I had them out anyways, so can't harm. Ideally one would port-match both the turbo and the manifold to the gasket size but I really didn't feel up to disassembling the turbine housings. Wrapped turbo outlet dumps in heat wrap band. Will do the frontpipe again as well as now the oil leak which promted me to tear apart half the engine in the first place is hopefully fixed. Fitted an ATI super damper to get rid of the worn old harmonic balancer. Surely one of the easiest and most worth to do mods. But torquing that ARP bolt to spec was a bitch without being able to lock the flywheel. Did some minor adjustments in the ECU tables to change some things I didn't like, like the launch control that was ALWAYS active. Treated rusty spots and surface corrosion on places I could get to and on many spots under the car, not pretty or ideal but good enough for now. Removed the N1 rear spats and the carbon surrounding for the tailpipe to put them back on with new adhesive as the old one was lifting in many spots, not pretty. Took out the passenger rear lamp housing... what do you know. Amateur work screwed me again here as they were glued in hard and removing it took a lot of force, so I broke one of the housing bolts off. And when removing the adhesive from the chassis the paint came right off too. Thankfully all the damaged area won't be visible later, but whoever did the very limited bodywork on this car needs to have their limbs chopped off piece by piece.   Quite a list if I do say so myself, but a lot of time was spent just discovering new shit that is wrong with the car and finding a solution or parts to fix it. My last problem that I now have the headache of dealing with is that the exhaust studs on the turbo outlets are M10x1.25 threaded, but the previous owner already put on regular M10 nuts so the threads are... weird. I only found this out the hard way. So now I will just try if I can in any way fit the front pipe regardless, if not I'll have to redo the studs with the turbos installed. Lesson learned for the future: Redo ALL studs you put your hands on, especially if they are old and the previous owners were inept maniacs. Thanks for reading if you did, will update when the engine runs again. Hope nothing breaks or leaks and I can do a test drive.
    • No those pads are DBA too  but they have colors too. I look at the and imo the green "street" are the best.
    • I’m not sure what happened I told them about sonic tunes free OTS tune and the next the I know .. I was booted..   To funny 
×
×
  • Create New...