Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

I run a 4 port solenoids, however I don't recommend it for everyone.

In the past when I could be bothered working on other people's car for beer and cash I would generally fit 3 ports sourced from efisolutions aka taarks back in the day.

https://www.efisolutions.com.au/3-port-mac-valve-boost-control-solenoid

 

2 hours ago, IM-32-FK said:

what fitting style do you use?

I actually fitted 3AN Teflon lines from the valve to the wastegate.

Had too many issues with hoses popping off at the track so full sent it with AN fittings.

 

And Birrong Automotive are great, love their RBs.

 

 

  • 3 weeks later...

just a couple more questions:

- i was the told the r32 tps is better than 33/neo tps because it has a 'longer/bigger/larger' pulse and that i should run that instead

- was also told to run a slytech 2 wire universal iacv too instead of the stock iacv on a plazmaman plenum because the coolant spring in the stock iacv can cause problems

anyone care to advise?

Not sure what ecu you have again but if it's capable, why not just go DBW throttle body. No need for iacv and probably TPS too. I'm sure @Dose Pipe Sutututu will be here in a moment to say exactly this.

  • Like 2

Throw the TPS, cable throttle, idle control valve, aux air valve out and go DBW.

I wish I did this sooner, superb idle control, no issues with big cams and AC, etc.

Not to mention you can now setup cruise control too.

 

 

 

  • Like 2
1 hour ago, Dose Pipe Sutututu said:

Throw the TPS, cable throttle, idle control valve, aux air valve out and go DBW.

I wish I did this sooner, superb idle control, no issues with big cams and AC, etc.

Not to mention you can now setup cruise control too.

 

 

 

ok i bought a plazmaman inlet with a 74 dbw, but that means i need to buy a link g4ret and also need to buy a pedal and mount so it comes down to paying like $500 more compared to throttle cable setup.

it better be worth it.

Edited by IM-32-FK
  • Like 2
7 hours ago, IM-32-FK said:

just a couple more questions:

- i was the told the r32 tps is better than 33/neo tps because it has a 'longer/bigger/larger' pulse and that i should run that instead

- was also told to run a slytech 2 wire universal iacv too instead of the stock iacv on a plazmaman plenum because the coolant spring in the stock iacv can cause problems

anyone care to advise?

WTF does that even mean? Is he talking about the deletion of the idle switch in favor of voltage-based idle detection? All standalone ECUs to my knowledge ignore physical idle switches.

If you want DBW to be worth it just add cruise control and traction control to the tune, maybe DBW-based rev limiting to get a no-compromise soft cut while you're at it. There's more you can do but those three alone are pretty big headline features you can do "for free" that are kind of a disaster to implement on traditional cable throttle. In theory you can also implement tricks like automatic rev-matching too.

  • Like 2
10 hours ago, IM-32-FK said:

ok i bought a plazmaman inlet with a 74 dbw, but that means i need to buy a link g4ret and also need to buy a pedal and mount so it comes down to paying like $500 more compared to throttle cable setup.

it better be worth it.

Nice! I’m yet to get my car with the new DBW setup tuned but already is definitely worth it! Check out www.iee.nz they have dbw pedals that fit stock location and stock pedal pads for that true OEM fit, he also has the right size rubber grommets to fill the cable hole. I wish I found them before I went the 350z pedal with adaptor route… are you keeping the factory oil/water heat exchanger?

Edited by R3N3
  • Like 1
10 hours ago, IM-32-FK said:

It better be worth it.

It is, especially when you can control the pedal curve, which cannot be done on a traditional setup unless you swap the the throttle wheels and that's still garbage because it's generally a fixed curve.

If you've ever driven a car with a large cable throttle you'll notice it's ver touchy at low RPMs, you can get rid of that behaviour with DBW and exponentially ramp in the DBW TP vs. your Accelerator Pedal Position (APP).

And lastly superior cold start, idle control.

1 hour ago, R3N3 said:

Nice! I’m yet to get my car with the new DBW setup tuned but already is definitely worth it! Check out www.iee.nz they have dbw pedals that fit stock location and stock pedal pads for that true OEM fit, he also has the right size rubber grommets to fill the cable hole. I wish I found them before I went the 350z pedal with adaptor route… are you keeping the factory oil/water heat exchanger?

so as far as im aware you can either

1- buy a bosch dbw pedal and mount it onto the chassis https://www.bosch-motorsport-shop.com.au/accelerator-pedal-module

2- Buy an adapter plate that lets you mount a 350z or BA/BF falcon dbw pedal onto skyline chassis stock position https://rbfactory.shop/products/ls1-drive-by-wire-pedal-mount-to-nissan-silvia-skyline

3-  or buy a ready built one like this https://www.iee.nz/product-page/gtr-electronic-pedal-conversion?currency=AUD

 

ive found the adaptor for supras to mount on the bosch dbw pedal, but i cant find one for r34 skylines

33 minutes ago, IM-32-FK said:

so as far as im aware you can either

1- buy a bosch dbw pedal and mount it onto the chassis https://www.bosch-motorsport-shop.com.au/accelerator-pedal-module

2- Buy an adapter plate that lets you mount a 350z or BA/BF falcon dbw pedal onto skyline chassis stock position https://rbfactory.shop/products/ls1-drive-by-wire-pedal-mount-to-nissan-silvia-skyline

3-  or buy a ready built one like this https://www.iee.nz/product-page/gtr-electronic-pedal-conversion?currency=AUD

 

ive found the adaptor for supras to mount on the bosch dbw pedal, but i cant find one for r34 skylines

I went with the Outsider Garage adaptor with 350z/350gt pedal. My recommendation would be the iee unit. 

17 minutes ago, R3N3 said:

I went with the Outsider Garage adaptor with 350z/350gt pedal. My recommendation would be the iee unit. 

this one? it says for r34 gtr but i got gtt. would it fit? also im guessing that doesnt come with pedal and you need to install your oem one in it? so this product just lines up and bolts directly onto the oem position

https://www.iee.nz/product-page/gtr-electronic-pedal-conversion?currency=AUD

Edited by IM-32-FK
30 minutes ago, IM-32-FK said:

this one? it says for r34 gtr but i got gtt. would it fit? also im guessing that doesnt come with pedal and you need to install your oem one in it? so this product just lines up and bolts directly onto the oem position

https://www.iee.nz/product-page/gtr-electronic-pedal-conversion?currency=AUD

Correct. All you need is the pedal pad.

I can’t confirm if the accelerator pedal fits the GTT, but I assume it would. A quick google search shows that the pedal pad should at least fit..

send Stefan (owner of iee) a message, he’s really good to deal with and may have been asked before.

Edited by R3N3
2 minutes ago, R3N3 said:

Correct. All you need is the pedal pad.

I can’t confirm if the accelerator pedal fits the GTT, but I assume it would. A quick google search shows that the pedal pad should at least fit..

send Stefan (owner of iee) a message, he’s really good to deal with and may have been asked before.

its alright i already got the gtr metal pedal to fit gtt rod, just had to bore out the little plastic thing that sits inside the rod and the pedal

theres also this one

https://www.powertune.com.au/collections/rb26-solutions/products/dbw-electronic-dbw-pedal-suits-r32-r33-r34-gtr

 

1 minute ago, IM-32-FK said:

its alright i already got the gtr metal pedal to fit gtt rod, just had to bore out the little plastic thing that sits inside the rod and the pedal

theres also this one

https://www.powertune.com.au/collections/rb26-solutions/products/dbw-electronic-dbw-pedal-suits-r32-r33-r34-gtr

 

To be fair. It doesn’t matter which pedal you go with, as long as it bolts up. The software manages the rest.

just check the compatibility of a GTR pedal into a GTT and you’re away 

23 minutes ago, R3N3 said:

To be fair. It doesn’t matter which pedal you go with, as long as it bolts up. The software manages the rest.

just check the compatibility of a GTR pedal into a GTT and you’re away 

im not going to do it but im just curious, do you have an idea about the wiring? where do wires from pedal go, where do wires from tb go and where does the link g4ret fit in? i think i may need a second expansion loom.  this setup is costing me $2400

Edited by IM-32-FK
2 minutes ago, IM-32-FK said:

im not going to do it but im just curious, do you have an idea about the wiring? where do wires from throttle go, where do wires from tb go and where does the link g4ret fit in? i think i may need a second expansion loom.  this setup is costing me $2400

Wiring is pretty simple. The pedal and the throttle wire directly to the ecu. Remember you’re removing the aac and tps, so should free up some I/O at the ECU At the same time.

the pedal is essentially 2x tps sensors. It has 2x 5v, 2x signal ground and 2x signal wires. The 5v and signal ground can be common. So 4 wires total.

the throttle is essentially the same but with 12v stepper motor wires.

also remember that there is some re-routing of coolant hoses under the plenum when doing DBW. Check my build thread for info if you need.

23 minutes ago, R3N3 said:

Wiring is pretty simple. The pedal and the throttle wire directly to the ecu. Remember you’re removing the aac and tps, so should free up some I/O at the ECU At the same time.

the pedal is essentially 2x tps sensors. It has 2x 5v, 2x signal ground and 2x signal wires. The 5v and signal ground can be common. So 4 wires total.

the throttle is essentially the same but with 12v stepper motor wires.

also remember that there is some re-routing of coolant hoses under the plenum when doing DBW. Check my build thread for info if you need.

So I’m guessing my plug in g4+ requires a link e throttle module?

 

https://www.platinumracingproducts.com/products/link-ecu-e-throttle-g4-g4ret?currency=AUD&variant=44179266109672&utm_term=&utm_campaign=&utm_source=adwords&utm_medium=ppc&hsa_acc=9668545500&hsa_cam=18866448471&hsa_grp=&hsa_ad=&hsa_src=x&hsa_tgt=&hsa_kw=&hsa_mt=&hsa_net=adwords&hsa_ver=3&gclid=EAIaIQobChMI86K2nfmq_gIVqJlmAh37NAakEAQYASABEgLZLPD_BwE

10 hours ago, R3N3 said:

It appears so... I run Haltech, so I’m not familiar with link ecu.

Is it still okay to use the collector intake gasket, the one that sits between top and bottom half stock intake manifold? Like it was a new gasket that was put on and bolted down but the engine was never ran with it on.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • I know why it happened and I’m embarrassed to say but I was testing the polarity of one of the led bulb to see which side was positive with a 12v battery and that’s when it decided to fry hoping I didn’t damage anything else
    • I came here to note that is a zener diode too base on the info there. Based on that, I'd also be suspicious that replacing it, and it's likely to do the same. A lot of use cases will see it used as either voltage protection, or to create a cheap but relatively stable fixed voltage supply. That would mean it has seen more voltage than it should, and has gone into voltage melt down. If there is something else in the circuit dumping out higher than it should voltages, that needs to be found too. It's quite likely they're trying to use the Zener to limit the voltage that is hitting through to the transistor beside it, so what ever goes to the zener is likely a signal, and they're using the transistor in that circuit to amplify it. Especially as it seems they've also got a capacitor across the zener. Looks like there is meant to be something "noisy" to that zener, and what ever it was, had a melt down. Looking at that picture, it also looks like there's some solder joints that really need redoing, and it might be worth having the whole board properly inspected.  Unfortunately, without being able to stick a multimeter on it, and start tracing it all out, I'm pretty much at a loss now to help. I don't even believe I have a climate control board from an R33 around here to pull apart and see if any of the circuit appears similar to give some ideas.
    • Nah - but you won't find anything on dismantling the seats in any such thing anyway.
    • Could be. Could also be that they sit around broken more. To be fair, you almost never see one driving around. I see more R chassis GTRs than the Renault ones.
    • Yeah. Nah. This is why I said My bold for my double emphasis. We're not talking about cars tuned to the edge of det here. We're talking about normal cars. Flame propagation speed and the amount of energy required to ignite the fuel are not significant factors when running at 1500-4000 rpm, and medium to light loads, like nearly every car on the road (except twin cab utes which are driven at 6k and 100% load all the time). There is no shortage of ignition energy available in any petrol engine. If there was, we'd all be in deep shit. The calorific value, on a volume basis, is significantly different, between 98 and 91, and that turns up immediately in consumption numbers. You can see the signal easily if you control for the other variables well enough, and/or collect enough stats. As to not seeing any benefit - we had a couple of EF and EL Falcons in the company fleet back in the late 90s and early 2000s. The EEC IV ECU in those things was particularly good at adding in timing as soon as knock headroom improved, which typically came from putting in some 95 or 98. The responsiveness and power improved noticeably, and the fuel consumption dropped considerably, just from going to 95. Less delta from there to 98 - almost not noticeable, compared to the big differences seen between 91 and 95. Way back in the day, when supermarkets first started selling fuel from their own stations, I did thousands of km in FNQ in a small Toyota. I can't remember if it was a Starlet or an early Yaris. Anyway - the supermarket servos were bringing in cheap fuel from Indonesia, and the other servos were still using locally refined gear. The fuel consumption was typically at least 5%, often as much as 8% worse on the Indo shit, presumably because they had a lot more oxygenated component in the brew, and were probably barely meeting the octane spec. Around the same time or maybe a bit later (like 25 years ago), I could tell the difference between Shell 98 and BP 98, and typically preferred to only use Shell then because the Skyline ran so much better on it. Years later I found the realtionship between them had swapped, as a consequence of yet more refinery closures. So I've only used BP 98 since. Although, I must say that I could not fault the odd tank of United 98 that I've run. It's probably the same stuff. It is also very important to remember that these findings are often dependent on region. With most of the refineries in Oz now dead, there's less variability in local stuff, and he majority of our fuels are not even refined here any more anyway. It probably depends more on which SE Asian refinery is currently cheapest to operate.
×
×
  • Create New...