Jump to content
SAU Community

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, MBS206 said:

Interestingly, I would have thought the oil would be warming the coolant up to begin with, and then the coolant keeping oil temps down.

 

From memory oil runs at around 2.6kj/degc, while water is around 4.7

Water capacity from memory is nearly 10L vs 5L for oil.

 

In my tired ass state, coolant would need to be seeing 4x more heat energy than the oil (which is quite possible, this is an aspect I have NFI on, and does seem very plausible).

 

It would be interesting if anyone has oil temp logging and coolant temp (coolant in the block, not the rad hose) with the stock heat exchanger in place.

But I'm guessing most people logging that sort of data these days are running aftermarket coolers and no exchanger.

 

It's a matter of where the heat is released and which fluid sees it first, rather than high falutin' thermodynamics stuff with specific heat capacity or how much of the stuff is in the engine.. Combustion happens in the head, which is heavy with water jackets.

  • Like 3
On 11/04/2023 at 10:13 PM, Murray_Calavera said:

@MBS206

I've got the factory heat exchanger, oil temp sensor in my sandwich plate and water temp sensor in the factory location. Happy to log data if you like. 

Just still trying to wrap my head around all of this as I'm still newbie in this field and still learning 

If you get an oil cooler kit that removes the factory HX but has an oil filter relocation with an inbuilt thermostat and the taarks oil block which allows for OEM pil pressure sensor and additional senskry ports for temp why would the factory HX still be required. Aren't all these components essentially working together to allow for warming/cooling of oil regardless of cold starts or not?

Example this kit I found has all components to allow for warming/cooling of oil regardless of cold start or drag/roll/circuit 

https://theskylineshed.com.au/products/the-skyline-shed-tss-oil-cooler-kit-to-suit-rb20-rb25-rb25neo-rb26-rb30?variant=41664869368002

 

 

 

 

36 minutes ago, YD34GTT said:

why would the factory HX still be required. Aren't all these components essentially working together to allow for warming/cooling of oil regardless of cold starts or not?

If you remove the factory water to oil HX, you do not get the warming aspect of that situation. Having the warming is a nicety that you can live without, probably unless you live in a real cold climate and would actually gain a reasonable sized benefit from keeping it.

  • Like 1
16 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

If you remove the factory water to oil HX, you do not get the warming aspect of that situation. Having the warming is a nicety that you can live without, probably unless you live in a real cold climate and would actually gain a reasonable sized benefit from keeping it.

Ahh ok so putting the taarks oil block with the sensors and the oil relocation with thermostat does not do what the factory HX does? (That's maybe where my thought process was wrong) I was under the assumption they replaced the factory HX and did a better job

14 minutes ago, GTSBoy said:

No. Does physically replace the HX, does not replace its function.

Ahaa ok now it makes sense thanks heaps for clarity 

And sorry last question then everything will make sense for me in this regard 

So why do so many remove the HX if it's function isn't replaced? Is it not important or is it that it does not perform well with heavily modified engines 

Like if I remove mine and use those oil cooler kits am I at risk of anything (I live in Sydney if that helps with climate)

 

People remove it for simplicity and realistically... room. If you're adding stuff out there, real estate is a limited budget and the function of this device is minimal at best. Especially for people who have 500kw and want an oil cooler.

Supposedly they fail but it doesn't actually seem to happen that often. It's primarily because the space and simplicity given people are usually adding sensors, -AN lines in the area that used to be occupied by that HX.

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now



  • Similar Content

  • Latest Posts

    • Echo the awesome sentiment 👍 Definitely a car worth saving. Looking forward to seeing updates as well. 
    • Scenic roads, stunning skylines, and Chickos to finish it off! Join SAU NSW as we cruise through the Royal National Park and along Lawrence Hargrave Drive to Figtree! Sunday 26th October 2025 4:30PM Meeting Waterfall Station Parking 5:00PM Cruise Departure Royal National Park > Lawrence Hargrave Dr > Memorial Dr > Sid Parrish Park 6:15PM Arrival at Sid Parrish Park Figtree Meet Location: Waterfall Station Parking Final Destination: Sid Parrish Park RSVP: https://forms.gle/E4s5SiRKQfDdypky8 *Disclaimer* There will be a lead and follow car so no one should get lost. If you would like to attend or bring others along please put your name down and a +1 as numbers will be needed prior! This is NOT a race and we will all be adhering to all road rules. If this is what you want please come to one of our many track days. This is an official SAU:NSW event and will be run under a CAMS permit. One of the things that really sets our club apart is our commitment to being true enthusiasts. When on normal roads we strive to maintain good relations with the authorities as well as the public in general. When attending one of Skylines Australia NSW events please try to: • Be aware of surrounding environment and act accordingly. • Drive courteously on the state’s roads as a true enthusiast should. • Understand how important it is to maintain the good name of SAU NSW and thus, treat others accordingly. • Any misbehavior will not be tolerated and you will be asked to leave.
    • It's funny, as Ive seen plenty of people use them in cheap builds on YT. And they actually go okay, even though a lot of other maxspeedingrods stuff is terrible. Those turbos seem reliable enough, the only part being, a good quality turbo that is "identical" to it, will out perform it day in and day out. In both a lower boost threshold, and the ability to flow more air at the same boost pressure. As a cheap cheap replacement, not a terrible choice. For cheap and shouldn't blow in a day, not terrible (like other eBay/Temu turbos) for low cost and still decent performance, that's where the question comes in to play from the results I've seen. I'd actually find it hilarious to buy one, and strap it to a paddock basher or some other cheap as POS originally NA car, and send it to the moon!
    • The maxpeedingrods turbo is cheap and bolts on to stock parts. I think you just need a bigger silicone coupler for the intake. Its a cheap china turbo, but it's been running on mine for almost 3 years at 16-19 psi.
    • What do they look like right after you've tried to start it with everything connected? Also post photos of what they actually look like.
×
×
  • Create New...